Literature DB >> 18653730

The effect of ancient DNA damage on inferences of demographic histories.

Erik Axelsson1, Eske Willerslev, M Thomas P Gilbert, Rasmus Nielsen.   

Abstract

The field of ancient DNA (aDNA) is casting new light on many evolutionary questions. However, problems associated with the postmortem instability of DNA may complicate the interpretation of aDNA data. For example, in population genetic studies, the inclusion of damaged DNA may inflate estimates of diversity. In this paper, we examine the effect of DNA damage on population genetic estimates of ancestral population size. We simulate data using standard coalescent simulations that include postmortem damage and show that estimates of effective population sizes are inflated around, or right after, the sampling time of the ancestral DNA sequences. This bias leads to estimates of increasing, and then decreasing, population sizes, as observed in several recently published studies. We reanalyze a recently published data set of DNA sequences from the Bison (Bison bison/Bison priscus) and show that the signal for a change in effective population size in this data set vanishes once the effects of putative damage are removed. Our results suggest that population genetic analyses of aDNA sequences, which do not accurately account for damage, should be interpreted with great caution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18653730     DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msn163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  18 in total

1.  Evaluating the impact of post-mortem damage in ancient DNA: a theoretical approach.

Authors:  Martyna Molak; Simon Y W Ho
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2011-11-20       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Pre-whaling genetic diversity and population ecology in eastern Pacific gray whales: insights from ancient DNA and stable isotopes.

Authors:  S Elizabeth Alter; Seth D Newsome; Stephen R Palumbi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  [aDNA Research From a Historical Perspective].

Authors:  Elsbeth Bösl
Journal:  NTM       Date:  2017-03

4.  Unlocking the vault: next-generation museum population genomics.

Authors:  Ke Bi; Tyler Linderoth; Dan Vanderpool; Jeffrey M Good; Rasmus Nielsen; Craig Moritz
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 6.185

5.  Ancient DNA analyses exclude humans as the driving force behind late Pleistocene musk ox (Ovibos moschatus) population dynamics.

Authors:  Paula F Campos; Eske Willerslev; Andrei Sher; Ludovic Orlando; Erik Axelsson; Alexei Tikhonov; Kim Aaris-Sørensen; Alex D Greenwood; Ralf-Dietrich Kahlke; Pavel Kosintsev; Tatiana Krakhmalnaya; Tatyana Kuznetsova; Philippe Lemey; Ross MacPhee; Christopher A Norris; Kieran Shepherd; Marc A Suchard; Grant D Zazula; Beth Shapiro; M Thomas P Gilbert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Paleopopulation genetics.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Wall; Montgomery Slatkin
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 16.830

7.  The use of museum specimens with high-throughput DNA sequencers.

Authors:  Andrew S Burrell; Todd R Disotell; Christina M Bergey
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 3.895

Review 8.  The impact of whole-genome sequencing on the reconstruction of human population history.

Authors:  Krishna R Veeramah; Michael F Hammer
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 53.242

9.  Using classical population genetics tools with heterochroneous data: time matters!

Authors:  Frantz Depaulis; Ludovic Orlando; Catherine Hänni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Accurate and fast methods to estimate the population mutation rate from error prone sequences.

Authors:  Bjarne Knudsen; Michael M Miyamoto
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.