Literature DB >> 18650155

Basal breast cancer molecular subtype predicts for lower incidence of axillary lymph node metastases in primary breast cancer.

Simon J Crabb1, Maggie C U Cheang, Samuel Leung, Taina Immonen, Torsten O Nielsen, David D Huntsman, Chris D Bajdik, Stephen K Chia.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Axillary lymph node involvement remains the most important prognostic factor in early-stage breast cancer. We hypothesized that molecular classification based on breast cancer biology would predict the presence of nodal involvement at diagnosis, which might aid treatment decisions regarding the axilla. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From a clinically annotated tissue microarray of 4444 early-stage breast cancers, expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), HER2, epidermal growth factor receptor, and cytokeratin 5/6 was determined by immunohistochemistry. Cases were classified by published criteria into molecular subtypes of luminal, luminal/HER2 positive, HER2 positive/ER negative/PgR negative, and basal. Risk of axillary nodal involvement at diagnosis was determined in 2 multivariable logistic regression models: a "core biopsy model" including molecular subtype, age, grade, and tumor size and a "lumpectomy model," which also included lymphovascular invasion. Luminal was used as the reference group. After internal validation of findings in 2 independent sets, we conducted combined analysis of both.
RESULTS: In the core biopsy model, the molecular subtypes had a predictive effect for nodal involvement (P= .000001), with the basal subtype having an odds ratio for axillary lymph node involvement of 0.53 (95% CI, 0.41-0.69). Tumor grade (P=5.43 x 10(-12)) and size (P=8.52 x 10(-35)) were also predictive for nodal involvement. Similar results were found in the lumpectomy model, where lymphovascular invasion was also predictive (P=2.74 x 10(-115)).
CONCLUSION: These results indicate that the basal breast cancer molecular subtype predicts a lower incidence of axillary nodal involvement, and including biomarker profiles to predict nodal status at diagnosis could help stratification for decisions regarding axillary surgery and locoregional radiation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18650155     DOI: 10.3816/CBC.2008.n.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer        ISSN: 1526-8209            Impact factor:   3.225


  53 in total

1.  How do I treat "triple-negative" disease.

Authors:  Christos Vaklavas; Andres Forero-Torres
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2011-12

2.  Estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 status predict lymphovascular invasion and lymph node involvement.

Authors:  Stacy Ugras; Michelle Stempel; Sujata Patil; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Age and Receptor Status Do Not Indicate the Need for Axillary Dissection in Patients with Sentinel Lymph Node Metastases.

Authors:  Anita Mamtani; Sujata Patil; Kimberly J Van Zee; Hiram S Cody; Melissa Pilewskie; Andrea V Barrio; Alexandra S Heerdt; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Evaluation of axillary lymph node metastasis burden by preoperative ultrasound in early-stage breast cancer with needle biopsy-proven metastasis.

Authors:  X Wang; L Chen; Y Sun; B Zhang
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 3.405

5.  Increased risk of locoregional recurrence for women with T1-2N0 triple-negative breast cancer treated with modified radical mastectomy without adjuvant radiation therapy compared with breast-conserving therapy.

Authors:  Bassam S Abdulkarim; Julie Cuartero; John Hanson; Jean Deschênes; David Lesniak; Siham Sabri
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Mammographic Density and Prediction of Nodal Status in Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  C C Hack; L Häberle; K Geisler; R Schulz-Wendtland; A Hartmann; P A Fasching; M Uder; D L Wachter; S M Jud; C R Loehberg; M P Lux; C Rauh; M W Beckmann; K Heusinger
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.915

7.  Lymph node involvement in immunohistochemistry-based molecular classifications of breast cancer.

Authors:  Nicholas K Howland; Teryn D Driver; Michael P Sedrak; Xianfeng Wen; Wenli Dong; Sandra Hatch; Mahmoud A Eltorky; Celia Chao
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 2.192

8.  CT-X antigen expression in human breast cancer.

Authors:  Anita Grigoriadis; Otavia L Caballero; Keith S Hoek; Leonard da Silva; Yao-Tseng Chen; Sandra J Shin; Achim A Jungbluth; Lance D Miller; David Clouston; Jonathan Cebon; Lloyd J Old; Sunil R Lakhani; Andrew J G Simpson; A Munro Neville
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Clinicopathological features of breast cancer with different molecular subtypes in Chinese women.

Authors:  Hong-Tao Cheng; Tao Huang; Wei Wang; Jun-Qiu Yue; Na Shen; Hui Guo; Da-Peng Li; Qun-Zi Zhao; Peng-Fei Yi; Rui Wang; Long-Qiang Wang
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2013-02-08

10.  Are breast cancer subtypes prognostic for nodal involvement and associated with clinicopathologic features at presentation in early-stage breast cancer?

Authors:  Tiffanie Jones; Hanmanth Neboori; H Wu; Qifeng Yang; Bruce G Haffty; Susan Evans; Susan Higgins; Meena S Moran
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.