BACKGROUND: Breast cancer subtypes (BCS) determined from immunohistochemical staining have been correlated with molecular subtypes and associated with prognosis and outcomes, but there are limited data correlating these BCS and axillary node involvement. This study was conducted to assess whether BCS predicted for nodal metastasis or was associated with other clinicopathologic features at presentation. METHODS: Patients with stage I/II disease who underwent breast-conserving surgery and axillary surgical assessment with available tissue blocks underwent a institutional pathological review and construction of a tissue microarray. The slides were stained for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER-2/neu (HER-2) for classification into BCS. Nodal involvement and other clinicopathologic features were analyzed to assess associations between BCS and patient and tumor characteristics. Outcomes were calculated a function of BCS. RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 453 patients (luminal A 48.6%, luminal B 16.1%, HER-2 11.0%, triple negative 24.2%), of which 22% (n=113) were node positive. There were no significant associations with BCS and pN stage, node positivity, or absolute number of nodes involved (p>0.05 for all). However, there were significant associations with subtype and age at presentation (p<0.001), method of detection (p=0.049), tumor histology (p<0.001), race (p=0.041), and tumor size (pT stage, p<0.001) by univariate and multivariate analysis. As expected, 10-year outcomes differed by BCS, with triple negative and HER-2 subtypes having the worse overall (p=0.03), disease-free (p=0.03), and distant metastasis-free survival (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant association between BCS and age, T stage, histology, method of detection, and race, but no associations to predict nodal involvement. If additionally validated, these findings suggest that BCS may not be a useful prognostic variable for influencing regional management considerations.
BACKGROUND:Breast cancer subtypes (BCS) determined from immunohistochemical staining have been correlated with molecular subtypes and associated with prognosis and outcomes, but there are limited data correlating these BCS and axillary node involvement. This study was conducted to assess whether BCS predicted for nodal metastasis or was associated with other clinicopathologic features at presentation. METHODS:Patients with stage I/II disease who underwent breast-conserving surgery and axillary surgical assessment with available tissue blocks underwent a institutional pathological review and construction of a tissue microarray. The slides were stained for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER-2/neu (HER-2) for classification into BCS. Nodal involvement and other clinicopathologic features were analyzed to assess associations between BCS and patient and tumor characteristics. Outcomes were calculated a function of BCS. RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 453 patients (luminal A 48.6%, luminal B 16.1%, HER-2 11.0%, triple negative 24.2%), of which 22% (n=113) were node positive. There were no significant associations with BCS and pN stage, node positivity, or absolute number of nodes involved (p>0.05 for all). However, there were significant associations with subtype and age at presentation (p<0.001), method of detection (p=0.049), tumor histology (p<0.001), race (p=0.041), and tumor size (pT stage, p<0.001) by univariate and multivariate analysis. As expected, 10-year outcomes differed by BCS, with triple negative and HER-2 subtypes having the worse overall (p=0.03), disease-free (p=0.03), and distant metastasis-free survival (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant association between BCS and age, T stage, histology, method of detection, and race, but no associations to predict nodal involvement. If additionally validated, these findings suggest that BCS may not be a useful prognostic variable for influencing regional management considerations.
Authors: Lisa A Carey; Charles M Perou; Chad A Livasy; Lynn G Dressler; David Cowan; Kathleen Conway; Gamze Karaca; Melissa A Troester; Chiu Kit Tse; Sharon Edmiston; Sandra L Deming; Joseph Geradts; Maggie C U Cheang; Torsten O Nielsen; Patricia G Moorman; H Shelton Earp; Robert C Millikan Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-06-07 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: C M Perou; T Sørlie; M B Eisen; M van de Rijn; S S Jeffrey; C A Rees; J R Pollack; D T Ross; H Johnsen; L A Akslen; O Fluge; A Pergamenschikov; C Williams; S X Zhu; P E Lønning; A L Børresen-Dale; P O Brown; D Botstein Journal: Nature Date: 2000-08-17 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Robert E Mansel; Lesley Fallowfield; Mark Kissin; Amit Goyal; Robert G Newcombe; J Michael Dixon; Constantinos Yiangou; Kieran Horgan; Nigel Bundred; Ian Monypenny; David England; Mark Sibbering; Tholkifl I Abdullah; Lester Barr; Utheshtra Chetty; Dudley H Sinnett; Anne Fleissig; Dayalan Clarke; Peter J Ell Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2006-05-03 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Torsten O Nielsen; Forrest D Hsu; Kristin Jensen; Maggie Cheang; Gamze Karaca; Zhiyuan Hu; Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Chad Livasy; Dave Cowan; Lynn Dressler; Lars A Akslen; Joseph Ragaz; Allen M Gown; C Blake Gilks; Matt van de Rijn; Charles M Perou Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2004-08-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Stefano Calza; Per Hall; Gert Auer; Judith Bjöhle; Sigrid Klaar; Ulrike Kronenwett; Edison T Liu; Lance Miller; Alexander Ploner; Johanna Smeds; Jonas Bergh; Yudi Pawitan Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2006 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Therese Sorlie; Robert Tibshirani; Joel Parker; Trevor Hastie; J S Marron; Andrew Nobel; Shibing Deng; Hilde Johnsen; Robert Pesich; Stephanie Geisler; Janos Demeter; Charles M Perou; Per E Lønning; Patrick O Brown; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; David Botstein Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2003-06-26 Impact factor: 12.779
Authors: Nicla La Verde; Elena Biagioli; Chiara Gerardi; Andrea Cordovana; Chiara Casiraghi; Irene Floriani; Elena Bernardin; Gabriella Farina; Serena Di Cosimo; Maria Chiara Dazzani; Giorgio Gherardi Journal: Springerplus Date: 2016-02-03
Authors: Eva Jezkova; Pavol Zubor; Karol Kajo; Marian Grendar; Karol Dokus; Marian Adamkov; Zora Lasabova; Lukas Plank; Jan Danko Journal: Oncol Lett Date: 2017-05-18 Impact factor: 2.967
Authors: Malcolm D Mattes; Jay K Bhatia; Daniel Metzger; Hani Ashamalla; Evangelia Katsoulakis Journal: J Breast Cancer Date: 2015-06-26 Impact factor: 3.588
Authors: G Houvenaeghel; R Sabatier; F Reyal; J M Classe; S Giard; H Charitansky; R Rouzier; C Faure; J R Garbay; E Daraï; D Hudry; P Gimbergues; R Villet; E Lambaudie Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2016-09-29 Impact factor: 7.640