Literature DB >> 18648848

Allometric scaling of isometric biceps strength in adult females and the effect of body mass index.

Robert F Zoeller1, Eric D Ryan, Heather Gordish-Dressman, Thomas B Price, Richard L Seip, Theodore J Angelopoulos, Niall M Moyna, Paul M Gordon, Paul D Thompson, Eric P Hoffman.   

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to (1) derive and test allometric scaling models of biceps isometric strength using body mass (BM) and muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) as the scaling variables, (2) assess the influence of body mass index (BMI) by separating the cohort by BMI (normal <25 kg/m(2) vs. overweight/obese > or =25 kg/m(2)) and repeating step 1, and (3) assess the effect of BMI on isometric strength allometrically adjusted for differences in CSA by comparing scaled strength between normal weight versus overweight/obese women. The participants were 183 women (18-39 years old) who reported no strength training in the prior year. Isometric strength and CSA of the biceps were assessed on the non-dominant arm. The CSA allometric model met all statistical criteria and produced a scaling exponent of 0.44. The BM model did not meet these criteria until the entire cohort was separated by BMI. The scaling exponents for normal weight and overweight/obese women were 1.48 and 0.35, respectively. These data suggest that BMI exerted an influence on the relationship between BM and allometrically scaled isometric strength and may be explained by previous studies demonstrating greater contribution of fat mass (FM) versus fat-free mass (FFM) to BMI in overweight/obese women. As such, allometric scaling models of isometric strength, especially in populations that are heterogeneous with regard to body composition, must be carefully tested and examined across the range of BMI. Isometric strength relative to CSA was not significantly different between groups. However, allometrically scaled strength, using CSA as the criterion variable, was significantly greater in overweight/obese women compared to those of normal weight. These data suggest that isometric strength in women is not completely determined by CSA and other factors such as intramuscular fat and muscle fiber type may be confounding or contributing factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18648848      PMCID: PMC4107660          DOI: 10.1007/s00421-008-0819-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  30 in total

1.  Interrelationships between muscle fibre type, substrate oxidation and body fat.

Authors:  J W Helge; A M Fraser; A D Kriketos; A B Jenkins; G D Calvert; K J Ayre; L H Storlien
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  1999-09

Review 2.  Normalizing physical performance tests for body size: a proposal for standardization.

Authors:  Slobodan Jaric; Dragan Mirkov; Goran Markovic
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Assessing agreement between measurements recorded on a ratio scale in sports medicine and sports science.

Authors:  A M Nevill; G Atkinson
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 13.800

4.  Muscle fibre type composition in infant and adult populations and relationships with obesity.

Authors:  A D Kriketos; L A Baur; J O'Connor; D Carey; S King; I D Caterson; L H Storlien
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  1997-09

5.  Allometric modeling does not determine a dimensionless power function ratio for maximal muscular function.

Authors:  A M Batterham; K P George
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1997-12

6.  Gender variations of body composition, muscle strength and power output in morbid obesity.

Authors:  C L Lafortuna; N A Maffiuletti; F Agosti; A Sartorio
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.095

7.  The relationship between body composition and muscle power output in men and women with obesity.

Authors:  C L Lafortuna; F Agosti; P G Marinone; N Marazzi; A Sartorio
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.256

8.  Voluntary strength, evoked twitch contractile properties and motor unit activation of knee extensors in obese and non-obese adolescent males.

Authors:  C J Blimkie; D G Sale; O Bar-Or
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1990

9.  Muscle fibre type and dimension in genetically obese and lean Zucker rats.

Authors:  D He; G Bolstad; A Brubakk; J I Medbø
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand       Date:  1995-09

10.  The muscle strength and size response to upper arm, unilateral resistance training among adults who are overweight and obese.

Authors:  Linda S Pescatello; Bethany K Kelsey; Thomas B Price; Richard L Seip; Theodore J Angelopoulos; Priscilla M Clarkson; Paul M Gordon; Niall M Moyna; Paul S Visich; Robert F Zoeller; Heather A Gordish-Dressman; Stephen M Bilbie; Paul D Thompson; Eric P Hoffman
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.775

View more
  3 in total

1.  Allometric scaling of 6-min walking distance by body mass as a standardized measure of exercise capacity in healthy adults.

Authors:  Victor Zuniga Dourado; Mary Ann McBurnie
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  The effects of anthropometric scaling parameters on normalized muscle strength in uninjured baseball pitchers.

Authors:  Wendy J Hurd; Bernard F Morrey; Kenton R Kaufman
Journal:  J Sport Rehabil       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.931

3.  Influences of Obesity on Job Demands and Worker Capacity.

Authors:  Lora A Cavuoto; Maury A Nussbaum
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2014-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.