Literature DB >> 22075639

Allometric scaling of 6-min walking distance by body mass as a standardized measure of exercise capacity in healthy adults.

Victor Zuniga Dourado1, Mary Ann McBurnie.   

Abstract

Body mass (BM) is a confounding variable in human performance. We hypothesized that adjusting 6-min walk distance (6MWD) for BM differences using allometric scaling would allow meaningful individual and group comparisons. We aimed to use allometric scaling of 6MWD to BM to provide an index for comparing walking performance in middle-aged and older adults. One hundred and twenty subjects (40-87 years) participated. Anthropometry, spirometry, and two walk tests were evaluated. We adjusted 6MWD to BM, gender, and age using an allometric procedure. The allometric exponents were prospectively applied in a validation sample of 44 healthy subjects. Body mass presented significant negative correlation (p < 0.01) with 6MWD · BM(-1) in middle-aged and older adults (r = -0.70 and -0.46, respectively). The allometric exponent (b) for 6MWD was significantly higher for older than middle-aged adults (0.35 ± 0.20 vs. 0.11 ± 0.08, respectively). The resulting BM exponents were similar in male and female subjects (0.22 ± 0.13 and 0.17 ± 0.09, respectively). The correlation between 6MWD · BM(-b ) and BM using the exponents (0.11 or 0.35) was not statistically different from zero (r = 0.00) in the validation sample, suggesting that allometric analysis did not penalize the subjects based on BM. Allometric scaling of 6MWD in middle-aged and older adults may be useful for evaluating walking performance free of the confounding effect of BM, even in the absence of a table of norms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22075639     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-011-2222-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  29 in total

1.  ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 21.405

2.  Six minute walk distance in healthy subjects aged 55-75 years.

Authors:  Bernadine Camarri; Peter R Eastwood; Nola M Cecins; Philip J Thompson; Sue Jenkins
Journal:  Respir Med       Date:  2005-10-17       Impact factor: 3.415

3.  Longitudinal profiles of oxygen uptake during treadmill walking in able-bodied children: the locomotion energy and growth study.

Authors:  Don W Morgan; Wayland Tseh; Jennifer L Caputo; Daniel J Keefer; Ian S Craig; Kelly B Griffith; Mary-Beth Akins; Gareth E Griffith; Philip E Martin
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.840

4.  Moving on land: an explanation of pedometer counts in children.

Authors:  Joey C Eisenmann; Eric E Wickel
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-10-21       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Six minute walking distance in healthy elderly subjects.

Authors:  T Troosters; R Gosselink; M Decramer
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 16.671

6.  The 6-min walk test: a quick measure of functional status in elderly adults.

Authors:  Paul L Enright; Mary Ann McBurnie; Vera Bittner; Russell P Tracy; Robert McNamara; Alice Arnold; Anne B Newman
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  Predictors of 6-minute walk test and 12-minute walk/run test in obese children and adolescents.

Authors:  Patrick Calders; Benedicte Deforche; Sabine Verschelde; Jacques Bouckaert; Frederic Chevalier; Eddy Bassle; Ann Tanghe; Patrick De Bode; Hilde Franckx
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 3.183

8.  Physiological responses to the 6-min walk test in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  T Troosters; J Vilaro; R Rabinovich; A Casas; J A Barberà; R Rodriguez-Roisin; J Roca
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 16.671

Review 9.  Sarcopenia and age-related changes in body composition and functional capacity.

Authors:  W J Evans; W W Campbell
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.798

10.  Reference equations for the six-minute walk in healthy adults.

Authors:  P L Enright; D L Sherrill
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 21.405

View more
  1 in total

1.  Intensity and physiological responses to the 6-minute walk test in middle-aged and older adults: a comparison with cardiopulmonary exercise testing.

Authors:  E F Sperandio; R L Arantes; A C Matheus; R P Silva; V T Lauria; M Romiti; A R T Gagliardi; V Z Dourado
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 2.590

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.