Literature DB >> 18648605

Targeted radiotherapy: microgray doses and the bystander effect.

Robert J Mairs1, Natasha E Fullerton, Michael R Zalutsky, Marie Boyd.   

Abstract

Indirect effects may contribute to the efficacy of radiotherapy by sterilizing malignant cells that are not directly irradiated. However, little is known of the influence of indirect effects in targeted radionuclide treatment. We compared gamma-radiation-induced bystander effects with those resulting from exposure to three radiohaloanalogues of meta-iodoben-zylguanidine (MIBG): [(131)I]MIBG (low linear energy transfer (LET) alpha-emitter), [(123)I]MIBG (high LET Auger electron emitter), and meta-[(211)At]astatobenzylguanidine ([(211)At]MABG) (high LET alpha-emitter). Cells exposed to media from gamma-irradiated cells exhibited a dose-dependent reduction in survival fraction at low dosage and a plateau in cell kill at > 2 Gy. Cells treated with media from [(131)I]MIBG demonstrated a dose-response relationship with respect to clonogenic cell death and no annihilation of this effect at high radiopharmaceutical dosage. In contrast, cells receiving media from cultures treated with [(211)At]MABG or [(123)I]MIBG exhibited dose-dependent toxicity at low dose but elimination of cytotoxicity with increasing radiation dose (i.e. U-shaped survival curves). Therefore radionuclides emitting high LET radiation may elicit toxic or protective effects on neighboring untargeted cells at low and high dose respectively. We conclude that radiopharmaceutical-induced bystander effects may depend on LET and be distinct from those elicited by conventional radiotherapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Radiopharmaceutical-induced bystander effect

Year:  2007        PMID: 18648605      PMCID: PMC2477696          DOI: 10.2203/dose-response.07-002.Mairs

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dose Response        ISSN: 1559-3258            Impact factor:   2.658


  29 in total

Review 1.  Radiation-induced genomic instability and bystander effects: related inflammatory-type responses to radiation-induced stress and injury? A review.

Authors:  S A Lorimore; E G Wright
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.694

2.  Genomic instability and bystander effects: a historical perspective.

Authors:  John B Little
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2003-10-13       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 3.  Is there a common mechanism underlying genomic instability, bystander effects and other nontargeted effects of exposure to ionizing radiation?

Authors:  William F Morgan
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2003-10-13       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 4.  Radiation-induced bystander effects--implications for cancer.

Authors:  Carmel Mothersill; Colin B Seymour
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 5.  Nuclear medicine therapy of neuroblastoma.

Authors:  C A Hoefnagel
Journal:  Q J Nucl Med       Date:  1999-12

6.  Relative contribution of bystander and targeted cell killing to the low-dose region of the radiation dose-response curve.

Authors:  C B Seymour; C Mothersill
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  Medium from irradiated human epithelial cells but not human fibroblasts reduces the clonogenic survival of unirradiated cells.

Authors:  C Mothersill; C Seymour
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.694

8.  Free radical-initiated and gap junction-mediated bystander effect due to nonuniform distribution of incorporated radioactivity in a three-dimensional tissue culture model.

Authors:  A Bishayee; H Z Hill; D Stein; D V Rao; R W Howell
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.841

9.  Comparison of the sodium dependency of uptake of meta-lodobenzylguanidine and norepinephrine into cultured bovine adrenomedullary cells.

Authors:  S Jaques; M C Tobes; J C Sisson; J A Baker; D M Wieland
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 4.436

10.  Direct evidence for the participation of gap junction-mediated intercellular communication in the transmission of damage signals from alpha -particle irradiated to nonirradiated cells.

Authors:  E I Azzam; S M de Toledo; J B Little
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-01-09       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Clinical radioimmunotherapy--the role of radiobiology.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Pouget; Isabelle Navarro-Teulon; Manuel Bardiès; Nicolas Chouin; Guillaume Cartron; André Pèlegrin; David Azria
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 2.  Applications of 211At and 223Ra in targeted alpha-particle radiotherapy.

Authors:  Ganesan Vaidyanathan; Michael R Zalutsky
Journal:  Curr Radiopharm       Date:  2011-10

3.  Systemic Endoradiotherapy with Carrier-Added 4-[(131)I]Iodo-L-Phenylalanine: Clinical Proof-of-Principle in Refractory Glioma.

Authors:  Richard P Baum; Andreas Kluge; Franz Josef Gildehaus; Marcus Bronzel; Karl Schmidt; Christiane Schuchardt; Stephan Senftleben; Samuel Samnick
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-11-16

4.  Towards translation of 212Pb as a clinical therapeutic; getting the lead in!

Authors:  Kwon Yong; Martin W Brechbiel
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 4.390

Review 5.  Norepinephrine Transporter as a Target for Imaging and Therapy.

Authors:  Neeta Pandit-Taskar; Shakeel Modak
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  γ-Radiation promotes immunological recognition of cancer cells through increased expression of cancer-testis antigens in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Anu Sharma; Beata Bode; Roland H Wenger; Kuno Lehmann; Alessandro A Sartori; Holger Moch; Alexander Knuth; Lotta von Boehmer; Maries van den Broek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Comparative gene expression analysis after exposure to 123I-iododeoxyuridine, γ- and α-radiation-potential biomarkers for the discrimination of radiation qualities.

Authors:  Marcus Unverricht-Yeboah; Ulrich Giesen; Ralf Kriehuber
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 2.724

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.