BACKGROUND: There are documented associations between elevated maternal corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) levels and adverse pregnancy outcomes. However, reports of these findings often lack sufficient detail and rationale regarding the bioassay methodology. This shortcoming can be problematic for researchers who do not possess in-depth laboratory sciences knowledge but who want to include bioassays in their investigations or to evaluate published reports. The quality and reliability of CRH measurement results can be significantly affected by variables encountered during sample collection, processing, storage, and bioassay. Thus, it is important to establish research laboratory protocols that are based on well-informed rationales and to carefully consider and control for relevant variables. APPROACH: A synthesis of laboratory sciences literature regarding variables affecting CRH measurement in pregnancy is presented. Additionally, consultation with experienced researchers provided an in-depth understanding of CRH measurement. From these sources, a laboratory protocol for clinical research was developed. RESULTS: Multiple variables that are specific to the reliability of CRH measurement in pregnancy have been identified. These include sample collection methods, sample processing, sample integrity, sample storage, and the actual assay selected. CONCLUSION: The reliability of CRH measurements can be significantly improved by identifying and controlling for variables encountered during sample collection, processing, storage, and bioassay. Adequate methodological details are difficult to glean solely from the published literature, thus consultation with well-informed researchers is necessary. A protocol for CRH bioassay in clinical research is proposed.
BACKGROUND: There are documented associations between elevated maternal corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) levels and adverse pregnancy outcomes. However, reports of these findings often lack sufficient detail and rationale regarding the bioassay methodology. This shortcoming can be problematic for researchers who do not possess in-depth laboratory sciences knowledge but who want to include bioassays in their investigations or to evaluate published reports. The quality and reliability of CRH measurement results can be significantly affected by variables encountered during sample collection, processing, storage, and bioassay. Thus, it is important to establish research laboratory protocols that are based on well-informed rationales and to carefully consider and control for relevant variables. APPROACH: A synthesis of laboratory sciences literature regarding variables affecting CRH measurement in pregnancy is presented. Additionally, consultation with experienced researchers provided an in-depth understanding of CRH measurement. From these sources, a laboratory protocol for clinical research was developed. RESULTS: Multiple variables that are specific to the reliability of CRH measurement in pregnancy have been identified. These include sample collection methods, sample processing, sample integrity, sample storage, and the actual assay selected. CONCLUSION: The reliability of CRH measurements can be significantly improved by identifying and controlling for variables encountered during sample collection, processing, storage, and bioassay. Adequate methodological details are difficult to glean solely from the published literature, thus consultation with well-informed researchers is necessary. A protocol for CRH bioassay in clinical research is proposed.
Authors: K Erickson; P Thorsen; G Chrousos; D E Grigoriadis; O Khongsaly; J McGregor; J Schulkin Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Shaun McGrath; Mark McLean; David Smith; Andrew Bisits; Warwick Giles; Roger Smith Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: R Jeanne Ruiz; Susan Gennaro; Caitlin O'Connor; Alok Dwivedi; Anne Gibeau; Tayra Keshinover; Tia Welsh Journal: Biol Res Nurs Date: 2015-10-27 Impact factor: 2.522
Authors: Emily S Barrett; Matthew Corsetti; Drew Day; Sally W Thurston; Christine T Loftus; Catherine J Karr; Kurunthachalam Kannan; Kaja Z LeWinn; Alicia K Smith; Roger Smith; Frances A Tylavsky; Nicole R Bush; Sheela Sathyanarayana Journal: Environ Int Date: 2022-01-07 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Kehinde Sola Akinlade; Adedeji David Atere; John Ayodele Olaniyi; Sheu Kadiri Rahamon; Christiana Odunayo Adewale Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-11-04 Impact factor: 3.240