C J Hobel1, C P Arora, L M Korst. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Burns and Allen Research Institute, Los Angeles, California 90048, USA. HobelC@CSHS.org
Abstract
BACKGROUND: During pregnancy in the second and third trimester there is a progressive rise in plasma CRH thought to be secreted by the placenta. Plasma CRH-BP inactivates CRH, which may prevent its peripheral action on the maternal pituitary and myometrium. In the last few weeks of pregnancy CRH-BP decreases, thereby causing an increase in free CRH or a CRH/CRH-BP complex available to play a role in the onset of parturition. OBJECTIVE: We tested the hypothesis that differences in CRH, CRH-BP, or a CRH/CRH-BP complex in patients at risk for preterm birth (PTB) and hypertension (HYP) account for the differences in the timing of parturition. METHODS: From a Behavior in Pregnancy Study database, we identified 18 patients who had spontaneous PTB and 23 patients who developed HYP. Both groups were case controlled and matched with patients who delivered at term (Normal). Maternal plasma samples had been appropriately collected from these patients at 18-20, 28-30, and 35-36 weeks gestational age. CRH levels were measured by double antibody RIA kit and the CRH-BP by a immunoradiometric technique. A CRH-BP/CRH dimer complex index was calculated. Statistical analysis was done using Kruskal-Wallis test for two cases. RESULTS: Maternal CRH (pg/ml) in the PTB cases compared to the HYP cases was significantly elevated at all three time periods. Maternal CRH-BP (pg/ml) in the PTB versus HYP cases was significantly lower at all three time periods in the PTB cases compared to the HYP cases. Maternal CRH-BP/CRH dimer complex index was significantly lower in the PTB cases at all three time periods than either the controls or the HYP cases, suggesting excessive CRH. The mean GA at delivery for the PTB cases was significantly lower than the control or HYP cases. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that those patients at risk for PTB have significantly elevated CRH, lower CRH-BP, and a reduced CRH-BP/CRH dimer complex index at all three time periods of assessment.
BACKGROUND: During pregnancy in the second and third trimester there is a progressive rise in plasma CRH thought to be secreted by the placenta. Plasma CRH-BP inactivates CRH, which may prevent its peripheral action on the maternal pituitary and myometrium. In the last few weeks of pregnancy CRH-BP decreases, thereby causing an increase in free CRH or a CRH/CRH-BP complex available to play a role in the onset of parturition. OBJECTIVE: We tested the hypothesis that differences in CRH, CRH-BP, or a CRH/CRH-BP complex in patients at risk for preterm birth (PTB) and hypertension (HYP) account for the differences in the timing of parturition. METHODS: From a Behavior in Pregnancy Study database, we identified 18 patients who had spontaneous PTB and 23 patients who developed HYP. Both groups were case controlled and matched with patients who delivered at term (Normal). Maternal plasma samples had been appropriately collected from these patients at 18-20, 28-30, and 35-36 weeks gestational age. CRH levels were measured by double antibody RIA kit and the CRH-BP by a immunoradiometric technique. A CRH-BP/CRH dimer complex index was calculated. Statistical analysis was done using Kruskal-Wallis test for two cases. RESULTS: Maternal CRH (pg/ml) in the PTB cases compared to the HYP cases was significantly elevated at all three time periods. Maternal CRH-BP (pg/ml) in the PTB versus HYP cases was significantly lower at all three time periods in the PTB cases compared to the HYP cases. Maternal CRH-BP/CRH dimer complex index was significantly lower in the PTB cases at all three time periods than either the controls or the HYP cases, suggesting excessive CRH. The mean GA at delivery for the PTB cases was significantly lower than the control or HYP cases. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that those patients at risk for PTB have significantly elevated CRH, lower CRH-BP, and a reduced CRH-BP/CRH dimer complex index at all three time periods of assessment.
Authors: Hannah E Jones; Kathryn A Harris; Malika Azizia; Lindsay Bank; Bernadette Carpenter; John C Hartley; Nigel Klein; Donald Peebles Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-12-08 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Emily W Harville; David A Savitz; Nancy Dole; Amy H Herring; John M Thorp Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Beate Ritz; Jiaheng Qiu; Pei-Chen Lee; Fred Lurmann; Bryan Penfold; Robert Erin Weiss; Rob McConnell; Chander Arora; Calvin Hobel; Michelle Wilhelm Journal: Environ Res Date: 2014-02-08 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: A Dubicke; A Akerud; M Sennstrom; R Rafik Hamad; B Bystrom; A Malmstrom; G Ekman-Ordeberg Journal: Mol Hum Reprod Date: 2008-10-15 Impact factor: 4.025