Literature DB >> 18641400

ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection VIII: cycles from January to December 2005 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2006.

V Goossens1, G Harton, C Moutou, P N Scriven, J Traeger-Synodinos, K Sermon, J C Harper.   

Abstract

The eighth report of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology PGD Consortium is presented documenting cycles collected for the calendar year 2005 and follow-up of the pregnancies and babies born until October 2006 which resulted from these cycles. For the first time, the delivery rates for each indication are presented and also the pregnancy rates for each centre are reported anonymously. Since the first data collections, there has been a steady increase in the number of cycles, pregnancies and babies reported annually. For data collection VIII, 39 centres have participated, reporting on 3488 cycles to oocyte retrieval (OR), along with details of the follow-up on 845 pregnancies and 670 babies born. Five hundred and twenty OR were reported for chromosomal abnormalities, 108 OR for sexing for X-linked diseases, 500 OR for monogenic diseases, 2275 OR for preimplantation genetic screening and 85 OR for social sexing. Data VIII is compared with the cumulative data for data collections I-VII.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18641400     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/den238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  19 in total

1.  Preconceptional diagnosis for Robertsonian translocation as an alternative to preimplantation genetic diagnosis in two situations: a pilot study.

Authors:  D Molina Gomes; I Hammoud; M Bailly; M Bergere; R Wainer; J Selva; F Vialard
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Polar body biopsy in the diagnosis of monogenic diseases: the birth of three healthy children.

Authors:  Georg Griesinger; Nana Bündgen; Diana Salmen; Eberhard Schwinger; Gabriele Gillessen-Kaesbach; Klaus Diedrich
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 3.  Preimplantation genetic screening: does it help or hinder IVF treatment and what is the role of the embryo?

Authors:  Kim Dao Ly; Ashok Agarwal; Zsolt Peter Nagy
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Factors Influencing the Decision-Making Process and Long-Term Interpersonal Outcomes for Parents Who Undergo Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis for Fanconi Anemia: a Qualitative Investigation.

Authors:  K Haude; P McCarthy Veach; B LeRoy; H Zierhut
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of P450 oxidoreductase deficiency and Huntington Disease using three different molecular approaches simultaneously.

Authors:  Trinitat M Alberola; Rosa Bautista-Llácer; Esther Fernández; Xavier Vendrell; Manuel Pérez-Alonso
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Quantitative decision-making in preimplantation genetic (aneuploidy) screening (PGS).

Authors:  Michael C Summers; Andrew D Foland
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  A clinical perspective on ethical arguments around prenatal diagnosis and preimplantation genetic diagnosis for later onset inherited cancer predispositions.

Authors:  Tara Clancy
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 8.  Conceptualizing couples' decision making in PGD: emerging cognitive, emotional, and moral dimensions.

Authors:  Patricia E Hershberger; Penny F Pierce
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-01-08

9.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for myotonic dystrophy type 1: upon request to child.

Authors:  Marjan De Rademaeker; Willem Verpoest; Martine De Rycke; Sara Seneca; Karen Sermon; Sonja Desmyttere; Maryse Bonduelle; Josianne Van der Elst; Paul Devroey; Inge Liebaers
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 4.246

10.  What next for preimplantation genetic screening? High mitotic chromosome instability rate provides the biological basis for the low success rate.

Authors:  Evelyne Vanneste; Thierry Voet; Cindy Melotte; Sophie Debrock; Karen Sermon; Catherine Staessen; Inge Liebaers; Jean-Pierre Fryns; Thomas D'Hooghe; Joris R Vermeesch
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 6.918

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.