Literature DB >> 18640934

Impact of immediate versus delayed axillary node dissection on surgical outcomes in breast cancer patients with positive sentinel nodes: results from American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Trials Z0010 and Z0011.

John A Olson1, Linda M McCall, Peter Beitsch, Pat W Whitworth, Douglas S Reintgen, Peter W Blumencranz, A Marilyn Leitch, Sukamal Saha, Kelly K Hunt, Armando E Giuliano.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Patients with breast cancer metastasis to the sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) generally undergo completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND), either concurrently with SLN biopsy or at a second procedure. The impact of the timing of cALND on pathologic results and complications in these patients has not been examined. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We examined outcomes from SLN-positive patients in American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) trials Z0010 and Z0011. Pathologic data examined included primary tumor characteristics, total number of SLNs recovered, positive SLN(s) and non-SLN(s) identified. Complications assessed included axillary seroma, paresthesia, arm morbidity and range of motion, and lymphedema.
RESULTS: A total of 1,003 assessable patients with SLN metastasis had immediate (n = 425) or delayed (n = 578) cALND. The median number of SLNs and axillary LNs removed were the same between groups. Patients who had immediate cALND more often had larger tumors, SLN metastasis identified intraoperatively, two or more positive SLNs, and higher pathologic N stage. Axillary paresthesia, seroma, and impaired extremity range of motion were more common in the immediate group during the early postoperative period, but not at later time points. There was no difference in lymphedema at any time point.
CONCLUSION: In ACOSOG trials Z0010 and Z0011, LN recovery and long-term complications were similar after either delayed or immediate cALND for patients with metastasis to SLNs. Patients who undergo immediate cALND experience more short-term morbidity. With respect to staging and complications, there is no clear detriment for patients with a positive SLN who undergo a second procedure for cALND.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18640934     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.5630

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  34 in total

1.  Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Nomogram to predict the risk of non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in Japanese breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Tatsunari Sasada; Shigeru Murakami; Tsuyoshi Kataoka; Masahiro Ohara; Shinji Ozaki; Morihito Okada; Hideki Ohdan
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 2.  What can we learn from oncology surgical trials?

Authors:  Serge Evrard; Pippa McKelvie-Sebileau; Cornelis van de Velde; Bernard Nordlinger; Graeme Poston
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Use of sentinel lymph node biopsy to select patients for local-regional therapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Lillian M Erdahl; Judy C Boughey
Journal:  Curr Breast Cancer Rep       Date:  2014-03

4.  Intra-operative use of one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) for detection of the tumor load of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Thorsten Heilmann; Micaela Mathiak; Jakob Hofmann; Christoph Mundhenke; Marion van Mackelenbergh; Ibrahim Alkatout; Antonia Wenners; Christel Eckmann-Scholz; Christian Schem
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Completing the Dissection in Melanoma: Increasing Decision Precision.

Authors:  Mark B Faries
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  The role of organizational affiliations and research networks in the diffusion of breast cancer treatment innovation.

Authors:  William R Carpenter; Katherine Reeder-Hayes; John Bainbridge; Anne-Marie Meyer; Keith D Amos; Bryan J Weiner; Paul A Godley
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Patterns of nodal staging during breast conservation surgery in the medicare patient: will the ACOSOG Z0011 trial change the pattern of care?

Authors:  Catherine E Loveland-Jones; Karen Ruth; Elin R Sigurdson; Brian L Egleston; Marcia Boraas; Richard J Bleicher
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-01-19       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Personalized axillary dissection: the number of excised lymph nodes of nodal-positive breast cancer patients has no significant impact on relapse-free and overall survival.

Authors:  Florian Ebner; Achim Wöckel; Wolfgang Janni; Rolf Kreienberg; Lukas Schwentner; Manfred Wischnewsky
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 4.553

9.  Axillary dissection versus no axillary dissection in patients with sentinel-node micrometastases (IBCSG 23-01): a phase 3 randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Viviana Galimberti; Bernard F Cole; Stefano Zurrida; Giuseppe Viale; Alberto Luini; Paolo Veronesi; Paola Baratella; Camelia Chifu; Manuela Sargenti; Mattia Intra; Oreste Gentilini; Mauro G Mastropasqua; Giovanni Mazzarol; Samuele Massarut; Jean-Rémi Garbay; Janez Zgajnar; Hanne Galatius; Angelo Recalcati; David Littlejohn; Monika Bamert; Marco Colleoni; Karen N Price; Meredith M Regan; Aron Goldhirsch; Alan S Coates; Richard D Gelber; Umberto Veronesi
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 41.316

10.  Quality of life after axillary or groin sentinel lymph node biopsy, with or without completion lymph node dissection, in patients with cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  Mattijs de Vries; Harald J Hoekstra; Josette E H M Hoekstra-Weebers
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.