Literature DB >> 24442687

Patterns of nodal staging during breast conservation surgery in the medicare patient: will the ACOSOG Z0011 trial change the pattern of care?

Catherine E Loveland-Jones1, Karen Ruth, Elin R Sigurdson, Brian L Egleston, Marcia Boraas, Richard J Bleicher.   

Abstract

ACOSOG Z0011 spares axillary dissection (AD) in breast conservation surgery (BCS) patients with T1/T2 tumors and 1-2 positive nodes. Current patterns of care and the impact of Z0011 on AD versus additional surgery rates for Medicare patients undergoing BCS are unknown. SEER data linked to Medicare claims for 1999-2005 were reviewed for women with invasive nonmetastatic breast cancer who underwent nodal staging on the same day as BCS. There were 3,280 women with T1/T2 tumors and positive nodes who underwent same-day nodal staging; 2,532 (77.2 %) of these women had 1-2 positive nodes. Assuming 25.7 % have extracapsular extension, 651 women would require AD. However, 1,881 women, or 57.4 % of those with T1/T2 tumors and positive nodes, would be spared AD. Meanwhile, among the 748 women having ≥ 3 positive nodes, 579 underwent same-day AD, but under Z0011, would now wait for permanent section. A total of 160 of these women underwent re-excision or completion mastectomy at a later date anyway, when delayed AD could be performed. The remaining 419 women with ≥ 3 positive nodes would require an additional surgery date for the sole purpose of completion AD. The Z0011 paradigm would consequently necessitate an additional surgery date for 1,070 (651 + 419) women, or 32.6 % of those with T1/T2 tumors and positive nodes. The Z0011 paradigm appears to increase the number of Medicare patients undergoing BCS who require an additional surgery date but decrease the number requiring AD to a greater extent. Future changes in the use of AD or axillary irradiation may yet modify that impact substantially.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24442687      PMCID: PMC4161134          DOI: 10.1007/s10549-014-2834-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  26 in total

Review 1.  Proceedings of the consensus conference on the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in carcinoma of the breast, April 19-22, 2001, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Gordon F Schwartz; Armando E Giuliano; Umberto Veronesi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  I. The Results of Operations for the Cure of Cancer of the Breast Performed at the Johns Hopkins Hospital from June, 1889, to January, 1894.

Authors:  W S Halsted
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1894-11       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Preoperative delays in the US Medicare population with breast cancer.

Authors:  Richard J Bleicher; Karen Ruth; Elin R Sigurdson; Eric Ross; Yu-Ning Wong; Sameer A Patel; Marcia Boraas; Neal S Topham; Brian L Egleston
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Prospective observational study of sentinel lymphadenectomy without further axillary dissection in patients with sentinel node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  A E Giuliano; P I Haigh; M B Brennan; N M Hansen; M C Kelley; W Ye; E C Glass; R R Turner
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Final results of the Department of Defense multicenter breast lymphatic mapping trial.

Authors:  Steve Shivers; Charles Cox; George Leight; Daniel Beauchamp; Peter Blumencranz; Merrick Ross; Douglas Reintgen
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Armando E Giuliano; Kelly K Hunt; Karla V Ballman; Peter D Beitsch; Pat W Whitworth; Peter W Blumencranz; A Marilyn Leitch; Sukamal Saha; Linda M McCall; Monica Morrow
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Does the introduction of sentinel node biopsy increase the number of node positive patients with early breast cancer? A population based study form the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group.

Authors:  Anders Husted Madsen; Anni Ravnsbaek Jensen; Peer Christiansen; Jens Peter Garne; Soeren Cold; Marianne Ewertz; Jens Overgaard
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.089

8.  Surgical complications associated with sentinel lymph node biopsy: results from a prospective international cooperative group trial.

Authors:  Lee Gravatt Wilke; Linda M McCall; Katherine E Posther; Pat W Whitworth; Douglas S Reintgen; A Marilyn Leitch; Sheryl G A Gabram; Anthony Lucci; Charles E Cox; Kelly K Hunt; James E Herndon; Armando E Giuliano
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Impact of immediate versus delayed axillary node dissection on surgical outcomes in breast cancer patients with positive sentinel nodes: results from American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Trials Z0010 and Z0011.

Authors:  John A Olson; Linda M McCall; Peter Beitsch; Pat W Whitworth; Douglas S Reintgen; Peter W Blumencranz; A Marilyn Leitch; Sukamal Saha; Kelly K Hunt; Armando E Giuliano
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-07-20       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  The sentinel node in breast cancer--a multicenter validation study.

Authors:  D Krag; D Weaver; T Ashikaga; F Moffat; V S Klimberg; C Shriver; S Feldman; R Kusminsky; M Gadd; J Kuhn; S Harlow; P Beitsch
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-10-01       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparative Study between Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Axillary Dissection in Patients with One or Two Lymph Node Metastases.

Authors:  Jina Lee; Jung Eun Choi; Sei Joong Kim; Sae Byul Lee; Min-Ki Seong; Joon Jeong; Chan Seok Yoon; Bong Kyun Kim; Woo Young Sun
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 3.588

2.  Clinical significance of extranodal extension in sentinel lymph node positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Xia Yang; XiaoXi Ma; Wentao Yang; Ruohong Shui
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.