Literature DB >> 18638585

Comparison of assessment of native coronary arteries by standard versus three-dimensional coronary angiography.

Pierfrancesco Agostoni1, Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai, Glenn Van Langenhove, Kristoff Cornelis, Paul Vermeersch, Carl Convens, Corrado Vassanelli, Paul Van Den Heuvel, Frank Van Den Branden, Stefan Verheye.   

Abstract

Vessel foreshortening is a major limitation of standard coronary angiography due to the 2-dimensional representation of 3-dimensional structures. Three-dimensional models may overcome it. The aim of this study was to compare measurements of coronary segments from quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) in an operator-selected "working view" of standard 2-dimensional coronary angiography with those from 3-dimensional coronary angiography (3D-CA) reconstruction models, which are automatically generated from software applied to rotational coronary angiographic acquisitions. Patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention were considered. Two or 3 segments of the artery needing treatment were prespecified, using bifurcations as edges. The operator selected a working view from standard angiography as the view best representing each segment. Rotational angiography was performed, allowing 3-dimensional reconstruction of the selected segments. Additionally a marker guidewire (with 4 markers 10 mm away from one another at the distal tip) was used to further measure segment length, and it was considered the "gold standard" reference. In 36 patients, 81 segments from 12 left anterior descending, 12 circumflex, and 12 right coronary arteries were evaluated. Three-dimensional coronary angiography was always feasible. Although reference vessel diameter was not different between 3D-CA and QCA (p >0.05), segment length measurements were on average 2.3 +/- 2.5 mm longer with 3D-CA than with QCA (p <0.001) and 0.4 +/- 1.8 mm longer than with marker guidewire measurement (p = 0.047). Marker guidewire measurements were 1.9 +/- 2.8 mm longer than QCA measurements (p <0.001). According to Bland-Altman plots, 3D-CA and marker guidewire measurements had the best agreement. In conclusion, 3-dimensional coronary modeling is highly feasible and yields more accurate assessments of the lengths of coronary segments than standard QCA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18638585     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.03.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  10 in total

1.  Measurement of peripheral arterial vasculature in domestic Yorkshire swine by using quantitative vascular angiography.

Authors:  Vanessa C Lopes-Berkas; Michael A Jorgenson
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.232

2.  Lossy JPEG compression in quantitative angiography: the role of X-ray quantum noise.

Authors:  Johannes Peter Fritsch; Rüdiger Brennecke
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 3.  Novel QCA methodologies and angiographic scores.

Authors:  Vivian G Ng; Alexandra J Lansky
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-02-20       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Two-by-two cross-over study to evaluate agreement between versions of a quantitative coronary analysis system (QAngio XA).

Authors:  Kayoko Kozuma; Kosuke Kashiwabara; Tomohiro Shinozaki; Ken Kozuma; Koji Oba; Yutaka Matsuyama
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-01-21       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Patient-specific computational fluid dynamics: structured mesh generation from coronary angiography.

Authors:  Gianluca De Santis; Peter Mortier; Matthieu De Beule; Patrick Segers; Pascal Verdonck; Benedict Verhegghe
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  A comparison of radiation dose between standard and 3D angiography in congenital heart disease.

Authors:  João Luiz Langer Manica; Mônica Scott Borges; Rogério Fachel de Medeiros; Leandro dos Santos Fischer; Gabriel Broetto; Raul Ivo Rossi Filho
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.000

7.  The Holistic Coronary Physiology Display: Calculation of the Flow Separation Index in Vessel-Specific Individual Flow Range during Fractional Flow Reserve Measurement Using 3D Coronary Reconstruction.

Authors:  Gábor Tamás Szabó; Áron Üveges; Balázs Tar; András Ágoston; Azzaya Dorj; Csaba Jenei; Rudolf Kolozsvári; Benjamin Csippa; Dániel Czuriga; Zsolt Kőszegi
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Three dimensional quantitative coronary angiography can detect reliably ischemic coronary lesions based on fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Woo-Young Chung; Byoung-Joo Choi; Seong-Hoon Lim; Yoshiki Matsuo; Ryan J Lennon; Rajiv Gulati; Gurpreet S Sandhu; David R Holmes; Charanjit S Rihal; Amir Lerman
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 2.153

9.  Assessment of obstruction length and optimal viewing angle from biplane X-ray angiograms.

Authors:  Shengxian Tu; Gerhard Koning; Wouter Jukema; Johan H C Reiber
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  Percutaneous coronary intervention in nonagenarians: pros and cons.

Authors:  Giuseppe Biondi Zoccai; Antonio Abbate; Fabrizio D'Ascenzo; Davide Presutti; Mariangela Peruzzi; Elena Cavarretta; Antonino G M Marullo; Marzia Lotrionte; Giacomo Frati
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.327

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.