Literature DB >> 20169463

Lossy JPEG compression in quantitative angiography: the role of X-ray quantum noise.

Johannes Peter Fritsch1, Rüdiger Brennecke.   

Abstract

In medical imaging, contrary to applications in the consumer market, the use of irreversible or lossy compression is still in its beginnings. This is due to the suspected risk of compromising the diagnostic content. Many studies have been performed, but it was not until 2008 that national activities in different countries resulted in recommendations for the safe use of irreversible image compression in clinical practice. Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), however, poses a special problem, since here a large variation in published maximum compression factors has strengthened the general concerns about the use of lossy techniques. Up to now, the reason for the variation has not been thoroughly investigated. Reasons for the discrepancies in published compression factors are determined in this study. Since JPEG compression reduces the quantum noise of the X-ray images, the impact of compression is overestimated when interpreting any change in local diameter as an error. By taking into consideration the quantitative effect of quantum noise in QCA, it is shown that the influence of JPEG compression can be neglected for compression factors up to ten at clinically applicable X-ray doses. This limit is comparable to that found by visual analysis for aesthetic image quality. Future studies on image compression effects should take the interaction with quantum noise explicitly into consideration.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20169463      PMCID: PMC3092038          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-010-9275-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  18 in total

1.  American College of Cardiology/ European Society of Cardiology international study of angiographic data compression phase III. Measurement Of image quality differences at varying levels of data compression.

Authors:  R Brennecke; U Bürgel; R Simon; G Rippin; H P Fritsch; T Becker; S E Nissen
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  American College of Cardiology/ European Society of Cardiology international study of angiographic data compression phase II. The effects of varying JPEG data compression levels on the quantitative assessment of the degree of stenosis in digital coronary angiography.

Authors:  J C Tuinenburg; G Koning; E Hekking; A H Zwinderman; T Becker; R Simon; J H Reiber
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  Patterns in visual interpretation of coronary arteriograms as detected by quantitative coronary arteriography.

Authors:  R M Fleming; R L Kirkeeide; R W Smalling; K L Gould
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Pan-Canadian evaluation of irreversible compression ratios ("lossy" compression) for development of national guidelines.

Authors:  David Koff; Peter Bak; Paul Brownrigg; Danoush Hosseinzadeh; April Khademi; Alex Kiss; Luigi Lepanto; Tracy Michalak; Harry Shulman; Andrew Volkening
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-10-18       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 5.  Quantitative coronary angiography in the current era: principles and applications.

Authors:  Paolo Garrone; Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai; Ilaria Salvetti; Noemi Sina; Imad Sheiban; Peter R Stella; Pierfrancesco Agostoni
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2009-07-13       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Impact of various compression rates on interpretation of digital coronary angiograms.

Authors:  S Silber; R Dörr; G Zindler; H Mühling; T Diebel
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  1997-07-25       Impact factor: 4.164

7.  An analytical look at the effects of compression on medical images.

Authors:  K Persons; P Palisson; A Manduca; B J Erickson; V Savcenko
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  Left ventricular border recognition using a dynamic search algorithm.

Authors:  D L Pope; D L Parker; P D Clayton; D E Gustafson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Compression of digital coronary angiograms does not affect visual or quantitative assessment of coronary artery stenosis severity.

Authors:  V H Rigolin; P A Robiolio; L A Spero; B P Harrawood; K G Morris; D F Fortin; W A Baker; T M Bashore; J T Cusma
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1996-07-15       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Variability in measures of coronary lumen dimensions using quantitative coronary angiography.

Authors:  D M Herrington; M Siebes; D K Sokol; C O Siu; G D Walford
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  1 in total

1.  "Evaluation of a very low-cost and simple teleradiology technique".

Authors:  Mahdieh Khodaie; Azam Askari; Kambiz Bahaadinbeigy
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.056

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.