Literature DB >> 18638522

Synesthetic congruency modulates the temporal ventriloquism effect.

Cesare Parise1, Charles Spence.   

Abstract

People sometimes find it easier to judge the temporal order in which two visual stimuli have been presented if one tone is presented before the first visual stimulus and a second tone is presented after the second visual stimulus. This enhancement of people's visual temporal sensitivity has been attributed to the temporal ventriloquism of the visual stimuli toward the temporally proximate sounds, resulting in an expansion of the perceived interval between the two visual events. In the present study, we demonstrate that the synesthetic congruency between the auditory and visual stimuli (in particular, between the relative pitch of the sounds and the relative size of the visual stimuli) can modulate the magnitude of this multisensory integration effect: The auditory capture of vision is larger for pairs of auditory and visual stimuli that are synesthetically congruent than for pairs of stimuli that are synesthetically incongruent, as reflected by participants' increased sensitivity in discriminating the temporal order of the visual stimuli. These results provide the first evidence that multisensory temporal integration can be affected by the synesthetic congruency between the auditory and visual stimuli that happen to be presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18638522     DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.07.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  23 in total

1.  Audiovisual crossmodal correspondences and sound symbolism: a study using the implicit association test.

Authors:  Cesare V Parise; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-06-17       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Crossmodal exogenous orienting improves the accuracy of temporal order judgments.

Authors:  Valerio Santangelo; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Effect of pitch-space correspondence on sound-induced visual motion perception.

Authors:  Souta Hidaka; Wataru Teramoto; Mirjam Keetels; Jean Vroomen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Evidence of sound symbolism in simple vocalizations.

Authors:  Cesare V Parise; Francesco Pavani
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Auditory dominance over vision in the perception of interval duration.

Authors:  David Burr; Martin S Banks; Maria Concetta Morrone
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The plausibility of visual information for hand ownership modulates multisensory synchrony perception.

Authors:  Regine Zopf; Jason Friedman; Mark A Williams
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-05-17       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Why we are not all synesthetes (not even weakly so).

Authors:  Ophelia Deroy; Charles Spence
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-08

Review 8.  Interactions of auditory and visual stimuli in space and time.

Authors:  Gregg H Recanzone
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  The effect of sound intensity on the audiotactile crossmodal dynamic capture effect.

Authors:  Valeria Occelli; Charles Spence; Massimiliano Zampini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The influence of phasic alerting on multisensory temporal precision.

Authors:  Qingqing Li; Peiduo Liu; Shunhang Huang; Xiting Huang
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.