Literature DB >> 18637409

Observations on mastoid versus ear canal recorded cochlear microphonic in newborns and adults.

Mariam Riazi1, John A Ferraro.   

Abstract

The cochlear microphonic (CM) may play an important role in the diagnosis of auditory neuropathy (AN) in newborns. However, since the CM tends to mirror the waveform of the acoustic stimulus, conscientious recording methodology must be applied to separate true response from artifact. The difficulty in achieving this separation has limited the clinical usefulness of the CM. In an effort to call attention to the importance of recording protocol when measuring the CM, the present study was designed to optimize CM recordings in humans by investigating the following parameters: (1) secondary minus electrode recording site (mastoid versus ear canal [EC]), (2) stimulus parameters, and (3) grounding and shielding conditions. Normative data were collected in full-term newborns (n = 7) and adults (n = 4) with no known risk factors for cochlear or retrocochlear pathology. Results suggest that the CM is easier to separate from stimulus artifact using an EC electrode and toneburst stimuli. In addition, electromagnetic shielding and grounding of the electrode cables and the acoustic transducer were effective in reducing and/or eliminating stimulus artifact. Results from this normative study may be helpful in improving the diagnostic utility of the CM in AN and other hearing-related disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18637409     DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.19.1.5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  5 in total

1.  Response pattern based on the amplitude of ear canal recorded cochlear microphonic waveforms across acoustic frequencies in normal hearing subjects.

Authors:  Ming Zhang
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2012-06-13

2.  A new auditory threshold estimation technique for low frequencies: proof of concept.

Authors:  Jeffery T Lichtenhan; Nigel P Cooper; John J Guinan
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Methods to eliminate stimulus transduction artifact from insert earphones during electroencephalography.

Authors:  Tom Campbell; Jess R Kerlin; Christopher W Bishop; Lee M Miller
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Effects of Stimulus Intensity on Low-Frequency Toneburst Cochlear Microphonic Waveforms.

Authors:  Ming Zhang
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2013-02-21

Review 5.  Study of cochlear microphonic potentials in auditory neuropathy.

Authors:  Ilka do Amaral Soares; Pedro de Lemos Menezes; Aline Tenório Lins Carnaúba; Kelly Cristina Lira de Andrade; Otávio Gomes Lins
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-04-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.