Literature DB >> 18635980

Automated device that complies with current guidelines for office blood pressure measurement: design and pilot application study of the Microlife WatchBP Office device.

George S Stergiou1, Che-Wei Lin, Chia-Ming Lin, Shih-Lung Chang, Athanasios D Protogerou, Dimitris Tzamouranis, Efthimia Nasothimiou, Ty-Minh Tan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Current guidelines for office blood pressure (BP) measurement recommend mercury devices, both arms measurement in the initial assessment and at least duplicate measurements at follow-up visits. This study presents the design and a pilot application study of an automated device that fulfils American, European, and International guidelines for office BP measurement. DESIGN AND FUNCTIONS: The Microlife WatchBP Office is a professional electronic mercury-free device with three function modes designed for: (a) initial assessment: triplicate automated simultaneous oscillometric both arms measurement at 60-s intervals and when there is a consistent interarm difference more than 20 mmHg systolic and/or more than 10 mmHg diastolic, the arm with the higher BP is indicated. (b) Follow-up assessment: triplicate automated oscillometric single arm measurements at 60-s intervals and their average is displayed. (c) Auscultatory measurement: by an observer using a stethoscope and a digital countdown BP display for patients with arrhythmias and other individuals in whom the oscillometric measurement is not accurate. PILOT APPLICATION STUDY: The 'initial assessment' mode was applied by three physicians in 63 patients (189 readings). Average interarm systolic BP difference was 0.04+/-5.1 mmHg and diastolic 0.4+/-3.2 mmHg. A value more than 10 mmHg interarm difference in nine systolic BP readings (5%) and three (2%) diastolic. No patient had a consistent interarm difference more than 10 mmHg in all three or two of the three readings.
CONCLUSION: The Microlife WatchBP Office professional device fulfils current international requirements for office BP measurement and seems to overcome several limitations of this method when applied in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18635980     DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e3283057a84

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Press Monit        ISSN: 1359-5237            Impact factor:   1.444


  8 in total

Review 1.  Automated Office-Based Blood Pressure Measurement: an Overview and Guidance for Implementation in Primary Care.

Authors:  Romsai T Boonyasai; Erika L McCannon; Joseph E Landavaso
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 5.369

2.  Practical Suitability of a Stand-Alone Oscillometric Central Blood Pressure Monitor: A Review of the Microlife WatchBP Office Central.

Authors:  Willem J Verberk; Hao-Min Cheng; Li-Chih Huang; Chia-Ming Lin; Yao-Pin Teng; Chen-Huan Chen
Journal:  Pulse (Basel)       Date:  2016-02-12

3.  Between-visit reproducibility of inter-arm systolic blood pressure differences in treated hypertensive patients: the coconet study.

Authors:  Jang Young Kim; Eung Ju Kim; June Namgung; Byung-Ryul Cho; Chang-Wook Nam; Young-Kwon Kim; Jeong Bae Park
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 3.872

4.  Seasonal variation in meteorological parameters and office, ambulatory and home blood pressure: predicting factors and clinical implications.

Authors:  George S Stergiou; Aikaterini Myrsilidi; Anastasios Kollias; Antonios Destounis; Leonidas Roussias; Petros Kalogeropoulos
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 3.872

5.  Unattended automated office blood pressure measurement: Time efficiency and barriers to implementation/utilization.

Authors:  John Doane; Michael Flynn; Marcus Archibald; Dominick Ramirez; Molly B Conroy; Barry Stults
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  A practice-based trial of blood pressure control in African Americans (TLC-Clinic): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Antoinette Schoenthaler; Leanne Luerassi; Jeanne A Teresi; Stephanie Silver; Jian Kong; Taiye Odedosu; Samantha Trilling; Anna Errico; Oshevire Uvwo; Kimberly Sebek; Adetutu Adekoya; Gbenga Ogedegbe
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 7.  Sources of inaccuracy in the measurement of adult patients' resting blood pressure in clinical settings: a systematic review.

Authors:  Noa Kallioinen; Andrew Hill; Mark S Horswill; Helen E Ward; Marcus O Watson
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.844

8.  Clinical relevance of double-arm blood pressure measurement and prevalence of clinically important inter-arm blood pressure differences in Indian primary care.

Authors:  Gurpreet S Wander; Sinead T J McDonagh; M Srinivasa Rao; R Alagesan; J C Mohan; Ajit Bhagwat; A K Pancholia; M Viswanathan; Manoj Bhavrilal Chopda; A Purnanand; P L N Kapardhi; Arun R Vadavi; R Selvaraj; Pankaj Aneja; Suhas Hardas; Neil Bordoloi; N Sivakadaksham; Nilesh Goswami; Christopher E Clark; Willem J Verberk
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2022-07-10       Impact factor: 2.885

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.