Literature DB >> 28003649

Between-visit reproducibility of inter-arm systolic blood pressure differences in treated hypertensive patients: the coconet study.

Jang Young Kim1, Eung Ju Kim2, June Namgung3, Byung-Ryul Cho4, Chang-Wook Nam5, Young-Kwon Kim6, Jeong Bae Park7.   

Abstract

Inter-arm systolic blood pressure (BP) differences (sIADs) have recently been recognized as a risk factor for cardiovascular mortality. However, sIAD reproducibility remains unresolved from a controlled trial perspective. We evaluated the between-visit reproducibility of sIADs in hypertensive patients. We examined 1875 hypertensive participants aged 20 years and older (mean age: 62.3 years, 45.4% female) from nine primary clinics and 27 secondary and tertiary hospitals. The BPs in both arms were automatically and simultaneously measured in triplicate with a cuff-oscillometric BP device. BP measurements were obtained at baseline and at 3-month follow-up time points. Increased sIAD was defined as an absolute difference of ⩾10 mm Hg in the average systolic BPs between the left and right arms. The overall mean sIAD was 4.33±4.17 mm Hg. The prevalences of increased sIAD at baseline and at the 3-month measurements were 7.6% and 7.1%, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient for the between-visit sIADs was 0.304 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.262-0.344). The κ-value between the baseline and follow-up increased sIADs was 0.165 (95% CI 0.096-0.234). The percentage of patients who exhibited an increased sIAD at 3 months compared with the initially increased sIAD at baseline was 21.8%. The reproducibility of sIAD determination between baseline and the 3-month follow-up measurements lacked agreement in the hypertensive patients. Further studies should identify the relevant variables and characteristics of this poor reproducibility (CRIS number; KCT0001235).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28003649     DOI: 10.1038/hr.2016.173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertens Res        ISSN: 0916-9636            Impact factor:   3.872


  19 in total

Review 1.  Association of a difference in systolic blood pressure between arms with vascular disease and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Christopher E Clark; Rod S Taylor; Angela C Shore; Obioha C Ukoumunne; John L Campbell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Patient characteristics and factors associated with inter-arm difference of blood pressure measurements in a general population in Ohasama, Japan.

Authors:  Atsushi Kimura; Junichiro Hashimoto; Daisuke Watabe; Hisaki Takahashi; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Masahiro Kikuya; Yutaka Imai
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.844

3.  Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals: Part 1: blood pressure measurement in humans: a statement for professionals from the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research.

Authors:  Thomas G Pickering; John E Hall; Lawrence J Appel; Bonita E Falkner; John Graves; Martha N Hill; Daniel W Jones; Theodore Kurtz; Sheldon G Sheps; Edward J Roccella
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2004-12-20       Impact factor: 10.190

4.  The reproducibility of average ambulatory, home, and clinic pressures.

Authors:  G D James; T G Pickering; L S Yee; G A Harshfield; S Riva; J H Laragh
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 5.  Association of an inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality: An updated meta-analysis of cohort studies.

Authors:  Kaiwu Cao; Jingsong Xu; Qing Shangguan; Weitong Hu; Ping Li; Xiaoshu Cheng; Hai Su
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2015-04-12       Impact factor: 4.164

6.  Blood pressure measurement method and inter-arm differences: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Willem J Verberk; Alfons G H Kessels; Theo Thien
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 2.689

7.  Prognostic significance of between-arm blood pressure differences.

Authors:  Rajiv Agarwal; Zerihun Bunaye; Dagim M Bekele
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 10.190

8.  Automated device that complies with current guidelines for office blood pressure measurement: design and pilot application study of the Microlife WatchBP Office device.

Authors:  George S Stergiou; Che-Wei Lin; Chia-Ming Lin; Shih-Lung Chang; Athanasios D Protogerou; Dimitris Tzamouranis; Efthimia Nasothimiou; Ty-Minh Tan
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.444

9.  Inter-arm blood pressure difference in hospitalized elderly patients--is it consistent?

Authors:  Alon Grossman; Avraham Weiss; Yichayaou Beloosesky; Nira Morag-Koren; Hefziba Green; Ehud Grossman
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  2013 ESH/ESC guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).

Authors:  Giuseppe Mancia; Robert Fagard; Krzysztof Narkiewicz; Josep Redon; Alberto Zanchetti; Michael Böhm; Thierry Christiaens; Renata Cifkova; Guy De Backer; Anna Dominiczak; Maurizio Galderisi; Diederick E Grobbee; Tiny Jaarsma; Paulus Kirchhof; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Stéphane Laurent; Athanasios J Manolis; Peter M Nilsson; Luis Miguel Ruilope; Roland E Schmieder; Per Anton Sirnes; Peter Sleight; Margus Viigimaa; Bernard Waeber; Faiez Zannad; Josep Redon; Anna Dominiczak; Krzysztof Narkiewicz; Peter M Nilsson; Michel Burnier; Margus Viigimaa; Ettore Ambrosioni; Mark Caufield; Antonio Coca; Michael Hecht Olsen; Roland E Schmieder; Costas Tsioufis; Philippe van de Borne; Jose Luis Zamorano; Stephan Achenbach; Helmut Baumgartner; Jeroen J Bax; Héctor Bueno; Veronica Dean; Christi Deaton; Cetin Erol; Robert Fagard; Roberto Ferrari; David Hasdai; Arno W Hoes; Paulus Kirchhof; Juhani Knuuti; Philippe Kolh; Patrizio Lancellotti; Ales Linhart; Petros Nihoyannopoulos; Massimo F Piepoli; Piotr Ponikowski; Per Anton Sirnes; Juan Luis Tamargo; Michal Tendera; Adam Torbicki; William Wijns; Stephan Windecker; Denis L Clement; Antonio Coca; Thierry C Gillebert; Michal Tendera; Enrico Agabiti Rosei; Ettore Ambrosioni; Stefan D Anker; Johann Bauersachs; Jana Brguljan Hitij; Mark Caulfield; Marc De Buyzere; Sabina De Geest; Geneviève Anne Derumeaux; Serap Erdine; Csaba Farsang; Christian Funck-Brentano; Vjekoslav Gerc; Giuseppe Germano; Stephan Gielen; Herman Haller; Arno W Hoes; Jens Jordan; Thomas Kahan; Michel Komajda; Dragan Lovic; Heiko Mahrholdt; Michael Hecht Olsen; Jan Ostergren; Gianfranco Parati; Joep Perk; Jorge Polonia; Bogdan A Popescu; Zeljko Reiner; Lars Rydén; Yuriy Sirenko; Alice Stanton; Harry Struijker-Boudier; Costas Tsioufis; Philippe van de Borne; Charalambos Vlachopoulos; Massimo Volpe; David A Wood
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 29.983

View more
  3 in total

1.  Systolic inter-arm blood pressure difference and risk of cognitive decline in older people: a cohort study.

Authors:  Christopher E Clark; Daniel Thomas; David J Llewellyn; Luigi Ferrucci; Stefania Bandinelli; John L Campbell
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference: non-persistence and association with incident cardiovascular disease in the Multi-ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Daniel A Duprez; David R Jacobs; Leah I B Andrews; Lyndia C Brumback; Julie O Denenberg; Robyn L Mcclelland; Isac C Thomas; Michael H Criqui; Matthew A Allison
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 2.877

3.  Prevalence of inter-arm blood pressure difference among young healthy adults: Results from a large cross-sectional study on 3235 participants.

Authors:  Rawand Abdulrahman Essa; Sirwan Khalid Ahmed
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-04-20
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.