Literature DB >> 18635232

Association of gadolinium based magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis.

Gautam Bhave1, Julia B Lewis, Sam S Chang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We investigated the recently discovered association between gadolinium based magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents and the development of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in patients with chronic kidney disease or acute kidney injury.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review of the PubMed database and publicly available patient databases was performed to characterize nephrogenic systemic fibrosis and its possible association with exposure to gadolinium based magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents.
RESULTS: Data from case series reports, nephrogenic systemic fibrosis patient databases, nephrogenic systemic fibrosis case reporting to the Food and Drug Administration after gadolinium contrast agent exposure and retrospective case control studies suggest a strong association between the use of gadolinium based magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents and the subsequent development of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in patients with renal disease. These data also suggest that the risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis depends on the degree of renal dysfunction, dose of contrast agent, gadolinium contrast agent stability and severity of concomitant illness. Thus, the occurrence of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis after gadolinium contrast agent exposure may vary from negligible up to 2% to 5% in select high risk clinical situations.
CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance imaging using gadolinium based contrast agents must be performed judiciously in patients with renal dysfunction, carefully weighing on a case by case basis the benefits of magnetic resonance imaging and the risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis as well as the disadvantages of undergoing alternative or foregoing imaging studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18635232      PMCID: PMC4128001          DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.05.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  37 in total

Review 1.  MR-angiography: the role of contrast agents.

Authors:  M Goyen; S G Ruehm; J F Debatin
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 2.  Renal imaging for diagnosis and staging of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Gary M Israel; Morton A Bosniak
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.241

3.  Nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy.

Authors:  S E Cowper; L D Su; J Bhawan; H S Robin; P E LeBoit
Journal:  Am J Dermatopathol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.533

4.  Case-control study of gadodiamide-related nephrogenic systemic fibrosis.

Authors:  Peter Marckmann; Lone Skov; Kristian Rossen; James Goya Heaf; Henrik S Thomsen
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 5.992

5.  Nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy with systemic involvement.

Authors:  William W Ting; Mary Seabury Stone; Kathi C Madison; Kevin Kurtz
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  2003-07

6.  Nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy: a novel cutaneous fibrosing disorder in patients with renal failure.

Authors:  Richard D Swartz; Leslie J Crofford; Sem H Phan; Robert W Ike; Lyndon D Su
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  A simple risk score for prediction of contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention: development and initial validation.

Authors:  Roxana Mehran; Eve D Aymong; Eugenia Nikolsky; Zoran Lasic; Ioannis Iakovou; Martin Fahy; Gary S Mintz; Alexandra J Lansky; Jeffrey W Moses; Gregg W Stone; Martin B Leon; George Dangas
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-10-06       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy with sodium bicarbonate: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Gregory J Merten; W Patrick Burgess; Lee V Gray; Jeremiah H Holleman; Timothy S Roush; Glen J Kowalchuk; Robert M Bersin; Arl Van Moore; Charles A Simonton; Robert A Rittase; H James Norton; Thomas P Kennedy
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-05-19       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy (scleromyxedema-like illness of renal disease).

Authors:  Julian M Mackay-Wiggan; David J Cohen; Mark A Hardy; Elizabeth H Knobler; Marc E Grossman
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 11.527

10.  Safety of gadolinium contrast agent in hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  S Okada; K Katagiri; T Kumazaki; H Yokoyama
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.701

View more
  23 in total

1.  The biodistribution of [153Gd]Gd-labeled magnetic resonance contrast agents in a transgenic mouse model of renal failure differs greatly from control mice.

Authors:  Thaddeus J Wadas; Christopher D Sherman; Jeffrey H Miner; James R Duncan; Carolyn J Anderson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 2.  [Physical interactions in MRI: Some rules of thumb for their reduction].

Authors:  M Mühlenweg; G Schaefers; S Trattnig
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Multifunctional mesoporous silica nanospheres with cleavable Gd(III) chelates as MRI contrast agents: synthesis, characterization, target-specificity, and renal clearance.

Authors:  Juan L Vivero-Escoto; Kathryn M L Taylor-Pashow; Rachel C Huxford; Joseph Della Rocca; Christie Okoruwa; Hongyu An; Weili Lin; Wenbin Lin
Journal:  Small       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 13.281

Review 4.  Basic MR relaxation mechanisms and contrast agent design.

Authors:  Luis M De León-Rodríguez; André F Martins; Marco C Pinho; Neil M Rofsky; A Dean Sherry
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Diagnostic accuracy of unenhanced, contrast-enhanced perfusion and angiographic MRI sequences for pulmonary embolism diagnosis: results of independent sequence readings.

Authors:  Marie Pierre Revel; Olivier Sanchez; Catherine Lefort; Guy Meyer; Sophie Couchon; Anne Hernigou; Ralph Niarra; Gilles Chatellier; Guy Frija
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography using time-spin labelling inversion pulse technique for detecting crossing renal vessels in children with symptomatic ureteropelvic junction obstruction: comparison with surgical findings.

Authors:  Nicolas Brucher; Julie Vial; Christiane Baunin; David Labarre; Olivier Meyrignac; Michel Juricic; Ourdia Bouali; Olivier Abbo; Philippe Galinier; Nicolas Sans
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Pharmacological stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Runyawan Chotenimitkhun; W Gregory Hundley
Journal:  Postgrad Med       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.840

8.  Noncontrast-enhanced magnetic resonance renal angiography using a repetitive artery and venous labelling technique at 3 T: comparison with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in subjects with normal renal function.

Authors:  Sung Yoon Park; Chan Kyo Kim; EunJu Kim; Byung Kwan Park
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-09-13       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Distribution of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) values in patients receiving contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Keigo Shimoji; Shigeki Aoki; Atsushi Nakanishi; Michimasa Suzuki; Masaaki Hori; Syuji Sato; Haruyoshi Hoshito; Shinsuke Kyogoku; Narisumi Cho; Yutaka Ozaki; Masaru Suzuki; Ryohei Kuwatsuru; Keisuke Sasai
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 2.374

10.  Biodegradable polysilsesquioxane nanoparticles as efficient contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Juan L Vivero-Escoto; William J Rieter; Honam Lau; Rachel C Huxford-Phillips; Wenbin Lin
Journal:  Small       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 13.281

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.