PURPOSE: We investigated the recently discovered association between gadolinium based magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents and the development of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in patients with chronic kidney disease or acute kidney injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review of the PubMed database and publicly available patient databases was performed to characterize nephrogenic systemic fibrosis and its possible association with exposure to gadolinium based magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents. RESULTS: Data from case series reports, nephrogenic systemic fibrosis patient databases, nephrogenic systemic fibrosis case reporting to the Food and Drug Administration after gadolinium contrast agent exposure and retrospective case control studies suggest a strong association between the use of gadolinium based magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents and the subsequent development of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in patients with renal disease. These data also suggest that the risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis depends on the degree of renal dysfunction, dose of contrast agent, gadolinium contrast agent stability and severity of concomitant illness. Thus, the occurrence of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis after gadolinium contrast agent exposure may vary from negligible up to 2% to 5% in select high risk clinical situations. CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance imaging using gadolinium based contrast agents must be performed judiciously in patients with renal dysfunction, carefully weighing on a case by case basis the benefits of magnetic resonance imaging and the risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis as well as the disadvantages of undergoing alternative or foregoing imaging studies.
PURPOSE: We investigated the recently discovered association between gadolinium based magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents and the development of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in patients with chronic kidney disease or acute kidney injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review of the PubMed database and publicly available patient databases was performed to characterize nephrogenic systemic fibrosis and its possible association with exposure to gadolinium based magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents. RESULTS: Data from case series reports, nephrogenic systemic fibrosispatient databases, nephrogenic systemic fibrosis case reporting to the Food and Drug Administration after gadolinium contrast agent exposure and retrospective case control studies suggest a strong association between the use of gadolinium based magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents and the subsequent development of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in patients with renal disease. These data also suggest that the risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis depends on the degree of renal dysfunction, dose of contrast agent, gadolinium contrast agent stability and severity of concomitant illness. Thus, the occurrence of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis after gadolinium contrast agent exposure may vary from negligible up to 2% to 5% in select high risk clinical situations. CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance imaging using gadolinium based contrast agents must be performed judiciously in patients with renal dysfunction, carefully weighing on a case by case basis the benefits of magnetic resonance imaging and the risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis as well as the disadvantages of undergoing alternative or foregoing imaging studies.
Authors: Peter Marckmann; Lone Skov; Kristian Rossen; James Goya Heaf; Henrik S Thomsen Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2007-05-04 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Roxana Mehran; Eve D Aymong; Eugenia Nikolsky; Zoran Lasic; Ioannis Iakovou; Martin Fahy; Gary S Mintz; Alexandra J Lansky; Jeffrey W Moses; Gregg W Stone; Martin B Leon; George Dangas Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2004-10-06 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Gregory J Merten; W Patrick Burgess; Lee V Gray; Jeremiah H Holleman; Timothy S Roush; Glen J Kowalchuk; Robert M Bersin; Arl Van Moore; Charles A Simonton; Robert A Rittase; H James Norton; Thomas P Kennedy Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-05-19 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Julian M Mackay-Wiggan; David J Cohen; Mark A Hardy; Elizabeth H Knobler; Marc E Grossman Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Thaddeus J Wadas; Christopher D Sherman; Jeffrey H Miner; James R Duncan; Carolyn J Anderson Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Juan L Vivero-Escoto; Kathryn M L Taylor-Pashow; Rachel C Huxford; Joseph Della Rocca; Christie Okoruwa; Hongyu An; Weili Lin; Wenbin Lin Journal: Small Date: 2011-11-09 Impact factor: 13.281
Authors: Luis M De León-Rodríguez; André F Martins; Marco C Pinho; Neil M Rofsky; A Dean Sherry Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2015-05-14 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Marie Pierre Revel; Olivier Sanchez; Catherine Lefort; Guy Meyer; Sophie Couchon; Anne Hernigou; Ralph Niarra; Gilles Chatellier; Guy Frija Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2013-05-08 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Nicolas Brucher; Julie Vial; Christiane Baunin; David Labarre; Olivier Meyrignac; Michel Juricic; Ourdia Bouali; Olivier Abbo; Philippe Galinier; Nicolas Sans Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-10-29 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Juan L Vivero-Escoto; William J Rieter; Honam Lau; Rachel C Huxford-Phillips; Wenbin Lin Journal: Small Date: 2013-04-24 Impact factor: 13.281