Literature DB >> 18634890

Visuospatial contextual processing in the parietal cortex: an fMRI investigation of the induced Roelofs effect.

Elizabeth Walter1, Paul Dassonville.   

Abstract

Neighboring contextual elements can dramatically affect the manner in which the brain processes the perceptual characteristics of an object. Indeed, many well-known visual illusions rely on misleading contextual cues to create misperceptions of size, length or orientation (e.g., in the Ebbinghaus, Muller-Lyer or rod-and-frame illusions, respectively). However, little is known about the brain regions underlying these integrative computations. The current study used fMRI to delineate the brain areas responsible for processing visuospatial contextual information. Participants were asked to determine whether a small target was positioned left or right of midline in the presence of an offset rectangle designed to induce a shift in the participant's perception of straight-ahead (the induced Roelofs effect). We found localized, bilateral regions in superior parietal cortex and precuneus that were specifically active when participants judged the target location in the presence of this shifted context; significantly less activation was present when a color judgment was made with identical stimuli, or when the location judgment was made without a Roelofs-inducing frame. We propose that this portion of parietal cortex is selectively involved in processing visuospatial contextual information. Additional findings support the notion that perceptual judgments of target location based on an egocentric frame of reference fall within the purview of the dorsal stream of visual processing, rather than the ventral stream.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18634890      PMCID: PMC2567834          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.06.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  32 in total

1.  Where is 'dorsal V4' in human visual cortex? Retinotopic, topographic and functional evidence.

Authors:  R B Tootell; N Hadjikhani
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  A new anatomical landmark for reliable identification of human area V5/MT: a quantitative analysis of sulcal patterning.

Authors:  S O Dumoulin; R G Bittar; N J Kabani; C L Baker; G Le Goualher; G Bruce Pike; A C Evans
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Two illusions of perceived orientation: one fools all of the people some of the time; the other fools all of the people all of the time.

Authors:  Richard T Dyde; A David Milner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-04-13       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The induced Roelofs effect: two visual systems or the shift of a single reference frame?

Authors:  Paul Dassonville; Bruce Bridgeman; Jagdeep Kaur Bala; Paul Thiem; Anthony Sampanes
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Objective analysis of the topological organization of the primate cortical visual system.

Authors:  M P Young
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-07-09       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Analysis of functional image analysis contest (FIAC) data with brainvoyager QX: From single-subject to cortically aligned group general linear model analysis and self-organizing group independent component analysis.

Authors:  Rainer Goebel; Fabrizio Esposito; Elia Formisano
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Role of gravity-based information on the orientation and localization of the perceived body midline.

Authors:  Hadrien Ceyte; Corinne Cian; Vincent Nougier; Isabelle Olivier; Marion Trousselard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-11-25       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The representation of perceived angular size in human primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Scott O Murray; Huseyin Boyaci; Daniel Kersten
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-02-05       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Area V5 of the human brain: evidence from a combined study using positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  J D Watson; R Myers; R S Frackowiak; J V Hajnal; R P Woods; J C Mazziotta; S Shipp; S Zeki
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  The neural mechanisms underlying the Müller-Lyer illusion and its interaction with visuospatial judgments.

Authors:  Ralph Weidner; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2006-05-17       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  14 in total

1.  Schizophrenia patients show augmented spatial frame illusion for visual and visuomotor tasks.

Authors:  Y Chen; R McBain; D Norton; D Ongur
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  Crossing the hands is more confusing for females than males.

Authors:  Michelle L Cadieux; Michael Barnett-Cowan; David I Shore
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Bayesian quantification of sensory reweighting in a familial bilateral vestibular disorder (DFNA9).

Authors:  Bart B G T Alberts; Luc P J Selen; Wim I M Verhagen; Ronald J E Pennings; W Pieter Medendorp
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Visual salience improves spatial working memory via enhanced parieto-temporal functional connectivity.

Authors:  Valerio Santangelo; Emiliano Macaluso
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Activation in a frontoparietal cortical network underlies individual differences in the performance of an embedded figures task.

Authors:  Elizabeth Walter; Paul Dassonville
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The Two-Wrongs model explains perception-action dissociations for illusions driven by distortions of the egocentric reference frame.

Authors:  Paul Dassonville; Scott A Reed
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Subclinical visuospatial impairment in Parkinson's disease: the role of Basal Ganglia and limbic system.

Authors:  Stefano Caproni; Marco Muti; Antonio Di Renzo; Massimo Principi; Nevia Caputo; Paolo Calabresi; Nicola Tambasco
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Effects of Spaceflight Stressors on Brain Volume, Microstructure, and Intracranial Fluid Distribution.

Authors:  Jessica K Lee; Vincent Koppelmans; Ofer Pasternak; Nichole E Beltran; Igor S Kofman; Yiri E De Dios; Edwin R Mulder; Ajitkumar P Mulavara; Jacob J Bloomberg; Rachael D Seidler
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2021-03-30

9.  Spatial task context makes short-latency reaches prone to induced Roelofs illusion.

Authors:  Bahareh Taghizadeh; Alexander Gail
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Adaptation to size affects saccades with long but not short latencies.

Authors:  Eckart Zimmermann; Maria Concetta Morrone; David Burr
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.