Literature DB >> 16707733

The neural mechanisms underlying the Müller-Lyer illusion and its interaction with visuospatial judgments.

Ralph Weidner1, Gereon R Fink.   

Abstract

Arrows terminating a line can distort the perceived line length. This so-called Müller-Lyer illusion can be used in healthy human subjects to mimic the performance of neglect patients in visuospatial judgments (e.g., in the landmark task). In this study, we investigated the neural mechanisms underlying the Müller-Lyer illusion, the landmark task, and their interaction. This was achieved by parametrically manipulating the magnitude of the Müller-Lyer illusion both in a landmark and in a luminance (control) task. As expected, the landmark task activated right posterior parietal cortex and right temporo-occipital cortex. In contrast, the neural processes associated with the strength of the Müller-Lyer illusion were located bilaterally in the lateral occipital cortex as well as the right superior parietal cortex. The data not only converge with but also extend neuropsychological data that indicate maintained line-length illusion in neglect patients. In addition, our results support the size-constancy scaling hypothesis as a putative mechanism underlying line-length illusions. Furthermore, activation that was driven by both the task and the strength of the Müller-Lyer illusion was observed in right intraparietal sulcus, thus arguing in favor of an interaction of illusory information with the top-down processes underlying visuospatial judgments in right parietal cortex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16707733     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhk042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  24 in total

1.  Comparison of length judgments and the Müller-Lyer illusion in monkeys and humans.

Authors:  Oana Tudusciuc; Andreas Nieder
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-10-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Left of centre: asymmetries for the horizontal vertical line illusion.

Authors:  Elisha K Josev; Jason D Forte; Michael E R Nicholls
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-11-25

Review 3.  Cortical mechanisms for trans-saccadic memory and integration of multiple object features.

Authors:  Steven L Prime; Michael Vesia; J Douglas Crawford
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Evidence of top-down modulation of the Brentano illusion but not of the glare effect by transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Ottavia Maddaluno; Alessio Facchin; Daniele Zavagno; Nadia Bolognini; Elisa Gianoli; Elisa M Curreri; Roberta Daini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Distinct Contributions of Genes and Environment to Visual Size Illusion and the Underlying Neural Mechanism.

Authors:  Lihong Chen; Qian Xu; Li Shen; Tian Yuan; Ying Wang; Wen Zhou; Yi Jiang
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  State-trace analysis of the effects of a visual illusion on saccade amplitudes and perceptual judgments.

Authors:  Jason S McCarley; Christopher Grant
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-10

7.  Global processing during the Müller-Lyer illusion is distinctively affected by the degree of autistic traits in the typical population.

Authors:  Philippe A Chouinard; William A Noulty; Irene Sperandio; Oriane Landry
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Visuospatial contextual processing in the parietal cortex: an fMRI investigation of the induced Roelofs effect.

Authors:  Elizabeth Walter; Paul Dassonville
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Preserved Haptic Shape Processing after Bilateral LOC Lesions.

Authors:  Jacqueline C Snow; Melvyn A Goodale; Jody C Culham
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  The Müller-Lyer Illusion in a computational model of biological object recognition.

Authors:  Astrid Zeman; Oliver Obst; Kevin R Brooks; Anina N Rich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.