Literature DB >> 18634759

Specific or general? The nature of attention set changes triggered by distracting auditory events.

János Horváth1, Urte Roeber, Alexandra Bendixen, Erich Schröger.   

Abstract

Distraction is a disruption of a selective attention set triggered by infrequent, unpredictable events. In the present study, two hypotheses on the nature of this attention change were contrasted in the auditory domain: (1) distraction is a specific attention-switch: attention is diverted from the task-relevant to the distracting information or (2) distraction is a general attention resetting, that is, a transition to a general attention set in which the organism is more capable of facing any event. The general attention resetting hypothesis predicts that any infrequent, unpredictable stimulus would trigger distraction, whereas the specific attention-switch hypothesis predicts that such a stimulus triggers distraction only if it deviates in a task-irrelevant stimulus aspect. To test this, a sequence of tone-pairs was presented. The participants' task was to respond according to the direction of within-pair pitch-change. Deviant trials were presented occasionally (10%). In the Relevant Deviance condition, the deviation concerned the task-relevant stimulus aspect (larger within-pair pitch-difference); in the Irrelevant Deviance condition the deviance occurred in a task-irrelevant stimulus aspect (spectral width of the second tone of the pair). In the Double Deviance condition, deviants featured both a larger pitch-difference and a spectral width difference. The elicitation pattern of the N2b/MMN, P3a and late negative components favors the specific attention-switch hypothesis, that is, distraction comprises an involuntary attention shift from the task-relevant information to the distracting one. The presence of deviance-related response time delay in the Relevant Deviance condition suggests that other effects unrelated to distraction also occurred.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18634759     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.06.096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  6 in total

Review 1.  The cognitive determinants of behavioral distraction by deviant auditory stimuli: a review.

Authors:  Fabrice B R Parmentier
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-12-21

2.  Sensory ERP effects in auditory distraction: did we miss the main event?

Authors:  János Horváth
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-08-04

3.  Perception of a Japanese vowel length contrast by Japanese and American English listeners: behavioral and electrophysiological measures.

Authors:  Miwako Hisagi; Valerie L Shafer; Winifred Strange; Elyse S Sussman
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-09-26       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Distraction by deviant sounds during reading: An eye-movement study.

Authors:  Martin R Vasilev; Fabrice Br Parmentier; Bernhard Angele; Julie A Kirkby
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2019-01-13       Impact factor: 2.143

5.  Auditory Predictions and Prediction Errors in Response to Self-Initiated Vowels.

Authors:  Franziska Knolle; Michael Schwartze; Erich Schröger; Sonja A Kotz
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Intention-based and sensory-based predictions.

Authors:  Álvaro Darriba; Yi-Fang Hsu; Sandrien Van Ommen; Florian Waszak
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.