Literature DB >> 18634708

Cut-off points for anthropometric indices of adiposity: differential classification in a large population of young women.

Sarah L Duggleby1, Alan A Jackson, Keith M Godfrey, Siân M Robinson, Hazel M Inskip.   

Abstract

Anthropometric indices of adiposity include BMI, waist circumference and waist:height ratio. In the recruitment phase of a prospective cohort study carried out between 1998 and 2002 we studied a population sample of 11 786 white Caucasian non-pregnant women in Southampton, UK aged 20-34 years, and explored the extent to which proposed cut-off points for the three indices identified the same or different women and how these indices related to adiposity. Height, weight and waist circumference were measured and fat mass was estimated from skinfold thicknesses; fat mass index was calculated as fat mass/height1.65. Of the subjects, 4869 (42 %) women were overweight (BMI > or = 25 kg/m2) and 1849 (16 %) were obese (BMI > or = 30 kg/m2). A total of 890 (8 %) subjects were not overweight but had a waist circumference > or = 80 cm and 748 (6 %) subjects were overweight but had a waist circumference < 80 cm (6 %). Of the women, 50 % had a BMI > or = 25 kg/m2 or a waist circumference > or = 80 cm or a waist:height ratio > or = 0.5. Of the variation in fat mass index, 85 % was explained by BMI, 76 % by waist circumference and 75 % by waist:height ratio. Our findings demonstrate that many women are differentially classified depending on which index of adiposity is used. As each index captures different aspects of size in terms of adiposity, there is the need to determine how the three indices relate to function and how they can be of use in defining risk of ill health in women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18634708      PMCID: PMC4579544          DOI: 10.1017/S0007114508012245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Nutr        ISSN: 0007-1145            Impact factor:   3.718


  34 in total

1.  Height-normalized indices of the body's fat-free mass and fat mass: potentially useful indicators of nutritional status.

Authors:  T B VanItallie; M U Yang; S B Heymsfield; R C Funk; R A Boileau
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 7.045

2.  Maternal body mass index and the risk of preeclampsia: a systematic overview.

Authors:  Tara E O'Brien; Joel G Ray; Wee-Shian Chan
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.822

Review 3.  The short- and long-term implications of maternal obesity on the mother and her offspring.

Authors:  P M Catalano; H M Ehrenberg
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 6.531

4.  Controlling the obesity epidemic is important for maintaining musculoskeletal health.

Authors:  A D Woolf; F Breedveld; T K Kvien
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Obesity and the risk of myocardial infarction in 27,000 participants from 52 countries: a case-control study.

Authors:  Salim Yusuf; Steven Hawken; Stephanie Ounpuu; Leonelo Bautista; Maria Grazia Franzosi; Patrick Commerford; Chim C Lang; Zvonko Rumboldt; Churchill L Onen; Liu Lisheng; Supachai Tanomsup; Paul Wangai; Fahad Razak; Arya M Sharma; Sonia S Anand
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005-11-05       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Circulating oxidized LDL is associated with increased waist circumference independent of body mass index in men and women.

Authors:  Tanja Weinbrenner; Helmut Schröder; Veronica Escurriol; Montserrat Fito; Roberto Elosua; Joan Vila; Jaume Marrugat; Maria-Isabel Covas
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 7.045

7.  Six reasons why the waist-to-height ratio is a rapid and effective global indicator for health risks of obesity and how its use could simplify the international public health message on obesity.

Authors:  Margaret Ashwell; Shiun Dong Hsieh
Journal:  Int J Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.833

8.  Body mass index has risen more steeply in tall than in short 3-year olds: serial cross-sectional surveys 1988-2003.

Authors:  I E Buchan; P E Bundred; D J Kitchiner; T J Cole
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 5.095

9.  BMI compared with 3-dimensional body shape: the UK National Sizing Survey.

Authors:  Jonathan C K Wells; Philip Treleaven; Tim J Cole
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.045

10.  Central overweight and obesity in British youth aged 11-16 years: cross sectional surveys of waist circumference.

Authors:  H David McCarthy; Sandra M Ellis; Tim J Cole
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-03-22
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  The use of Broca index to assess cut- off points for overweight in adults: A short review.

Authors:  Irakoze Laurent; Manirakiza Astère; Banderembako Paul; Nkengurutse Liliane; Yue Li; Qingfeng Cheng; Qifu Li; Xiaoqiu Xiao
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 6.514

2.  Logical Differential Prediction Bayes Net, improving breast cancer diagnosis for older women.

Authors:  Houssam Nassif; Yirong Wu; David Page; Elizabeth Burnside
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2012-11-03

3.  Epigenetic gene promoter methylation at birth is associated with child's later adiposity.

Authors:  Keith M Godfrey; Allan Sheppard; Peter D Gluckman; Karen A Lillycrop; Graham C Burdge; Cameron McLean; Joanne Rodford; Joanne L Slater-Jefferies; Emma Garratt; Sarah R Crozier; B Starling Emerald; Catharine R Gale; Hazel M Inskip; Cyrus Cooper; Mark A Hanson
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 9.461

Review 4.  Predicting cardiometabolic risk: waist-to-height ratio or BMI. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Savvas C Savva; Demetris Lamnisos; Anthony G Kafatos
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 3.168

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.