P Szulc1, P D Delmas. 1. INSERM Research Unit 831, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France. pawel.szulc@inserm.fr
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The aim was to analyse data on the use of biochemical bone turnover markers (BTM) in postmenopausal osteoporosis. METHODS: We carried out a comparative analysis of the most important papers concerning BTM in postmenopausal osteoporosis that have been published recently. RESULTS: The BTM levels are influenced by several factors. They are moderately correlated with BMD and subsequent bone loss. Increased levels of bone resorption markers are associated with a higher risk of fracture. Changes in the BTM during the anti-osteoporotic treatment (including combination therapy) reflect the mechanisms of action of the drugs and help to establish their effective doses. Changes in the BTM during the anti-resorptive treatment are correlated with their anti-fracture efficacy. CONCLUSION: Biological samples should be obtained in a standardised way. BTM cannot be used for prediction of the accelerated bone loss at the level of the individual. BTM help to detect postmenopausal women who are at high risk of fracture; however, adequate practical guidelines are lacking. BTM measurements taken during the anti-resorptive therapy help to identify non-compliers. They may improve adherence to the anti-resorptive therapy and the fall in the BTM levels that exceeds the predefined threshold improves patients' persistence with the treatment. There are no guidelines concerning the use of BTM in monitoring anti-osteoporotic therapy in postmenopausal women.
INTRODUCTION: The aim was to analyse data on the use of biochemical bone turnover markers (BTM) in postmenopausal osteoporosis. METHODS: We carried out a comparative analysis of the most important papers concerning BTM in postmenopausal osteoporosis that have been published recently. RESULTS: The BTM levels are influenced by several factors. They are moderately correlated with BMD and subsequent bone loss. Increased levels of bone resorption markers are associated with a higher risk of fracture. Changes in the BTM during the anti-osteoporotic treatment (including combination therapy) reflect the mechanisms of action of the drugs and help to establish their effective doses. Changes in the BTM during the anti-resorptive treatment are correlated with their anti-fracture efficacy. CONCLUSION: Biological samples should be obtained in a standardised way. BTM cannot be used for prediction of the accelerated bone loss at the level of the individual. BTM help to detect postmenopausal women who are at high risk of fracture; however, adequate practical guidelines are lacking. BTM measurements taken during the anti-resorptive therapy help to identify non-compliers. They may improve adherence to the anti-resorptive therapy and the fall in the BTM levels that exceeds the predefined threshold improves patients' persistence with the treatment. There are no guidelines concerning the use of BTM in monitoring anti-osteoporotic therapy in postmenopausal women.
Authors: D C Bauer; P M Sklarin; K L Stone; D M Black; M C Nevitt; K E Ensrud; C D Arnaud; H K Genant; P Garnero; P D Delmas; H Lawaetz; S R Cummings Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 1999-08 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: S Gonnelli; A Cadirni; C Caffarelli; R Petrioli; A Montagnani; M B Franci; B Lucani; G Francini; R Nuti Journal: Bone Date: 2006-08-14 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: Michael G Alexandrakis; Freda H Passam; Niki Malliaraki; Constantinos Katachanakis; Despina S Kyriakou; Andrew N Margioris Journal: Clin Chim Acta Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 3.786
Authors: Lars Rejnmark; Niels Henrik Buus; Peter Vestergaard; Lene Heickendorff; Frederik Andreasen; Mogens Lytken Larsen; Leif Mosekilde Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2004-02-16 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: S M Park; J Y Joung; Y Y Cho; S Y Sohn; K Y Hur; J H Kim; S W Kim; J H Chung; M K Lee; Y-K Min Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Date: 2015-02-04 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: S G Mehta; M Khare; R Ramani; G D J Watts; M Simon; K E Osann; S Donkervoort; E Dec; A Nalbandian; J Platt; M Pasquali; A Wang; T Mozaffar; C D Smith; V E Kimonis Journal: Clin Genet Date: 2012-10-04 Impact factor: 4.438
Authors: F Waldron-Lynch; B F Murray; J J Brady; M J McKenna; A McGoldrick; G Warrington; G O'Loughlin; J M Barragry Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2009-03-07 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: J Tamaki; M Iki; E Kadowaki; Y Sato; Y Chiba; T Akiba; T Matsumoto; H Nishino; S Kagamimori; Y Kagawa; H Yoneshima Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2012-08-11 Impact factor: 4.507