Literature DB >> 19184267

Combining bone resorption markers and heel quantitative ultrasound to discriminate between fracture cases and controls.

D Nanchen1, J Cornuz, C Ruffieux, W Riesen, P Burckhardt, M A Krieg.   

Abstract

SUMMARY: This nested case-control analysis of a Swiss ambulatory cohort of elderly women assessed the discriminatory power of urinary markers of bone resorption and heel quantitative ultrasound for non-vertebral fractures. The tests all discriminated between cases and controls, but combining the two strategies yielded no additional relevant information.
INTRODUCTION: Data are limited regarding the combination of bone resorption markers and heel quantitative bone ultrasound (QUS) in the detection of women at risk for fracture.
METHODS: In a nested case-control analysis, we studied 368 women (mean age 76.2 +/- 3.2 years), 195 with low-trauma non-vertebral fractures and 173 without, matched for age, BMI, medical center, and follow-up duration, from a prospective study designed to predict fractures. Urinary total pyridinolines (PYD) and deoxypyridinolines (DPD) were measured by high performance liquid chromatography. All women underwent bone evaluations using Achilles+ and Sahara heel QUS.
RESULTS: Areas under the receiver operating-characteristic curve (AUC) for discriminative models of the fracture group, with 95% confidence intervals, were 0.62 (0.56-0.68) and 0.59 (0.53-0.65) for PYD and DPD, and 0.64 (0.58-0.69) and 0.65 (0.59-0.71) for Achilles+ and Sahara QUS, respectively. The combination of resorption markers and QUS added no significant discriminatory information to either measurement alone with an AUC of 0.66 (0.60-0.71) for Achilles+ with PYD and 0.68 (0.62-0.73) for Sahara with PYD.
CONCLUSIONS: Urinary bone resorption markers and QUS are equally discriminatory between non-vertebral fracture patients and controls. However, the combination of bone resorption markers and QUS is not better than either test used alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19184267     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-009-0843-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  39 in total

Review 1.  Molecular markers of bone turnover: biochemical, technical and analytical aspects.

Authors:  M J Seibel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Effects of age, menopause and osteoporosis on free, peptide-bound and total pyridinium crosslink excretion.

Authors:  M T Del Campo; M L González-Casaus; P Aguado; M Bernad; F Carrera; M E Martínez
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Prediction of hip fracture risk by quantitative ultrasound in more than 7000 Swiss women > or =70 years of age: comparison of three technologically different bone ultrasound devices in the SEMOF study.

Authors:  Marc-Antoine Krieg; Jacques Cornuz; Christiane Ruffieux; Guy Van Melle; Daniel Büche; Maximilian A Dambacher; Didier Hans; Florian Hartl; Hansjorg J Häuselmann; Marius Kraenzlin; Kurt Lippuner; Maurus Neff; Pierro Pancaldi; Rene Rizzoli; Franco Tanzi; Robert Theiler; Alan Tyndall; Claus Wimpfheimer; Peter Burckhardt
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 4.  Contribution of bone mineral density and bone turnover markers to the estimation of risk of osteoporotic fracture in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  P Garnero; P D Delmas
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.041

5.  Ultrasound measurements for the prediction of osteoporotic fractures in elderly people.

Authors:  S M Pluijm; W C Graafmans; L M Bouter; P Lips
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  FRAX and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK.

Authors:  J A Kanis; O Johnell; A Oden; H Johansson; E McCloskey
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Factors affecting the assay of urinary 3-hydroxy pyridinium crosslinks of collagen as markers of bone resorption.

Authors:  A Colwell; R G Russell; R Eastell
Journal:  Eur J Clin Invest       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.686

8.  Direct, enzyme-linked immunoassay for urinary deoxypyridinoline as a specific marker for measuring bone resorption.

Authors:  S P Robins; H Woitge; R Hesley; J Ju; S Seyedin; M J Seibel
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Assessment of biochemical markers of bone metabolism in relation to the occurrence of fracture: a retrospective and prospective population-based study of women.

Authors:  K Akesson; S Ljunghall; B Jonsson; I Sernbo; O Johnell; P Gärdsell; K J Obrant
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Relative contributions of bone density, bone turnover, and clinical risk factors to long-term fracture prediction.

Authors:  L Joseph Melton; Cynthia S Crowson; W Michael O'Fallon; Heinz W Wahner; B Lawrence Riggs
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 6.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.