Literature DB >> 10579704

The effectiveness of the use of patient-based measures of health in routine practice in improving the process and outcomes of patient care: a literature review.

J Greenhalgh1, K Meadows.   

Abstract

Despite a number of potential benefits to both the clinician and the patient, patient-based measures of health have not been routinely or systematically used within routine practice by clinicians in the care of individual patients. There are a number of practical, methodological and attitudinal barriers which have so far limited the use of patient-based measures of health within routine practice. The extent to which these barriers are overcome is likely to influence the effectiveness of such instruments in improving the process and outcomes of patient care. This study reviewed the evidence for the effectiveness of this intervention and identified some of the factors that may influence its effectiveness. Thirteen relevant studies were located using search strategies on three computerized databases for 1987-97. The study found that clinicians see information from patient-based measures of health as valuable in the overall assessment of the patient and that its feedback to clinicians increases the detection of psychological and, to a lesser extent, functional problems. However, there was little evidence to suggest their use substantially changed patient management or improved patient outcomes. Our findings suggest that the ways in which patient based measures of health are implemented in routine practice may have an impact on their effectiveness. It is recommended that implementation strategies that are guided by theories of individual and organizational change might allow the barriers to using patient-based measures of health in routine practice to be identified and overcome more effectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10579704     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.1999.00209.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract        ISSN: 1356-1294            Impact factor:   2.431


  104 in total

1.  Identifying changes in scores on the EORTC-QLQ-C30 representing a change in patients' supportive care needs.

Authors:  Claire F Snyder; Amanda L Blackford; Jonathan Sussman; Daryl Bainbridge; Doris Howell; Hsien Y Seow; Michael A Carducci; Albert W Wu
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  The PROMIS initiative: involvement of rehabilitation stakeholders in development and examples of applications in rehabilitation research.

Authors:  Dagmar Amtmann; Karon F Cook; Kurt L Johnson; David Cella
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.966

3.  The impact of the VF-14 index, a perceived visual function measure, in the routine management of cataract patients.

Authors:  J M Valderas; M Rue; G Guyatt; J Alonso
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Validation of the EQ-5D quality of life instrument in patients after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  David Nowels; Joe McGloin; John M Westfall; Sherry Holcomb
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 5.  The clinical significance of quality of life assessments in oncology: a summary for clinicians.

Authors:  Jeff A Sloan; Marlene H Frost; Rick Berzon; Amylou Dueck; Gordon Guyatt; Carol Moinpour; Mirjam Sprangers; Carol Ferrans; David Cella
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2006-06-23       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Logistics of collecting patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical practice: an overview and practical examples.

Authors:  Matthias Rose; Andrea Bezjak
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Taking PROs and patient-centered care seriously: incremental and disruptive ideas for incorporating PROs in oncology practice.

Authors:  Molla Sloane Donaldson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-11-09       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Overcoming barriers to implementing patient-reported outcomes in an electronic health record: a case report.

Authors:  Christopher A Harle; Alyson Listhaus; Constanza M Covarrubias; Siegfried Of Schmidt; Sean Mackey; Peter J Carek; Roger B Fillingim; Robert W Hurley
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  A randomized trial of weekly symptom telemonitoring in advanced lung cancer.

Authors:  Susan E Yount; Nan Rothrock; Michael Bass; Jennifer L Beaumont; Deborah Pach; Thomas Lad; Jyoti Patel; Maria Corona; Rebecca Weiland; Katherine Del Ciello; David Cella
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 3.612

10.  Using the EORTC-QLQ-C30 in clinical practice for patient management: identifying scores requiring a clinician's attention.

Authors:  Claire F Snyder; Amanda L Blackford; Toru Okuyama; Tatsuo Akechi; Hiroko Yamashita; Tatsuya Toyama; Michael A Carducci; Albert W Wu
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.