Literature DB >> 24357884

Practical Marginalized Multilevel Models.

Michael E Griswold1, Bruce J Swihart1, Brian S Caffo1, Scott L Zeger1.   

Abstract

Clustered data analysis is characterized by the need to describe both systematic variation in a mean model and cluster-dependent random variation in an association model. Marginalized multilevel models embrace the robustness and interpretations of a marginal mean model, while retaining the likelihood inference capabilities and flexible dependence structures of a conditional association model. Although there has been increasing recognition of the attractiveness of marginalized multilevel models, there has been a gap in their practical application arising from a lack of readily available estimation procedures. We extend the marginalized multilevel model to allow for nonlinear functions in both the mean and association aspects. We then formulate marginal models through conditional specifications to facilitate estimation with mixed model computational solutions already in place. We illustrate the MMM and approximate MMM approaches on a cerebrovascular deficiency crossover trial using SAS and an epidemiological study on race and visual impairment using R. Datasets, SAS and R code are included as supplemental materials.

Entities:  

Keywords:  generalized linear mixed model; latent variable; likelihood inference; marginal model; nonlinear mixed model; random effects

Year:  2013        PMID: 24357884      PMCID: PMC3865434          DOI: 10.1002/sta4.22

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat        ISSN: 0038-9986


  11 in total

1.  Marginally specified logistic-normal models for longitudinal binary data.

Authors:  P J Heagerty
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Likelihood methods for measuring statistical evidence.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Blume
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-09-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Nonlinear mixed effects models for repeated measures data.

Authors:  M L Lindstrom; D M Bates
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Marginalized binary mixed-effects models with covariate-dependent random effects and likelihood inference.

Authors:  Zengri Wang; Thomas A Louis
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Flexible Random Intercept Models for Binary Outcomes Using Mixtures of Normals.

Authors:  Brian Caffo; Ming-Wen An; Charles Rohde
Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal       Date:  2007-07-15       Impact factor: 1.681

6.  To GEE or not to GEE: comparing population average and mixed models for estimating the associations between neighborhood risk factors and health.

Authors:  Alan E Hubbard; Jennifer Ahern; Nancy L Fleischer; Mark Van der Laan; Sheri A Lippman; Nicholas Jewell; Tim Bruckner; William A Satariano
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.822

7.  Explanatory Item Response Models: A Generalized Linear and Nonlinear Approach by P. de Boeck and M. Wilson and Generalized Latent Variable Modeling: Multilevel, Longitudinal and Structural Equation Models by A. Skrondal and S. Rabe-Hesketh.

Authors:  Jay Verkuilen
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.500

8.  Models for longitudinal data: a generalized estimating equation approach.

Authors:  S L Zeger; K Y Liang; P S Albert
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Random-effects models for serial observations with binary response.

Authors:  R Stiratelli; N Laird; J H Ware
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Socioeconomic status and visual impairment among urban Americans. Baltimore Eye Survey Research Group.

Authors:  J M Tielsch; A Sommer; J Katz; H Quigley; S Ezrine
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1991-05
View more
  3 in total

1.  A note on marginalization of regression parameters from mixed models of binary outcomes.

Authors:  Donald Hedeker; Stephen H C du Toit; Hakan Demirtas; Robert D Gibbons
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Body representation among adults with phantom limb pain: Results from a foot identification task.

Authors:  Emma H Beisheim-Ryan; Ryan T Pohlig; Jared Medina; Gregory E Hicks; Jaclyn M Sions
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2021-09-17       Impact factor: 3.931

3.  Estimating overall exposure effects for the clustered and censored outcome using random effect Tobit regression models.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Michael E Griswold
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-07-24       Impact factor: 2.373

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.