BACKGROUND:Menopausal hormone therapy increases mammographic density. We determined whether increases in serum estrone sulfate (E(1)S) levels during menopausal hormone therapy predict increased mammographic density. METHODS: We measured percent mammographic density and serum E(1)S levels in 428 participants of the Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions study who were randomly assigned todaily conjugated equine estrogen (CEE) 0.625 mg alone, CEE + daily medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) 2.5 mg, CEE + cyclical MPA (10 mg days 1-12 per 28-day cycle), or CEE + cyclical micronized progesterone (10 mg days 1-12). Serum E(1)S levels were determined by RIA. Information about covariates was determined by annual questionnaire. Using linear regression, we determined the association between change in E(1)S level from baseline to 12 months and change in percent mammographic density (by semiquantitative interactive threshold method). RESULTS: After controlling for baseline mammographic density, age, body mass index, alcohol intake, parity, smoking, ethnicity, physical activity, and age at first pregnancy, mammographic density increased by 1.3% for every 1 ng/mL increase in E(1)S level (P < 0.0001). The association between change in E(1)S level and change in mammographic density differed by treatment group (greater effect in CEE + cyclical MPA group versus CEE group; P = 0.05). After controlling for treatment group, change in the ratio of E(1)S to E(1) was also positively associated with change in mammographic density. CONCLUSIONS: Increases in serum E(1)S levels during menopausal hormone therapy are associated with increases in mammographic density. The relative contribution of E(1)S and E(1) to stimulation of breast tissue awaits further elucidation.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Menopausal hormone therapy increases mammographic density. We determined whether increases in serum estrone sulfate (E(1)S) levels during menopausal hormone therapy predict increased mammographic density. METHODS: We measured percent mammographic density and serum E(1)S levels in 428 participants of the Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions study who were randomly assigned to daily conjugated equine estrogen (CEE) 0.625 mg alone, CEE + daily medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) 2.5 mg, CEE + cyclical MPA (10 mg days 1-12 per 28-day cycle), or CEE + cyclical micronized progesterone (10 mg days 1-12). Serum E(1)S levels were determined by RIA. Information about covariates was determined by annual questionnaire. Using linear regression, we determined the association between change in E(1)S level from baseline to 12 months and change in percent mammographic density (by semiquantitative interactive threshold method). RESULTS: After controlling for baseline mammographic density, age, body mass index, alcohol intake, parity, smoking, ethnicity, physical activity, and age at first pregnancy, mammographic density increased by 1.3% for every 1 ng/mL increase in E(1)S level (P < 0.0001). The association between change in E(1)S level and change in mammographic density differed by treatment group (greater effect in CEE + cyclical MPA group versus CEE group; P = 0.05). After controlling for treatment group, change in the ratio of E(1)S to E(1) was also positively associated with change in mammographic density. CONCLUSIONS: Increases in serum E(1)S levels during menopausal hormone therapy are associated with increases in mammographic density. The relative contribution of E(1)S and E(1) to stimulation of breast tissue awaits further elucidation.
Authors: N F Boyd; J W Byng; R A Jong; E K Fishell; L E Little; A B Miller; G A Lockwood; D L Tritchler; M J Yaffe Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1995-05-03 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: R M Harris; D M Wood; L Bottomley; S Blagg; K Owen; P J Hughes; R H Waring; C J Kirk Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Alison M Dunning; Mitch Dowsett; Catherine S Healey; Louise Tee; Robert N Luben; Elizabeth Folkerd; Karen L Novik; Livia Kelemen; Saeko Ogata; Paul D P Pharoah; Douglas F Easton; N E Day; Bruce A J Ponder Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2004-06-16 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Eunjung Lee; Sue A Ingles; David Van Den Berg; Wei Wang; Chris Lavallee; Mei-Hua Huang; Carolyn J Crandall; Frank Z Stanczyk; Gail A Greendale; Giske Ursin Journal: Menopause Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Carolyn J Crandall; Aaron K Aragaki; Rowan T Chlebowski; Anne McTiernan; Garnet Anderson; Susan L Hendrix; Barbara B Cochrane; Lewis H Kuller; Jane A Cauley Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2009-10-12
Authors: Marike Gabrielson; Shadi Azam; Elina Hardell; Madeleine Holm; Kumari A Ubhayasekera; Mikael Eriksson; Magnus Bäcklund; Jonas Bergquist; Kamila Czene; Per Hall Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2020-08-26 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Eunjung Lee; Jianning Luo; Yu-Chen Su; Juan Pablo Lewinger; Fredrick R Schumacher; David Van Den Berg; Anna H Wu; Leslie Bernstein; Giske Ursin Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2014-12-11 Impact factor: 8.408