Literature DB >> 18628281

The role of audiologic evaluation in progressive audiologic tinnitus management.

James A Henry1, Tara L Zaugg, Paula J Myers, Martin A Schechter.   

Abstract

Progressive Audiologic Tinnitus Management (PATM) is based on the premise that tinnitus is managed most efficiently using a hierarchy of clinical services that address different levels of need. PATM includes five levels of management: (a) triage; (b) audiologic evaluation; (c) group education; (d) tinnitus evaluation; and (e) individualized management. This article provides an overview of PATM and focuses on the procedures that make up the Level 2 Audiologic Evaluation. The evaluation is conducted to assess the potential need for medical, audiologic (hearing loss, tinnitus, hyperacusis), and/or mental health services. The Tinnitus Handicap Inventory, Hearing Handicap Inventory, and Tinnitus and Hearing Survey are used to differentiate effects of tinnitus and hearing loss. If indicated, patients are interviewed with the Tinnitus-Impact Screening Interview. Patients requiring amplification receive hearing aids. Often, management of hearing loss at Level 2 addresses any problems that were attributed to the tinnitus, which obviates further tinnitus-specific intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18628281      PMCID: PMC4134888          DOI: 10.1177/1084713808319941

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Amplif        ISSN: 1084-7138


  32 in total

1.  Predictors of tinnitus discomfort, adaptation and subjective loudness.

Authors:  B Scott; P Lindberg; L Melin; L Lyttkens
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1990-02

2.  Clinical guide for audiologic tinnitus management II: Treatment.

Authors:  James A Henry; Tara L Zaugg; Martin A Schechter
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.493

Review 3.  Headache and sleep disorders: review and clinical implications for headache management.

Authors:  Jeanetta C Rains; J Steven Poceta
Journal:  Headache       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.887

4.  Comparison of pulsed and continuous tone thresholds in patients with tinnitus.

Authors:  I Hochberg; S Waltzman
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1972 Sep-Dec

5.  The diagnostic value of tinnitus pitch.

Authors:  E Douek; J Reid
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 1.469

6.  The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure.

Authors:  K Kroenke; R L Spitzer; J B Williams
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.

Authors:  A Bandura
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  A factor analytical study of tinnitus complaint behaviour.

Authors:  S C Jakes; R S Hallam; C Chambers; R Hinchcliffe
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1985

9.  Pulsed versus continuous tones for evaluating the loudness of tinnitus.

Authors:  J A Henry; M B Meikle
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 1.664

10.  A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth sleepiness scale.

Authors:  M W Johns
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 5.849

View more
  18 in total

1.  Individual patient factors associated with effective tinnitus treatment.

Authors:  Sarah M Theodoroff; Andrew Schuette; Susan Griest; James A Henry
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 2.  The Application of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health to Functional Auditory Consequences of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  R Vander Werff Kathy
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2016-08

3.  Pilot study to evaluate ecological momentary assessment of tinnitus.

Authors:  James A Henry; Gino Galvez; Mitchel B Turbin; Emily J Thielman; Garnett P McMillan; Joseph A Istvan
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  MRI and MR angiography evaluation of pulsatile tinnitus: A focused, physiology-based protocol.

Authors:  Daniel D Cummins; Michael T Caton; Vinil Shah; Karl Meisel; Christine Glastonbury; Matthew R Amans
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 2.486

5.  Using therapeutic sound with progressive audiologic tinnitus management.

Authors:  James A Henry; Tara L Zaugg; Paula J Myers; Martin A Schechter
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-07-29

Review 6.  Zinc supplementation for tinnitus.

Authors:  Osmar C Person; Maria Es Puga; Edina Mk da Silva; Maria R Torloni
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-11-23

7.  Mental Health Symptoms Among Veteran VA Users by Tinnitus Severity:A Population-based Survey.

Authors:  Austin Prewitt; Graham Harker; Tess A Gilbert; Elizabeth Hooker; Maya E O'Neil; Kelly M Reavis; James A Henry; Kathleen F Carlson
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 1.437

Review 8.  Betahistine for tinnitus.

Authors:  Inge Wegner; Deborah A Hall; Adriana Leni Smit; Don McFerran; Inge Stegeman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-12-28

9.  Sound therapy (using amplification devices and/or sound generators) for tinnitus.

Authors:  Magdalena Sereda; Jun Xia; Amr El Refaie; Deborah A Hall; Derek J Hoare
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-12-27

10.  Consensus on Hearing Aid Candidature and Fitting for Mild Hearing Loss, With and Without Tinnitus: Delphi Review.

Authors:  Magdalena Sereda; Derek J Hoare; Richard Nicholson; Sandra Smith; Deborah A Hall
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.