Austin Prewitt1,2, Graham Harker1,2, Tess A Gilbert1, Elizabeth Hooker1, Maya E O'Neil1,3,4,5, Kelly M Reavis2,3, James A Henry3,6, Kathleen F Carlson1,2,3. 1. VA Health Services Research & Development Service Center of Innovation, Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System (R&D 66), Portland, OR 97239, USA. 2. Oregon Health and Science University - Portland State University School of Public Health, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road (GH230), Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA. 3. VA Rehabilitation Research & Development Service, National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, VA Portland Health Care System (P5-NCRAR),Portland, OR 97239, USA. 4. Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road (GH230), Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA. 5. Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, School of Medicine, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road (BICC), Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA. 6. Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road (PV01), Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Tinnitus is prevalent among Service members and Veterans and is often comorbid with mental health disorders. Associations between the severity of individuals' tinnitus and mental health symptoms are not well described. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a population-based survey of a stratified random sample of 1,800 Veterans diagnosed with tinnitus. We used the Tinnitus Functional Index to measure tinnitus severity and the Primary Care-Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) screen and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale to assess PTSD, depression, and anxiety. Descriptive statistics and bivariable and multivariable regression models were used to estimate associations between Veterans' tinnitus severity and mental health symptoms. Inverse probability weights were used to account for sample stratification and survey non-response. Multivariable odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) controlled for Veterans' demographics, military history, and health diagnoses. RESULTS: A total of 891 Veterans completed surveys (adjusted response rate = 53%). Large proportions rated their tinnitus as severe (29.4%; 95% CI: 27.2-31.6) or very severe (18.7%; 95% CI: 16.8-20.5). In multivariable regression models, and compared with Veterans with none/mild tinnitus, the likelihood of screening positive for PTSD was increased for those who reported moderate (OR = 4.0; 95% CI: 1.6-10.3), severe (OR = 7.5; 95% CI: 3.1-18.5), or very severe (OR = 17.5; 95% CI: 4.4-70.0) tinnitus. Similarly, Veterans' likelihood of positive depression screens were elevated for those with moderate (OR = 2.6; 95% CI: 1.1-5.9), severe (OR = 3.0; 95% CI: 1.4-6.5), or very severe (OR = 15.5; 95% CI: 4.3-55.5) tinnitus, as was the likelihood of positive anxiety screens for those with severe (OR = 2.6; 95% CI: 1.1-6.3) or very severe (OR = 13.4; 95% CI: 4.0-44.3) tinnitus. CONCLUSIONS: Mental health symptoms are strongly associated with Veterans' tinnitus severity. A better understanding of the interplay between these conditions may help improve the provision of interdisciplinary (Audiology and Mental Health) care for Service members and Veterans. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Military Surgeons of the United States 2021. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.
INTRODUCTION: Tinnitus is prevalent among Service members and Veterans and is often comorbid with mental health disorders. Associations between the severity of individuals' tinnitus and mental health symptoms are not well described. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a population-based survey of a stratified random sample of 1,800 Veterans diagnosed with tinnitus. We used the Tinnitus Functional Index to measure tinnitus severity and the Primary Care-Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) screen and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale to assess PTSD, depression, and anxiety. Descriptive statistics and bivariable and multivariable regression models were used to estimate associations between Veterans' tinnitus severity and mental health symptoms. Inverse probability weights were used to account for sample stratification and survey non-response. Multivariable odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) controlled for Veterans' demographics, military history, and health diagnoses. RESULTS: A total of 891 Veterans completed surveys (adjusted response rate = 53%). Large proportions rated their tinnitus as severe (29.4%; 95% CI: 27.2-31.6) or very severe (18.7%; 95% CI: 16.8-20.5). In multivariable regression models, and compared with Veterans with none/mild tinnitus, the likelihood of screening positive for PTSD was increased for those who reported moderate (OR = 4.0; 95% CI: 1.6-10.3), severe (OR = 7.5; 95% CI: 3.1-18.5), or very severe (OR = 17.5; 95% CI: 4.4-70.0) tinnitus. Similarly, Veterans' likelihood of positive depression screens were elevated for those with moderate (OR = 2.6; 95% CI: 1.1-5.9), severe (OR = 3.0; 95% CI: 1.4-6.5), or very severe (OR = 15.5; 95% CI: 4.3-55.5) tinnitus, as was the likelihood of positive anxiety screens for those with severe (OR = 2.6; 95% CI: 1.1-6.3) or very severe (OR = 13.4; 95% CI: 4.0-44.3) tinnitus. CONCLUSIONS: Mental health symptoms are strongly associated with Veterans' tinnitus severity. A better understanding of the interplay between these conditions may help improve the provision of interdisciplinary (Audiology and Mental Health) care for Service members and Veterans. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Military Surgeons of the United States 2021. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.
Authors: Mary B Meikle; James A Henry; Susan E Griest; Barbara J Stewart; Harvey B Abrams; Rachel McArdle; Paula J Myers; Craig W Newman; Sharon Sandridge; Dennis C Turk; Robert L Folmer; Eric J Frederick; John W House; Gary P Jacobson; Sam E Kinney; William H Martin; Stephen M Nagler; Gloria E Reich; Grant Searchfield; Robert Sweetow; Jack A Vernon Journal: Ear Hear Date: 2012 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 3.570
Authors: Sarah M Theodoroff; M Samantha Lewis; Robert L Folmer; James A Henry; Kathleen F Carlson Journal: Epidemiol Rev Date: 2015-01-19 Impact factor: 6.222
Authors: Kathleen F Carlson; Tess A Gilbert; Benjamin J Morasco; Dagan Wright; Joshua Van Otterloo; Aldona Herrndorf; Lawrence J Cook Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2018-08-07 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Tate F Halverson; Adam J D Mann; Rachel L Zelkowitz; Tapan A Patel; Mariah K Evans; Natalie Aho; Jean C Beckham; Patrick S Calhoun; Mary Jo Pugh; Nathan A Kimbrel Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2022-07-13 Impact factor: 11.225