Literature DB >> 10331618

Pulsed versus continuous tones for evaluating the loudness of tinnitus.

J A Henry1, M B Meikle.   

Abstract

Loudness balance techniques are commonly employed to match the loudness of tinnitus using either pulsed or continuous tones; however, it is not known whether the tone duration affects the observed loudness matches. In this study, hearing thresholds and tinnitus loudness matches were measured in 26 subjects with chronic tinnitus using both pulsed and continuous tones. Subjects' thresholds and loudness matches were determined at 11 frequencies between 0.5 and 10 kHz. No significant differences were found between pulsed versus continuous measures, either for thresholds or for loudness matches. There were, however, nine subjects (34.5% of the group) who showed relatively large differences (> or =10 dB) at one or more test frequencies. These "outlier" values did not show systematic trends; some were positive, some negative. In conclusion, studies employing group data appear to be comparable if group sizes are sufficiently large (e.g., > or =25 subjects). Studies employing smaller numbers of subjects may, however, be vulnerable to potential positive or negative biases introduced by one or more outliers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10331618

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  8 in total

1.  An active loudness model suggesting tinnitus as increased central noise and hyperacusis as increased nonlinear gain.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  The role of audiologic evaluation in progressive audiologic tinnitus management.

Authors:  James A Henry; Tara L Zaugg; Paula J Myers; Martin A Schechter
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-07-15

3.  The relationship between tinnitus pitch and hearing sensitivity.

Authors:  Giriraj Singh Shekhawat; Grant D Searchfield; Cathy M Stinear
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Re-examining the relationship between audiometric profile and tinnitus pitch.

Authors:  Magdalena Sereda; Deborah A Hall; Daniel J Bosnyak; Mark Edmondson-Jones; Larry E Roberts; Peyman Adjamian; Alan R Palmer
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 2.117

5.  Relationship between Audiometric slope and tinnitus pitch in tinnitus patients: insights into the mechanisms of tinnitus generation.

Authors:  Martin Schecklmann; Veronika Vielsmeier; Thomas Steffens; Michael Landgrebe; Berthold Langguth; Tobias Kleinjung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Relationship between tinnitus pitch and edge of hearing loss in individuals with a narrow tinnitus bandwidth.

Authors:  Magdalena Sereda; Mark Edmondson-Jones; Deborah A Hall
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 2.117

7.  Auditory evoked magnetic fields in individuals with tinnitus.

Authors:  Magdalena Sereda; Peyman Adjamian; Mark Edmondson-Jones; Alan R Palmer; Deborah A Hall
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Tinnitus Is Associated With Extended High-frequency Hearing Loss and Hidden High-frequency Damage in Young Patients.

Authors:  Zijun Song; Yongzhen Wu; Dongmei Tang; Xiaoling Lu; Liang Qiao; Jing Wang; Huawei Li
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.619

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.