Literature DB >> 18628260

Neonatal outcome of 937 children born after transfer of cryopreserved embryos obtained by ICSI and IVF and comparison with outcome data of fresh ICSI and IVF cycles.

F Belva1, S Henriet, E Van den Abbeel, M Camus, P Devroey, J Van der Elst, I Liebaers, P Haentjens, M Bonduelle.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the safety of cryopreservation in combination with IVF and ICSI, prenatal diagnosis and neonatal outcome were investigated in children conceived from frozen-thawed ICSI embryos (cryo ICSI) and frozen-thawed IVF embryos (cryo IVF). Data were also compared with earlier published results from fresh ICSI and IVF embryos.
METHODS: Questionnaire data and results of physical examination at 2 months of 547 cryo ICSI children and 390 cryo IVF children were compared, and these were also compared with those of infants born after transfer of fresh embryos.
RESULTS: Birth characteristics were comparable for cryo ICSI and cryo IVF infants. Cryo singletons showed a trend towards higher mean birthweight compared with fresh singletons, in ICSI and IVF, reaching significance when all cryo (ICSI plus IVF) singletons were considered. Low birthweight rate according to multiplicity was comparable between the fresh and the cryo groups, in ICSI and IVF. Non-statistically significantly increased rates of de novo chromosomal anomalies (3.2%) were found in cryo ICSI fetuses/children compared with the fresh ICSI group (1.7%) (OR 1.96; 95% CI 0.92-4.14). Major malformations were more frequently observed in cryo ICSI live borns (6.4%) than in cryo IVF live borns (3.1%) (OR 2.15; 95% CI 1.10-4.20) and fresh ICSI live borns (3.4%) (OR 1.96; 95% CI 1.31-2.91).
CONCLUSIONS: In cryo ICSI compared with cryo IVF, prenatal and neonatal outcome results were comparable, except for a higher major malformation rate in the cryo ICSI group. In the total cryo group compared with the total fresh group, we found a higher mean birthweight in singletons and a higher major malformation rate in live borns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18628260     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/den254

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  40 in total

1.  Ovarian stimulation and low birth weight in newborns conceived through in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Suleena Kansal Kalra; Sarah J Ratcliffe; Christos Coutifaris; Thomas Molinaro; Kurt T Barnhart
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Comparison of early pregnancy and neonatal outcomes after frozen and fresh embryo transfer in ART cycles.

Authors:  Abbas Aflatoonian; Fatemeh Mansoori Moghaddam; Mehri Mashayekhy; Farnaz Mohamadian
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Independent factors influencing large-for-gestation birth weight in singletons born after in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Sara Korosec; Helena Ban Frangez; Lili Steblovnik; Ivan Verdenik; Eda Vrtacnik Bokal
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Elevated progesterone and its impact on birth weight after fresh embryo transfers.

Authors:  Yetunde Ibrahim; Miriam J Haviland; Michele R Hacker; Alan S Penzias; Kim L Thornton; Denny Sakkas
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Fresh and Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer Compared to Natural Conception: Differences in Perinatal Outcome.

Authors:  Suzanne Spijkers; Jan Willem Lens; Roel Schats; Cornelis B Lambalk
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 2.031

6.  No difference in congenital anomalies prevalence irrespective of insemination methods and freezing procedure: cohort study over fourteen years of an ART population in the south of France.

Authors:  Any Beltran Anzola; Vanessa Pauly; Debbie Montjean; Line Meddeb; Cendrine Geoffroy-Siraudin; Roland Sambuc; Pierre Boyer; Marie-José Gervoise-Boyer
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Birth defects after assisted reproductive technology according to the method of treatment in Japan: nationwide data between 2004 and 2012.

Authors:  Syuichi Ooki
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 3.674

8.  Outcome Analysis of Day-3 Frozen Embryo Transfer v/s Fresh Embryo Transfer in Infertility: A Prospective Therapeutic Study in Indian Scenario.

Authors:  Neha Palo Chandel; Vidya V Bhat; B S Bhat; Sidharth S Chandel
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2015-05-22

Review 9.  In vitro fertilization and adverse childhood outcomes: what we know, where we are going, and how we will get there. A glimpse into what lies behind and beckons ahead.

Authors:  Suleena Kansal Kalra; Kurt T Barnhart
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Validation of birth outcomes from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System (SART CORS): population-based analysis from the Massachusetts Outcome Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology (MOSART).

Authors:  Judy E Stern; Daksha Gopal; Rebecca F Liberman; Marlene Anderka; Milton Kotelchuck; Barbara Luke
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 7.329

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.