Literature DB >> 18626704

Laparoscopic resection for endoscopically unresectable colorectal polyps: analysis of 525 patients.

Frank Benedix1, Ferdinand Köckerling, Hans Lippert, Hubert Scheidbach.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For the management of endoscopically irretrievable polyps, several minimally invasive procedures are currently available as alternatives to conventional laparotomy. However, the high rate of malignant transformation despite initially benign histology continues to be a problem.
METHODS: Within the framework of a prospective multicenter observational study, all patients with adenomatous polyps unsuitable for endoscopic removal and with benign histology were investigated. In addition to an analysis of the perioperative course and the definitive histology, the overall and disease-free survival rates of patients with malignant transformation of colorectal adenomas were also calculated.
RESULTS: A total of 525 patients (median age 65.3 years; median body mass index 25.6 kg/m(2)) underwent a laparoscopic resection. Conversion to laparotomy became necessary in 17 (3.2%) cases. The perioperative morbidity rate was 20.8%, and malignant transformation occurred in a total of 18.1% of the adenomatous polyps. The median number of lymph nodes removed was 12, and lymph node metastases were seen in a total of 14.8% of the patients (T1--4.8%, T2--19.4%, T3--25%, T4--100%). Estimated 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 92.4% and 80.6%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: For the management of endoscopically unresectable polyps, laparoscopic resection is currently the technique of choice. In addition to the benefits of minimally invasive surgery, in the hands of an experienced surgeon it achieves results comparable with those of open surgery. In view of the high rate of malignant transformation and the absence of unequivocal factors predictive of already present malignant transformation, an oncologically radical operation is essential. In the elderly patient presenting with comorbidities limited resection aiming to minimize surgical trauma in potentially benign disease may be considered. In such a case, however, frozen-section histology is obligatory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18626704     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-008-0059-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  21 in total

1.  Laparoscopic-assisted coloscopic polypectomy.

Authors:  P Prohm; J Weber; C Bönner
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Minimally invasive resection for colorectal cancer: perioperative and medium-term results in an unselected patient group at a single institution.

Authors:  A D'Annibale; E Morpurgo; V Fiscon; B Termini; A Serventi; G Sovernigo; C Orsini
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2006-11-27       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Laparoscopic colectomy vs traditional colectomy for diverticulitis. Outcome and costs.

Authors:  M A Liberman; E H Phillips; B J Carroll; M Fallas; R Rosenthal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Endoscopic removal of large colorectal polyps: prevention of unnecessary surgery?

Authors:  J Marek Doniec; Mathias S Löhnert; Bodo Schniewind; Frank Bokelmann; Bernd Kremer; Horst Grimm
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Laparoscopic colectomy for colon adenocarcinoma: an 11-year retrospective review with 5-year survival rates.

Authors:  B P Jacob; B Salky
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-03-28       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoscopic-assisted colonoscopic polypectomy: the Texas Endosurgery Institute experience.

Authors:  M E Franklin; J A Díaz-E; D Abrego; E Parra-Dávila; J L Glass
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial.

Authors:  Antonio M Lacy; Juan C García-Valdecasas; Salvadora Delgado; Antoni Castells; Pilar Taurá; Josep M Piqué; Josep Visa
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-06-29       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Is laparoscopic resection of colorectal polyps beneficial?

Authors:  J S Joo; L Amarnath; S D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparoscopic colectomy in the management of large, sessile, transformed colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Konstantinos Nassiopoulos; Theodoros E Pavlidis; Evangelos Menenakos; Cristian Chanson; George Zografos; Panajotis Petropoulos
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2005 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  [Colorectal adenoma: pro conventional/laparoscopic resection].

Authors:  S Rüth; J Spatz; M Anthuber
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Difficult colon polypectomy.

Authors:  Klaus Vormbrock; Klaus Mönkemüller
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-07-16

3.  Oncologic colorectal resection, not advanced endoscopic polypectomy, is the best treatment for large dysplastic adenomas.

Authors:  Joon Ho Jang; Emre Balik; Daniel Kirchoff; Wouter Tromp; Anjali Kumar; Michael Grieco; Daniel L Feingold; Vesna Cekic; Linda Njoh; Richard L Whelan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-11-05       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  British Society of Gastroenterology/Association of Coloproctologists of Great Britain and Ireland guidelines for the management of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Matthew D Rutter; Amit Chattree; Jamie A Barbour; Siwan Thomas-Gibson; Pradeep Bhandari; Brian P Saunders; Andrew M Veitch; John Anderson; Bjorn J Rembacken; Maurice B Loughrey; Rupert Pullan; William V Garrett; Gethin Lewis; Sunil Dolwani
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 5.  Avoiding colorectal resection for polyps: is CELS the best method?

Authors:  Kentaro Nakajima; Sameer K Sharma; Sang W Lee; Jeffrey W Milsom
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  What is the cost of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)? A medico-economic study.

Authors:  Martin Dahan; Emmanuelle Pauliat; Sandra Liva-Yonnet; Sonia Brischoux; Romain Legros; Arnaud Tailleur; Paul Carrier; Aurélie Charissoux; Virginie Valgueblasse; Véronique Loustaud-Ratti; Abdelkader Taibi; Sylvaine Durand-Fontanier; Denis Valleix; Denis Sautereau; Sébastien Kerever; Jérémie Jacques
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2018-10-28       Impact factor: 4.623

7.  Variation in colectomy rates for benign polyp and colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Joceline V Vu; Kyle H Sheetz; Ana C De Roo; Tadd Hiatt; Samantha Hendren
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection vs laparoscopic colorectal resection for early colorectal epithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  Sophie Sf Hon; Simon Sm Ng; Tiffany Cl Wong; Philip Wy Chiu; Tony Wc Mak; W W Leung; Janet Fy Lee
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-11-25

Review 9.  Management of complex polyps of the colon and rectum.

Authors:  Fernando A Angarita; Adina E Feinberg; Stanley M Feinberg; Robert H Riddell; J Andrea McCart
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Ileocecal Valve Sparing Resection for the Treatment of Benign Cecal Polyps Unsuitable for Polypectomy.

Authors:  Souhaylah Abdalla; Hélène Meillat; Claire Fillol; Kevin Zuber; Gilles Manceau; Vincent Dubray; Laura Beyer-Berjot; Jérémie H Lefevre; Marie Selvy; Stéphane Benoist; Renato Micelli Lupinacci
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2021 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.