OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk factors associated with CR-BSI development in critically ill patients with non-tunneled, non-cuffed central venous catheters (CVC) and the prognosis of the episodes of CR-BSI. Design and setting; prospective, observational, multicenter study in nine Spanish Hospitals. PATIENTS: All subjects admitted to the participating ICUs from October 2004 to June 2005 with a CVC. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENT AND RESULTS: Overall, 1,366 patients were enrolled and 2,101 catheters were analyzed. Sixty-six episodes of CR-BSI were diagnosed. The incidence of CR-BSI was significantly higher in CVC compared with peripherically inserted central venous catheters (PICVC) without significant differences among the three locations of CVC. In the multivariate analysis, duration of catheterization and change over a guidewire were the independent variables associated with the development of CR-BSI whereas the use of a PICVC was a protective factor. Excluding PICVC, 1,598 conventional CVC were analyzed. In this subset, duration of catheterization, tracheostomy and change over a guidewire were independent risk factors for CR-BSI. A multivariate analysis of predictors for mortality among 66 patients with CRSI showed that early removal of the catheter was a protective factor and APACHE II score at the admission was a strong determinant of in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Peripherically inserted central venous catheters is associated with a lower incidence of CR-BSI in critically ill patients. Exchange over a guidewire of CVC and duration of catheterization are strong contributors to CR-BSI. Our results reinforce the importance of early catheter removal in critically ill patients with CR-BSI.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk factors associated with CR-BSI development in critically illpatients with non-tunneled, non-cuffed central venous catheters (CVC) and the prognosis of the episodes of CR-BSI. Design and setting; prospective, observational, multicenter study in nine Spanish Hospitals. PATIENTS: All subjects admitted to the participating ICUs from October 2004 to June 2005 with a CVC. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENT AND RESULTS: Overall, 1,366 patients were enrolled and 2,101 catheters were analyzed. Sixty-six episodes of CR-BSI were diagnosed. The incidence of CR-BSI was significantly higher in CVC compared with peripherically inserted central venous catheters (PICVC) without significant differences among the three locations of CVC. In the multivariate analysis, duration of catheterization and change over a guidewire were the independent variables associated with the development of CR-BSI whereas the use of a PICVC was a protective factor. Excluding PICVC, 1,598 conventional CVC were analyzed. In this subset, duration of catheterization, tracheostomy and change over a guidewire were independent risk factors for CR-BSI. A multivariate analysis of predictors for mortality among 66 patients with CRSI showed that early removal of the catheter was a protective factor and APACHE II score at the admission was a strong determinant of in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Peripherically inserted central venous catheters is associated with a lower incidence of CR-BSI in critically illpatients. Exchange over a guidewire of CVC and duration of catheterization are strong contributors to CR-BSI. Our results reinforce the importance of early catheter removal in critically illpatients with CR-BSI.
Authors: Tjallie I I van der Kooi; Annette S de Boer; Judith Manniën; Jan C Wille; Mariëlle T Beaumont; Ben W Mooi; Susan van den Hof Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2006-12-05 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: J Merrer; B De Jonghe; F Golliot; J Y Lefrant; B Raffy; E Barre; J P Rigaud; D Casciani; B Misset; C Bosquet; H Outin; C Brun-Buisson; G Nitenberg Journal: JAMA Date: 2001-08-08 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: M Angeles García-Teresa; Juan Casado-Flores; M Angel Delgado Domínguez; Jorge Roqueta-Mas; Francisco Cambra-Lasaosa; Andrés Concha-Torre; Cristina Fernández-Pérez Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2007-01-19 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Kedar S Deshpande; Carlo Hatem; Harry L Ulrich; Brian P Currie; Thomas K Aldrich; Christopher W Bryan-Brown; Vladimir Kvetan Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Julia Langgartner; Hans-Jörg Linde; Norbert Lehn; Michael Reng; Jürgen Schölmerich; Thomas Glück Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2004-04-15 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: J R Gowardman; C Montgomery; S Thirlwell; J Shewan; A Idema; P D Larsen; J H Havill Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 1998-10 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: R Peredo; C Sabatier; A Villagrá; J González; C Hernández; F Pérez; D Suárez; J Vallés Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2010-06-10 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: Corsino Rey; Francisco Alvarez; Victoria De-La-Rua; Andrés Concha; Alberto Medina; Juan-José Díaz; Sergio Menéndez; Marta Los-Arcos; Juan Mayordomo-Colunga Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2011-01-27 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: L Lorente; A Jiménez; M M Martín; J Castedo; R Galván; C García; M T Brouard; M L Mora Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2009-04-16 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: Se-Chan Kim; Christian Klebach; Ingo Heinze; Andreas Hoeft; Georg Baumgarten; Stefan Weber Journal: J Vis Exp Date: 2014-12-23 Impact factor: 1.355
Authors: J Domínguez-Herrera; F Docobo-Pérez; R López-Rojas; C Pichardo; R Ruiz-Valderas; J A Lepe; J Pachón Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2011-11-28 Impact factor: 5.191