Literature DB >> 11495620

Complications of femoral and subclavian venous catheterization in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial.

J Merrer1, B De Jonghe, F Golliot, J Y Lefrant, B Raffy, E Barre, J P Rigaud, D Casciani, B Misset, C Bosquet, H Outin, C Brun-Buisson, G Nitenberg.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Whether venous catheterization at the femoral site is associated with an increased risk of complications compared with that at the subclavian site is debated.
OBJECTIVE: To compare mechanical, infectious, and thrombotic complications of femoral and subclavian venous catheterization. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Concealed, randomized controlled clinical trial conducted between December 1997 and July 2000 at 8 intensive care units (ICUs) in France. PATIENTS: Two hundred eighty-nine adult patients receiving a first central venous catheter.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to undergo central venous catheterization at the femoral site (n = 145) or subclavian site (n = 144). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rate and severity of mechanical, infectious, and thrombotic complications, compared by catheterization site in 289, 270, and 223 patients, respectively.
RESULTS: Femoral catheterization was associated with a higher incidence rate of overall infectious complications (19.8% vs 4.5%; P<.001; incidence density of 20 vs 3.7 per 1000 catheter-days) and of major infectious complications (clinical sepsis with or without bloodstream infection, 4.4% vs 1.5%; P =.07; incidence density of 4.5 vs 1.2 per 1000 catheter-days), as well as of overall thrombotic complications (21.5% vs 1.9%; P<.001) and complete thrombosis of the vessel (6% vs 0%; P =.01); rates of overall and major mechanical complications were similar between the 2 groups (17.3% vs 18.8 %; P =.74 and 1.4% vs 2.8%; P =.44, respectively). Risk factors for mechanical complications were duration of insertion (odds ratio [OR], 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.08 per additional minute; P<.001); insertion in 2 of the centers (OR, 4.52; 95% CI, 1.81-11.23; P =.001); and insertion during the night (OR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.04-4.08; P =.03). The only factor associated with infectious complications was femoral catheterization (hazard ratio [HR], 4.83; 95% CI, 1.96-11.93; P<.001); antibiotic administration via the catheter decreased risk of infectious complications (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.18-0.93; P =.03). Femoral catheterization was the only risk factor for thrombotic complications (OR, 14.42; 95% CI, 3.33-62.57; P<.001).
CONCLUSION: Femoral venous catheterization is associated with a greater risk of infectious and thrombotic complications than subclavian catheterization in ICU patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11495620     DOI: 10.1001/jama.286.6.700

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  208 in total

1.  Reduction in catheter-related bloodstream infections in critically ill patients through a multiple system intervention.

Authors:  R Peredo; C Sabatier; A Villagrá; J González; C Hernández; F Pérez; D Suárez; J Vallés
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Central venous access in intensive care unit patients: is the subclavian vein the royal route?

Authors:  Jean-François Timsit
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Nonvalvular Intravascular Device-related Infections.

Authors:  Nathan A. Gray; Larry M. Baddour
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 4.  Catheter-associated infections: pathogenesis affects prevention.

Authors:  Barbara W Trautner; Rabih O Darouiche
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2004-04-26

5.  Creating and evaluating a data-driven curriculum for central venous catheter placement.

Authors:  James R Duncan; Katherine Henderson; Mandie Street; Amy Richmond; Mary Klingensmith; Elio Beta; Andrea Vannucci; David Murray
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2010-09

6.  [Knotted Seldinger wire].

Authors:  A Fiala; B Glodny; I H Lorenz
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 1.041

7.  Malposition of Subclavian Venous Catheter Leading to Chest Complications.

Authors:  Madhur Kumar; Amarjit Singh; Kuldeep Singh Sidhu; Avleen Kaur
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-05-01

Review 8.  A state of the art review on optimal practices to prevent, recognize, and manage complications associated with intravascular devices in the critically ill.

Authors:  Jean-François Timsit; Mark Rupp; Emilio Bouza; Vineet Chopra; Tarja Kärpänen; Kevin Laupland; Thiago Lisboa; Leonard Mermel; Olivier Mimoz; Jean-Jacques Parienti; Garyphalia Poulakou; Bertrand Souweine; Walter Zingg
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-05-12       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 9.  Ultrasonography as a guide during vascular access procedures and in the diagnosis of complications.

Authors:  A Vezzani; T Manca; A Vercelli; A Braghieri; A Magnacavallo
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2013-10-29

Review 10.  Central venous access: techniques and indications in oncology.

Authors:  Pierre-Yves Marcy
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.