Literature DB >> 9267959

Central venous catheter replacement strategies: a systematic review of the literature.

D Cook1, A Randolph, P Kernerman, C Cupido, D King, C Soukup, C Brun-Buisson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of guidewire exchange and new-site replacement strategies on the frequency of catheter colonization and infection, catheter-related bacteremia, and mechanical complications in critically ill patients. DATA SOURCES: We searched for published and unpublished research by means of MEDLINE and Science Citation Index, manual searching of Index Medicus, citation review of relevant primary and review articles, review of personal files, and contact with primary investigators. STUDY SELECTION: From a pool of 151 randomized, controlled trials on central venous catheter management, we identified 12 relevant randomized trials of catheter replacement over a guidewire or at a new site. DATA EXTRACTION: In duplicate and independently, we abstracted data on the population, intervention, outcome, and methodologic quality. DATA SYNTHESIS: As compared with new-site replacement, guidewire exchange is associated with a trend toward a higher rate of catheter colonization (relative risk 1.26, 95% confidence interval 0.87 to 1.84), regardless of whether patients had a suspected infection. Guidewire exchange is also associated with trends toward a higher rate of catheter exit-site infection (relative risk 1.52, 95% confidence interval 0.34 to 6.73) and catheter-related bacteremia (relative risk 1.72, 95% confidence interval 0.89 to 3.33). However, guidewire exchange is associated with fewer mechanical complications (relative risk 0.48, 95% confidence interval 0.12 to 1.91) relative to new-site replacement. Exchanging catheters over guidewires or at new sites every 3 days is not beneficial in reducing infections, compared with catheter replacement on an as-needed basis.
CONCLUSIONS: Guidewire exchange of central venous catheters may be associated with a greater risk of catheter-related infection but fewer mechanical complications than new-site replacement. More studies on scheduled vs. as-needed replacement strategies using both techniques are warranted. If guidewire exchange is used, meticulous aseptic technique is necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9267959     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-199708000-00033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  44 in total

1.  Intravenous therapy.

Authors:  C Waitt; P Waitt; M Pirmohamed
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  Suspected central venous catheter-associated infection: can the catheter be safely retained?

Authors:  Christian Brun-Buisson
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-03-02       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  A comparative assessment of two conservative methods for the diagnosis of catheter-related infection in critically ill patients.

Authors:  John R Gowardman; Paula Jeffries; Melissa Lassig-Smith; Janine Stuart; Paul Jarrett; Renae Deans; Matthew McGrail; Narelle M George; Graeme R Nimmo; Claire M Rickard
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Ultrasound-guided arterial catheterization: a narrative review.

Authors:  Ariel L Shiloh; Lewis A Eisen
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Prevention of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms during catheter exchange using antimicrobial catheters.

Authors:  Mohamed A Jamal; Joel Rosenblatt; Ying Jiang; Ray Hachem; Ann-Marie Chaftari; Issam I Raad
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Central venous catheters-time for a change?. If you put them in properly you don't need to change them routinely.

Authors:  M O'Leary; D Bihari
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-06-27

7.  Central venous catheters and infection. Surveillance is effective in reducing catheter related sepsis.

Authors:  E T Curran; M Booth; J Hood
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-09-05

8.  Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections.

Authors:  Naomi P O'Grady; Mary Alexander; Lillian A Burns; E Patchen Dellinger; Jeffrey Garland; Stephen O Heard; Pamela A Lipsett; Henry Masur; Leonard A Mermel; Michele L Pearson; Issam I Raad; Adrienne G Randolph; Mark E Rupp; Sanjay Saint
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections: recommendations relevant to interventional radiology for venous catheter placement and maintenance.

Authors:  Donald L Miller; Naomi P O'Grady
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 10.  [Diagnosis and therapy of sepsis. Guidelines of the German Sepsis Society Inc. and the German Interdisciplinary Society for Intensive and Emergency Medicine].

Authors:  K Reinhart; F Brunkhorst; H Bone; H Gerlach; M Gründling; G Kreymann; P Kujath; G Marggraf; K Mayer; A Meier-Hellmann; C Peckelsen; C Putensen; M Quintel; M Ragaller; R Rossaint; F Stüber; N Weiler; T Welte; K Werdan
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 0.743

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.