Literature DB >> 18618183

Analysis of clinical applicability of the breast cancer nomogram for positive sentinel lymph node: the canadian experience.

Eric Poirier1, Lucas Sideris, Pierre Dubé, Pierre Drolet, Sarkis H Meterissian.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A Breast Cancer Nomogram (BCN) for predicting nonsentinel lymph node (NSLN) involvement has been developed and prospectively tested in several series. However, its clinical applicability has never been tested among surgeons.
METHODS: The BCN was applied to 209 SLN-positive patients. Its performance was assessed by the area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Surgeons in Quebec were surveyed to determine the predicted NSLN positivity below which they would not dissect the axilla. The accuracy of the BCN was determined in this clinically relevant range.
RESULTS: The predictive accuracy of the BCN had an area under the ROC curve of 0.687. Almost half of interviewed surgeons treat over 20 breast cancer per year. Fourteen out of 82 surgeons questioned would never leave the patient without a completion axillary dissection after a positive SLN, regardless of the BCN result. Seventy one percent of them would not complete axillary dissection if the prediction of a positive NSLN was </=10%. Only 37 of the 209 patients were in this 10% or less category, with a mean observed rate of positive NSLN of 13% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2-24%).
CONCLUSION: The global performance of the BCN was fair. A majority of surgeons in Quebec would omit an axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) if the predicted probability of positive NSLN is 10% or less. Although useful, the BCN data should be used with caution at the low end of the scale. Because of some limitations in the performance in this category, other clinical factors and judgment must accompany its use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18618183     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-008-0033-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  12 in total

1.  Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Nomogram to predict the risk of non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in Japanese breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Tatsunari Sasada; Shigeru Murakami; Tsuyoshi Kataoka; Masahiro Ohara; Shinji Ozaki; Morihito Okada; Hideki Ohdan
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Beware the node: the more we know, the less aggressive we are.

Authors:  A Piñero
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 3.  Consensus on the regional lymph nodes irradiation in breast cancer.

Authors:  E Bayo; I Herruzo; M Arenas; M Algara
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 4.  Sentinel Lymph Nodes for Breast Carcinoma: A Paradigm Shift.

Authors:  Aoife Maguire; Edi Brogi
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 5.534

5.  Factors that determine whether a patient receives completion axillary lymph node dissection after a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer in British Columbia.

Authors:  Nava Aslani; Todd Swanson; Hagen Kennecke; Ryan Woods; Noelle Davis
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  Predicting non-sentinel lymph node status after positive sentinel biopsy in breast cancer: what model performs the best in a Czech population?

Authors:  Oldrich Coufal; Tomás Pavlík; Pavel Fabian; Rita Bori; Gábor Boross; István Sejben; Róbert Maráz; Jaroslav Koca; Eva Krejcí; Iva Horáková; Vendula Foltinová; Pavlína Vrtelová; Vojtech Chrenko; Wolde Eliza Tekle; Mária Rajtár; Mihály Svébis; Vuk Fait; Gábor Cserni
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 3.201

7.  Predicting Non-sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in a Chinese Breast Cancer Population with 1-2 Positive Sentinel Nodes: Development and Assessment of a New Predictive Nomogram.

Authors:  Jia-ying Chen; Jia-jian Chen; Jing-yan Xue; Ying Chen; Guang-yu Liu; Qi-xia Han; Wen-tao Yang; Zhen-zhou Shen; Zhi-min Shao; Jiong Wu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Factors Influencing Non-sentinel Node Involvement in Sentinel Node Positive Patients and Validation of MSKCC Nomogram in Indian Breast Cancer Population.

Authors:  Naveen Padmanabhan; Muhamed Faizal Ayub; Khadher Hussain; Ann Kurien; Selvi Radhakrishna
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-12-05

9.  Multicenter validation of two nomograms to predict non-sentinel node involvement in breast cancer.

Authors:  Antonio Piñero; Manuel Canteras; Arancha Moreno; Francisco Vicente; Julia Giménez; Ana Tocino; Edelmiro Iglesias; Sergi Vidal-Sicart; Luzdivina Santamaría; Miguel Lorenzo; Manuel García; Diego Ramirez
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.405

10.  Multicenter prospective evaluation of the reliability of the combined use of two models to predict non-sentinel lymph node status in breast cancer patients with metastatic sentinel lymph nodes: the MSKCC nomogram and the Tenon score. Results of the NOTEGS study.

Authors:  Roman Rouzier; Catherine Uzan; Alexandra Rousseau; Eugénie Guillot; Sonia Zilberman; Charles Meyer; Pablo Estevez; Pierre-Francois Dupre; David Kere; Virginie Doridot; Gauthier D'halluin; Xavier Fritel; Nicolas Pouget; Clémentine Jankowski; Chafika Mazouni; Tabassome Simon; Charles Coutant
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.