PURPOSE: The purpose of the current study was to comprehensively evaluate occupational radiation exposure to all intraoperative and perioperative personnel involved in radioguided surgical procedures utilizing (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG). METHODS: Radiation exposure to surgeon, anesthetist, scrub technologist, circulating nurse, preoperative nurse, and postoperative nurse, using aluminum oxide dosimeters read by optically stimulated luminescence technology, was evaluated during ten actual radioguided surgical procedures involving administration of (18)F-FDG. RESULTS: Mean patient dosage of (18)F-FDG was 699 +/- 181 MBq (range 451-984). Mean time from (18)F-FDG injection to initial exposure of personnel to the patient was shortest for the preoperative nurse (75 +/- 63 min, range 0-182) followed by the circulating nurse, anesthetist, scrub technologist, surgeon, and postoperative nurse. Mean total time of exposure of the personnel to the patient was longest for the anesthetist (250 +/- 128 min, range 69-492) followed by the circulating nurse, scrub technologist, surgeon, postoperative nurse, and preoperative nurse. Largest deep dose equivalent per case was received by the surgeon (164 +/- 135 microSv, range 10-580) followed by the anesthetist, scrub technologist, postoperative nurse, circulating nurse, and preoperative nurse. Largest deep dose equivalent per hour of exposure was received by the preoperative nurse (83 +/- 134 microSv/h, range 0-400) followed by the surgeon, anesthetist, postoperative nurse, scrub technologist, and circulating nurse. CONCLUSION: On a per case basis, occupational radiation exposure to intraoperative and perioperative personnel involved in (18)F-FDG radioguided surgical procedures is relatively small. Development of guidelines for monitoring occupational radiation exposure in (18)F-FDG cases will provide reassurance and afford a safe work environment for such personnel.
PURPOSE: The purpose of the current study was to comprehensively evaluate occupational radiation exposure to all intraoperative and perioperative personnel involved in radioguided surgical procedures utilizing (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG). METHODS: Radiation exposure to surgeon, anesthetist, scrub technologist, circulating nurse, preoperative nurse, and postoperative nurse, using aluminum oxide dosimeters read by optically stimulated luminescence technology, was evaluated during ten actual radioguided surgical procedures involving administration of (18)F-FDG. RESULTS: Mean patient dosage of (18)F-FDG was 699 +/- 181 MBq (range 451-984). Mean time from (18)F-FDG injection to initial exposure of personnel to the patient was shortest for the preoperative nurse (75 +/- 63 min, range 0-182) followed by the circulating nurse, anesthetist, scrub technologist, surgeon, and postoperative nurse. Mean total time of exposure of the personnel to the patient was longest for the anesthetist (250 +/- 128 min, range 69-492) followed by the circulating nurse, scrub technologist, surgeon, postoperative nurse, and preoperative nurse. Largest deep dose equivalent per case was received by the surgeon (164 +/- 135 microSv, range 10-580) followed by the anesthetist, scrub technologist, postoperative nurse, circulating nurse, and preoperative nurse. Largest deep dose equivalent per hour of exposure was received by the preoperative nurse (83 +/- 134 microSv/h, range 0-400) followed by the surgeon, anesthetist, postoperative nurse, scrub technologist, and circulating nurse. CONCLUSION: On a per case basis, occupational radiation exposure to intraoperative and perioperative personnel involved in (18)F-FDG radioguided surgical procedures is relatively small. Development of guidelines for monitoring occupational radiation exposure in (18)F-FDG cases will provide reassurance and afford a safe work environment for such personnel.
Authors: Françoise Kraeber-Bodéré; Bertrand Cariou; Chantal Curtet; Boumediene Bridji; Caroline Rousseau; François Dravet; Bernard Charbonnel; Bruno Carnaille; Jean Claude Le Néel; Eric Mirallié Journal: Surgery Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: T Seierstad; E Stranden; K Bjering; M Evensen; A Holt; H M Michalsen; O Wetteland Journal: Radiat Prot Dosimetry Date: 2006-09-20 Impact factor: 0.972
Authors: Ismet Sarikaya; Stephen P Povoski; Osama H Al-Saif; Ergun Kocak; Mark Bloomston; Steven Marsh; Zongjian Cao; Douglas A Murrey; Jun Zhang; Nathan C Hall; Michael V Knopp; Edward W Martin Journal: World J Surg Oncol Date: 2007-07-16 Impact factor: 2.754
Authors: Leigh C Casadaban; Paul J Catalano; Leslie K Lee; Hyewon Hyun; Kemal Tuncali; Victor H Gerbaudo; Paul B Shyn Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2021-02-09 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Stephen P Povoski; Ryan L Neff; Cathy M Mojzisik; David M O'Malley; George H Hinkle; Nathan C Hall; Douglas A Murrey; Michael V Knopp; Edward W Martin Journal: World J Surg Oncol Date: 2009-01-27 Impact factor: 2.754
Authors: Stephen P Povoski; Nathan C Hall; Douglas A Murrey; Andrew Z Chow; Jay R Gaglani; Eamonn E Bahnson; Cathy M Mojzisik; Maureen P Kuhrt; Charles L Hitchcock; Michael V Knopp; Edward W Martin Journal: World J Surg Oncol Date: 2011-11-23 Impact factor: 2.754
Authors: Stephen P Povoski; Nathan C Hall; Douglas A Murrey; Chadwick L Wright; Edward W Martin Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2015-05-08 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Seong H Song; Han G Kang; Young B Han; Ho-Young Lee; Dae H Jeong; Soo M Kim; Seong J Hong Journal: J Biomed Opt Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 3.170
Authors: Stephen P Povoski; Douglas A Murrey; Sabrina M Smith; Edward W Martin; Nathan C Hall Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2014-06-19 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Gregg J Chapman; Stephen P Povoski; Nathan C Hall; Douglas A Murrey; Robert Lee; Edward W Martin Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2014-09-13 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Marco Giovanni Persico; Manuela Marenco; Gianluca De Matteis; Giulia Manfrinato; Giorgio Cavenaghi; Adele Sgarella; Carlo Aprile; Lorenzo Lodola Journal: Contrast Media Mol Imaging Date: 2020-01-22 Impact factor: 3.161