Literature DB >> 18616568

Female preferences for aposematic signal components in a polymorphic poison frog.

Martine E Maan1, Molly E Cummings.   

Abstract

Aposematic signals may be subject to conflicting selective pressures from predators and conspecifics. We studied female preferences for different components of aposematic coloration in the polymorphic poison frog Oophaga pumilio across several phenotypically distinct populations. This frog shows striking diversity in color and pattern between geographically isolated populations in western Panama. Results indicate that male dorsal color is the most important determiner of female preferences. We did not find consistent evidence for effects of other signal components, such as spotting pattern or ventral color. Females in two populations showed assortative preferences mediated by male dorsal coloration. In a third population we found incomplete color-assortative preference behavior, with females exhibiting strong discrimination toward one novel color but not another. These results hint at a possible interaction between sexual and natural selection: female tolerance of unfamiliar coloration patterns could facilitate the establishment of novel phenotypes that are favored by other selective pressures (e.g., predator biases). Furthermore, our study suggests that specific components of the aposematic signal (i.e., dorsal color, ventral color, and spotting pattern) are affected differently by natural and sexual selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18616568     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00454.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  27 in total

Review 1.  Linking the evolution and form of warning coloration in nature.

Authors:  Martin Stevens; Graeme D Ruxton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Mimics without models: causes and consequences of allopatry in Batesian mimicry complexes.

Authors:  David W Pfennig; Sean P Mullen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The role of predator selection on polymorphic aposematic poison frogs.

Authors:  Brice P Noonan; Aaron A Comeault
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Sexual dimorphism and directional sexual selection on aposematic signals in a poison frog.

Authors:  Martine E Maan; Molly E Cummings
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-10-26       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Trade-off between warning signal efficacy and mating success in the wood tiger moth.

Authors:  Ossi Nokelainen; Robert H Hegna; Joanneke H Reudler; Carita Lindstedt; Johanna Mappes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Genetic isolation by distance underlies colour pattern divergence in red-eyed treefrogs (Agalychnis callidryas).

Authors:  Meaghan I Clark; Gideon S Bradburd; Maria Akopyan; Andres Vega; Erica Bree Rosenblum; Jeanne M Robertson
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 6.185

7.  Star finches Neochmia ruficauda have a visual preference for white dot patterns: a possible case of trypophilia.

Authors:  Ayumi Mizuno; Masayo Soma
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.084

8.  Additive genetic variation, but not temperature, influences warning signal expression in Amata nigriceps moths (Lepidoptera: Arctiinae).

Authors:  Georgina E Binns; Liisa Hämäläinen; Darrell J Kemp; Hannah M Rowland; Kate D L Umbers; Marie E Herberstein
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-07-17       Impact factor: 3.167

9.  Distance-dependent defensive coloration in the poison frog Dendrobates tinctorius, Dendrobatidae.

Authors:  James B Barnett; Constantine Michalis; Nicholas E Scott-Samuel; Innes C Cuthill
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Only distance matters - non-choosy females in a poison frog population.

Authors:  Ivonne Meuche; Oscar Brusa; K Eduard Linsenmair; Alexander Keller; Heike Pröhl
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 3.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.