Literature DB >> 35294684

Star finches Neochmia ruficauda have a visual preference for white dot patterns: a possible case of trypophilia.

Ayumi Mizuno1, Masayo Soma2.   

Abstract

Many animals have polka dot patterns on their body surface, some of which are known to have signalling functions; however, their evolutionary origins remain unclear. Dot patterns can trigger a fear response (trypophobia) in humans and are known to function as aposematic signals in non-human animals, suggesting that dots may deserve attention for biological reasons. Interestingly in many birds, plumage dot patterns serve for social/sexual signalling. To understand their evolution, we have focused on the sensory bias hypothesis, which predicts the role of pre-existing sensory preference driven by natural selection in shaping signal design. Our previous phylogenetic comparative study supported the hypothesis and showed that diet-driven visual preference promoted the evolution of plumage patterns, as there was an evolutionary correlation between termite-eating (white roundish gregarious prey) and the presence of plumage dot patterns in species of the family Estrildidae. This suggests that these species possess an intrinsic preference for dots. To test this, we compared the responses of an Estrildid species with dot plumage pattern (star finch Neochmia ruficauda) towards simultaneously presented monochrome-printed white dot vs white stripe patterns under both food-deprived and -supplied conditions. Overall, star finches preferred dots to stripes. They showed foraging-like behaviours almost only toward dots when hungry and gazed at dots frequently even when food was available, suggesting both hunger-related and hunger-neutral dot preferences. These results are rather surprising, given how strongly the subjects were attracted to abstract dot patterns without organic structure, but provided good support for the sensory bias hypothesis.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Estrildid finch; Plumage dot pattern; Sensory bias; Sensory exploitation; Signal evolution; Visual attention

Year:  2022        PMID: 35294684     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-022-01609-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  34 in total

1.  Sensory bias as an explanation for the evolution of mate preferences.

Authors:  Rebecca C Fuller; David Houle; Joseph Travis
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2005-08-05       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  A mechanism for diversity in warning signals: conspicuousness versus toxicity in poison frogs.

Authors:  Catherine R Darst; Molly E Cummings; David C Cannatella
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-03-30       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Female preference predates the evolution of the sword in swordtail fish.

Authors:  A L Basolo
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-11-09       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Aposematic signal variation predicts male-male interactions in a polymorphic poison frog.

Authors:  Laura Crothers; Eben Gering; Molly Cummings
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Sensory ecology, receiver biases and sexual selection.

Authors:  J A Endler; A L Basolo
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1998-10-01       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  EVOLUTION OF CONDITION-DEPENDENT SEX ORNAMENTS AND MATING PREFERENCES: SEXUAL SELECTION BASED ON VIABILITY DIFFERENCES.

Authors:  Malte Andersson
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 7.  Visual Acuity and the Evolution of Signals.

Authors:  Eleanor M Caves; Nicholas C Brandley; Sönke Johnsen
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 17.712

8.  Fear of holes.

Authors:  Geoff G Cole; Arnold J Wilkins
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-08-27

9.  An intracellular antioxidant determines the expression of a melanin-based signal in a bird.

Authors:  Ismael Galván; Carlos Alonso-Alvarez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A perspective on sensory drive.

Authors:  Rebecca C Fuller; John A Endler
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 2.624

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.