Literature DB >> 19536903

Colon cancer screening practices and disclosure after receipt of positive or inconclusive genetic test results for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.

Anne L Ersig1, Donald W Hadley, Laura M Koehly.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients who receive conclusive genetic test results for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) tend to adopt appropriate colorectal cancer screening behaviors and disclose their test results. However, little is known about the disclosure processes or screening behaviors of individuals who receive inconclusive genetic test results. This study compared endoscopy use and disclosure between individuals with positive and inconclusive genetic test results, within a year after results were received.
METHODS: Individuals with a personal history of cancer and suspected of having HNPCC participated in genetics education and counseling, underwent HNPCC testing, and received genetic test results (GCT) within a prospective cohort study. Demographic, psychosocial, and behavioral data were obtained from questionnaires and interviews completed before and after GCT.
RESULTS: Index cases with inconclusive genetic test results were less likely to screen within 12 months. Index cases who disclosed test results to children within 6 months were more likely to screen within 12 months, controlling for mutation status. Index cases with inconclusive genetic test results were less likely to share results with a healthcare provider within 6 months. Index cases who disclosed genetic test results to healthcare providers within 6 months were more likely to have endoscopy within 12 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Genetic test results and disclosure significantly affected colon cancer screening at 12-month follow-up. Interventions to improve adherence to colorectal cancer screening should consider increased education of those receiving inconclusive results and encourage disclosure to healthcare providers and family members.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19536903      PMCID: PMC2826177          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.24478

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  31 in total

1.  Understanding health behavior change among couples: an interdependence and communal coping approach.

Authors:  Megan A Lewis; Colleen M McBride; Kathryn I Pollak; Elaine Puleo; Rita M Butterfield; Karen M Emmons
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Sharing genetic test results in Lynch syndrome: communication with close and distant relatives.

Authors:  Elena M Stoffel; Beth Ford; Rowena C Mercado; Darashana Punglia; Wendy Kohlmann; Peggy Conrad; Amie Blanco; Kristen M Shannon; Mark Powell; Stephen B Gruber; Jonathan Terdiman; Daniel C Chung; Sapna Syngal
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 3.  Screening participation in individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer: a review.

Authors:  G Rees; P R Martin; F A Macrae
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.520

4.  Marriage and cancer prevention: does marital status and inviting both spouses together influence colorectal cancer screening participation?

Authors:  Cornelia H M van Jaarsveld; Anne Miles; Rob Edwards; Jane Wardle
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.136

Review 5.  Recommendations for the care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to Lynch syndrome: a systematic review.

Authors:  Noralane M Lindor; Gloria M Petersen; Donald W Hadley; Anita Y Kinney; Susan Miesfeldt; Karen H Lu; Patrick Lynch; Wylie Burke; Nancy Press
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Screening and preventive behaviors one year after predictive genetic testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Veronica Collins; Bettina Meiser; Clara Gaff; D James B St John; Jane Halliday
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Perceptions of cancer risks and predictors of colon and endometrial cancer screening in women undergoing genetic testing for Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Donald W Hadley; Jean F Jenkins; Seth M Steinberg; David Liewehr; Stephanie Moller; Jean C Martin; Kathleen A Calzone; Peter W Soballe; Ilan R Kirsch
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  The legacy of cancer: the importance of passing on beliefs, values and positive health behaviors for women with cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth G Hunter
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2008

9.  Improving rates for screening colonoscopy: Analysis of the health information national trends survey (HINTS I) data.

Authors:  Timothy M Geiger; Brent W Miedema; Mugur V Geana; Klaus Thaler; Nitin J Rangnekar; Glen T Cameron
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Monitoring coping style moderates emotional reactions to genetic testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  S Shiloh; L Koehly; J Jenkins; J Martin; D Hadley
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.894

View more
  10 in total

1.  Development and validation of an instrument to measure the impact of genetic testing on self-concept in Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  M J Esplen; N Stuckless; S Gallinger; M Aronson; H Rothenmund; K Semotiuk; J Stokes; C Way; J Green; K Butler; H V Petersen; J Wong
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 4.438

2.  Patterns of family communication and preferred resources for sharing information among families with a Lynch syndrome diagnosis.

Authors:  Jenna Petersen; Cathryn Koptiuch; Yelena P Wu; Ryan Mooney; Ashley Elrick; Kathryn Szczotka; Megan Keener; Lisa Pappas; Priyanka Kanth; Andrew Soisson; Wendy Kohlmann; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2018-07-26

3.  Strategies to identify the Lynch syndrome among patients with colorectal cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Uri Ladabaum; Grace Wang; Jonathan Terdiman; Amie Blanco; Miriam Kuppermann; C Richard Boland; James Ford; Elena Elkin; Kathryn A Phillips
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  "The cancer bond": exploring the formation of cancer risk perception in families with Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Aunchalee E L Palmquist; Laura M Koehly; Susan K Peterson; Margarette Shegog; Sally W Vernon; Ellen R Gritz
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-04-17       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 5.  Decision making about cancer screening: an assessment of the state of the science and a suggested research agenda from the ASPO Behavioral Oncology and Cancer Communication Special Interest Group.

Authors:  Marc T Kiviniemi; Jennifer L Hay; Aimee S James; Isaac M Lipkus; Helen I Meissner; Michael Stefanek; Jamie L Studts; John F P Bridges; David R Close; Deborah O Erwin; Resa M Jones; Karen Kaiser; Kathryn M Kash; Kimberly M Kelly; Simon J Craddock Lee; Jason Q Purnell; Laura A Siminoff; Susan T Vadaparampil; Catharine Wang
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Health behaviors in patients and families with hereditary colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Allison M Burton; Shelly R Hovick; Susan K Peterson
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2012-06

Review 7.  Understanding the contribution of family history to colorectal cancer risk and its clinical implications: A state-of-the-science review.

Authors:  Jan T Lowery; Dennis J Ahnen; Paul C Schroy; Heather Hampel; Nancy Baxter; C Richard Boland; Randall W Burt; Lynn Butterly; Megan Doerr; Mary Doroshenk; W Gregory Feero; Nora Henrikson; Uri Ladabaum; David Lieberman; Elizabeth G McFarland; Susan K Peterson; Martha Raymond; N Jewel Samadder; Sapna Syngal; Thomas K Weber; Ann G Zauber; Robert Smith
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Patient compliance based on genetic medicine: a literature review.

Authors:  Kai Insa Schneider; Jörg Schmidtke
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-08-10

9.  Screening and Health Behaviors among Persons Diagnosed with Familial Adenomatous Polyposis and Their Relatives.

Authors:  Aimee S James; Phillip Chisholm; Kathleen Y Wolin; Melanie Baxter; Kimberly Kaphingst; Nicholas O Davidson
Journal:  J Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2012-07-29

10.  Concepts of 'personalization' in personalized medicine: implications for economic evaluation.

Authors:  Wolf Rogowski; Katherine Payne; Petra Schnell-Inderst; Andrea Manca; Ursula Rochau; Beate Jahn; Oguzhan Alagoz; Reiner Leidl; Uwe Siebert
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.981

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.