Literature DB >> 18614141

Are mastectomy rates a reasonable quality measure of breast cancer surgery?

Laurence E McCahill1, Alicia R Privette, Michael R Hart, Ted A James.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Quality measures of breast cancer clinical management adopted by the National Quality Forum do not address the quality of surgical performance. We evaluated mastectomy rate as one potential quality indicator.
METHODS: We reviewed the surgical management of small (stage T1; < or =2 cm) invasive breast tumors in patients treated from April 2003 through April 2007 at our institution. For patients undergoing mastectomy, factors leading to the selection of mastectomy were analyzed.
RESULTS: We identified 496 patients with invasive breast cancer: 433 did not undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and 319 of these had pathologic tumors < or =2 cm in size. Of these, 55 (17.2%) underwent initial mastectomy. Medical contraindications to breast conservation were identified in 42 of 319 (13.2%) patients, whereas the selection of mastectomy was attributed to patient choice in 13 of 319 (4.1%) patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Medical contraindications to breast-conserving therapy were much more common than patient choice as the indication for mastectomy. Institution- or surgeon-specific mastectomy rates are unlikely to reflect the complexity of decision making in the surgical management of patients with breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18614141     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.12.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  9 in total

1.  Factors associated with the frequency of initial total mastectomy: results of a multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Heather Spencer Feigelson; Ted A James; Richard M Single; Adedayo A Onitilo; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Tom Barney; Jordan E Bakerman; Laurence E McCahill
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Mastectomy and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy rates: an institutional review.

Authors:  Sameer Damle; Christine B Teal; Joanne J Lenert; Elizabeth C Marshall; Qing Pan; Anita P McSwain
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-09-03

3.  Analysis of a Trend Reversal in US Lumpectomy Rates From 2005 Through 2017 Using 3 Nationwide Data Sets.

Authors:  Jonas A Nelson; Robyn N Rubenstein; Kathryn Haglich; Jacqueline J Chu; Shen Yin; Carrie S Stern; Monica Morrow; Babak J Mehrara; Mary L Gemignani; Evan Matros
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 16.681

4.  Survival Comparisons for Breast Conserving Surgery and Mastectomy Revisited: Community Experience and the Role of Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Adedayo A Onitilo; Jessica M Engel; Rachel V Stankowski; Suhail A R Doi
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2014-12-08

5.  Decision involvement and receipt of mastectomy among racially and ethnically diverse breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Sarah T Hawley; Jennifer J Griggs; Ann S Hamilton; John J Graff; Nancy K Janz; Monica Morrow; Reshma Jagsi; Barbara Salem; Steven J Katz
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Surgeons’ Recommendation is the Factor in Determining the Breast Cancer Surgery Procedures: an Experience from Ruralzzm321990Hospital in Thailand

Authors:  Ajaree Sattaratnamai; Noppawat Samankatiwat; Visnu Lohsiriwat
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2018-05-26

7.  Utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy varies in the treatment of women with invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Adedayo A Onitilo; Jill K Onesti; Richard M Single; Jessica M Engel; Ted A James; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Heather Spencer Feigelson; Tom Barney; Laurence E McCahill
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Non-doctoral factors influencing the surgical choice of Chinese patients with breast cancer who were eligible for breast-conserving surgery.

Authors:  Rui Chen; Sainan You; Zinan Yin; Qiannan Zhu; Chaojun Jiang; Shuo Li; Yan Li; Xiaoming Zha; Jue Wang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 2.754

9.  De-Escalating Breast Cancer Surgery: Should We Apply Quality Indicators from Other Jurisdictions in Canada?

Authors:  Hannah Kapur; Leo Chen; Rebecca Warburton; Jin-Si Pao; Carol Dingee; Urve Kuusk; Amy Bazzarelli; Elaine McKevitt
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 3.677

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.