Literature DB >> 18609410

Adaptation to sensory-motor temporal misalignment: instrumental or perceptual learning?

Jon S Kennedy1, Marc J Buehner, Simon K Rushton.   

Abstract

Sensory-motor delays vary over the course of development and under different environmental conditions. Previous research has shown that humans can compensate for the resulting temporal misalignment while performing sensory-motor tasks (e.g., Cunningham, Billock, & Tsou, 2001a), but remains silent on the question of whether perceptual learning-similar to that involved in adaptation to spatial misalignment (e.g., Redding & Wallace, 1993) and in adaptation to purely intersensory misalignment (e.g., Fujisaki, Shimojo, Kashino, & Nishida, 2004)-is also involved in this adaptive response. Following an attempted replication of Cunningham et al.'s (2001a) study in a preliminary experiment, we present in this paper two experiments that demonstrate that after-effects of adaptation to temporal misalignment do not spontaneously decay. The literature on adaptation to spatial misalignment suggests that, while instrumental learning spontaneously decays in the absence of reinforcement, perceptual learning persists. Therefore our results are consistent with adaptation being effected through perceptual learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18609410     DOI: 10.1080/17470210801985235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  14 in total

1.  Temporal binding of action and effect in interval reproduction.

Authors:  Gruffydd R Humphreys; Marc J Buehner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Physical delay but not subjective delay determines learning rate in prism adaptation.

Authors:  Hirokazu Tanaka; Kazuhiro Homma; Hiroshi Imamizu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Adaptation to visual feedback delays on touchscreens with hand vision.

Authors:  Elie Cattan; Pascal Perrier; François Bérard; Silvain Gerber; Amélie Rochet-Capellan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Esophageal Temperature Monitoring During Radiofrequency Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ketan Koranne; Indranill Basu-Ray; Valay Parikh; Mark Pollet; Suwei Wang; Nilesh Mathuria; Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy; Jie Cheng
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2016-12-31

5.  Attention regulates the plasticity of multisensory timing.

Authors:  James Heron; Neil W Roach; David Whitaker; James V M Hanson
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.386

6.  Asynchrony adaptation reveals neural population code for audio-visual timing.

Authors:  Neil W Roach; James Heron; David Whitaker; Paul V McGraw
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Motor-sensory recalibration modulates perceived simultaneity of cross-modal events at different distances.

Authors:  Brent D Parsons; Scott D Novich; David M Eagleman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-02-26

8.  The role of feed-forward and feedback processes for closed-loop prosthesis control.

Authors:  Ian Saunders; Sethu Vijayakumar
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 4.262

9.  Effect before cause: supramodal recalibration of sensorimotor timing.

Authors:  James Heron; James V M Hanson; David Whitaker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Duration reproduction with sensory feedback delay: differential involvement of perception and action time.

Authors:  Stephanie Ganzenmüller; Zhuanghua Shi; Hermann J Müller
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.