Literature DB >> 18607545

A measure of confidence in Bland-Altman analysis for the interchangeability of two methods of measurement.

David Preiss1, Joseph Fisher.   

Abstract

Bland-Altman (B-A) analysis has largely replaced the correlation coefficient as the predominant tool for evaluating the interchangeability of two methods of clinical measurement. However, we contend that B-A analysis might lead to erroneous conclusions when the data range is small. We provide an example to illustrate this and explore a possible analysis technique to address this limitation.

Mesh：

Year:  2008        PMID： 18607545     DOI： 10.1007/s10877-008-9127-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN： 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  6 in total

1.  A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques.

Authors:  L A Critchley; J A Critchley
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 2.  Applying the right statistics: analyses of measurement studies.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 7.299

3.  Evaluating agreement between two methods for measuring the same quantity: a response.

Authors:  J Lee
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.589

4.  A note on the use of the intraclass correlation coefficient in the evaluation of agreement between two methods of measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.589

5.  Statistical evaluation of agreement between two methods for measuring a quantitative variable.

Authors:  J Lee; D Koh; C N Ong
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.589

6.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321
  6 in total
  12 in total

1.  Does using two Doppler cardiac output monitors in tandem provide a reliable trend line of changes for validation studies?

Authors:  Huang Li; Lester A H Critchley; Jie Zhang
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Electrical velocimetry as a tool for measuring cardiac output in small infants after heart surgery.

Authors:  Oswin Grollmuss; Serge Demontoux; André Capderou; Alain Serraf; Emre Belli
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Sample size determination in method comparison and observer variability studies.

Authors:  Oke Gerke; Andreas Kristian Pedersen; Birgit Debrabant; Ulrich Halekoh; Sören Möller
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 1.977

4.  Non-invasive accurate measurement of arterial PCO2 in a pediatric animal model.

Authors:  Jorn Fierstra; Jeff D Winter; Matthew Machina; Jelena Lukovic; James Duffin; Andrea Kassner; Joseph A Fisher
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  Assessment of interchangeability rate between 2 methods of measurements: An example with a cardiac output comparison study.

Authors:  Emmanuel Lorne; Momar Diouf; Robert B P de Wilde; Marc-Olivier Fischer
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Validity of Nutrient Intakes Derived from an Internet Website Dish-Based Dietary Record for Self-Management of Weight among Japanese Women.

Authors:  Eri Matsuzaki; Mikiko Michie; Terue Kawabata
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2017-09-24       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 7.  Reporting Standards for a Bland-Altman Agreement Analysis: A Review of Methodological Reviews.

Authors:  Oke Gerke
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-22

8.  Agreement in Histological Assessment of Mitotic Activity Between Microscopy and Digital Whole Slide Images Informs Conversion for Clinical Diagnosis.

Authors:  Bih-Rong Wei; Charles H Halsey; Shelley B Hoover; Munish Puri; Howard H Yang; Brandon D Gallas; Maxwell P Lee; Weijie Chen; Amy C Durham; Jennifer E Dwyer; Melissa D Sánchez; Ryan P Traslavina; Chad Frank; Charles Bradley; Lawrence D McGill; D Glen Esplin; Paula A Schaffer; Sarah D Cramer; L Tiffany Lyle; Jessica Beck; Elizabeth Buza; Qi Gong; Stephen M Hewitt; R Mark Simpson
Journal:  Acad Pathol       Date:  2019-07-11

9.  Comparison of Anorectal Manometry Testing in Left Lateral and Lithotomy Positions.

Authors:  Priyanka K Kadam-Halani; Avita K Pahwa; Nathanael C Koelper; Lily A Arya; Mary D Sammel; Uduak U Andy
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.913

10.  Non-invasive cardiac output measurement in low and very low birth weight infants: a method comparison.

Authors:  Oswin Grollmuss; Patricia Gonzalez
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 3.418
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.