Literature DB >> 18606417

An accurate estimation of bone density improves the accuracy of subject-specific finite element models.

Enrico Schileo1, Enrico Dall'ara, Fulvia Taddei, Andrea Malandrino, Tom Schotkamp, Massimiliano Baleani, Marco Viceconti.   

Abstract

An experimental-numerical study was performed to investigate the relationships between computed tomography (CT)-density and ash density, and between ash density and apparent density for bone tissue, to evaluate their influence on the accuracy of subject-specific FE models of human bones. Sixty cylindrical bone specimens were examined. CT-densities were computed from CT images while apparent and ash densities were measured experimentally. The CT/ash-density and ash/apparent-density relationships were calculated. Finite element models of eight human femurs were generated considering these relationships to assess their effect on strain prediction accuracy. CT and ash density were linearly correlated (R(2)=0.997) over the whole density range but not equivalent (intercep t <0, slope >1). A constant ash/apparent-density ratio (0.598+/-0.004) was found for cortical bone. A lower ratio, with a larger dispersion, was found for trabecular bone (0.459+/-0.100), but it became less dispersed, and equal to that of cortical tissue, when testing smaller trabecular specimens (0.598+/-0.036). This suggests that an experimental error occurred in apparent-density measurements for large trabecular specimens and a constant ratio can be assumed valid for the whole density range. Introducing the obtained relationships in the FE modelling procedure improved strain prediction accuracy (R(2)=0.95, RMSE=7%). The results suggest that: (i) a correction of the densitometric calibration should be used when evaluating bone ash-density from clinical CT scans, to avoid ash-density underestimation and overestimation for low- and high-density bone tissue, respectively; (ii) the ash/apparent-density ratio can be assumed constant in human femurs and (iii) the correction improves significantly the model accuracy and should be considered in subject-specific bone modelling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18606417     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.05.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  48 in total

1.  Interactive graph-cut segmentation for fast creation of finite element models from clinical ct data for hip fracture prediction.

Authors:  Yves Pauchard; Thomas Fitze; Diego Browarnik; Amiraslan Eskandari; Irene Pauchard; William Enns-Bray; Halldór Pálsson; Sigurdur Sigurdsson; Stephen J Ferguson; Tamara B Harris; Vilmundur Gudnason; Benedikt Helgason
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 1.763

2.  Material Mapping of QCT-Derived Scapular Models: A Comparison with Micro-CT Loaded Specimens Using Digital Volume Correlation.

Authors:  Nikolas K Knowles; Jonathan Kusins; Mohammadreza Faieghi; Melissa Ryan; Enrico Dall'Ara; Louis M Ferreira
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Increased Hip Stresses Resulting From a Cam Deformity and Decreased Femoral Neck-Shaft Angle During Level Walking.

Authors:  K C Geoffrey Ng; Giulia Mantovani; Mario Lamontagne; Michel R Labrosse; Paul E Beaulé
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Patient-Specific Bone Multiscale Modelling, Fracture Simulation and Risk Analysis-A Survey.

Authors:  Amadeus C S de Alcântara; Israel Assis; Daniel Prada; Konrad Mehle; Stefan Schwan; Lucia Costa-Paiva; Munir S Skaf; Luiz C Wrobel; Paulo Sollero
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  Quantitative computed tomography-based finite element analysis predictions of femoral strength and stiffness depend on computed tomography settings.

Authors:  Dan Dragomir-Daescu; Christina Salas; Susheil Uthamaraj; Timothy Rossman
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  A systematic approach to the scale separation problem in the development of multiscale models.

Authors:  Pinaki Bhattacharya; Qiao Li; Damien Lacroix; Visakan Kadirkamanathan; Marco Viceconti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Effects of densitometry, material mapping and load estimation uncertainties on the accuracy of patient-specific finite-element models of the scapula.

Authors:  Gianni Campoli; Bart Bolsterlee; Frans van der Helm; Harrie Weinans; Amir A Zadpoor
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Left-right differences in the proximal femur's strength of post-menopausal women: a multicentric finite element study.

Authors:  F Taddei; C Falcinelli; L Balistreri; P Henys; F Baruffaldi; S Sigurdsson; V Gudnason; T B Harris; R Dietzel; G Armbrecht; S Boutroy; E Schileo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Accuracy of volumetric bone mineral density measurement in high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  Kiranjit Sekhon; Galateia J Kazakia; Andrew J Burghardt; Bryan Hermannsson; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Predicting surface strains at the human distal radius during an in vivo loading task--finite element model validation and application.

Authors:  Varun A Bhatia; W Brent Edwards; Karen L Troy
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.