Literature DB >> 18605575

Field trial and modeling of uptake rates of in situ lipid-free polyethylene membrane passive sampler.

K A Anderson1, D Sethajintanin, G Sower, L Quarles.   

Abstract

Lipid-free polyethylene membrane tubing (LFT) has been further developed in response to a growing need for an inexpensive and simple time-integrative sampling device for dissolved hydrophobic contaminants in water. The LFT sampler is based on the diffusion of dissolved hydrophobic target compounds through the aqueous boundary layer and into the polyethylene membrane, mimicking uptake by organisms. We demonstrate through laboratory and field validation studies that LFT provided the same benefits as many other passive sampling devices, withoutthe potential of analytical interference from lipid impurities. A total of 370 LFTs and semipermeable membrane devices were deployed for 21 days in paired studies at highly urbanized, undeveloped, and two Superfund sites, representing several river conditions. A simple internal surrogate spiking method served as an in situ calibration indicator of the effects of environmental conditions on the uptake rates. A modified extraction method for the LFT increased recoveries while decreasing solvent use and labor compared to other organic extraction procedures. LFT sampling rates were estimated using ratios, in situ calibration and modeling for over 45 target analytes, including PAHs, PCBs, and pesticides.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18605575     DOI: 10.1021/es702657n

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  22 in total

1.  Diffusive flux of PAHs across sediment-water and water-air interfaces at urban superfund sites.

Authors:  D James Minick; Kim A Anderson
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 3.742

2.  PAH and OPAH Flux during the Deepwater Horizon Incident.

Authors:  Lane G Tidwell; Sarah E Allan; Steven G O'Connell; Kevin A Hobbie; Brian W Smith; Kim A Anderson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Significant spatial variability of bioavailable PAHs in water column and sediment porewater in the Gulf of Mexico 1 year after the Deepwater Horizon oil spill.

Authors:  Yongseok Hong; Dana Wetzel; Erin L Pulster; Pete Hull; Danny Reible; Hyun-Min Hwang; Pan Ji; Erik Rifkin; Edward Bouwer
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Environmental and individual PAH exposures near rural natural gas extraction.

Authors:  L Blair Paulik; Kevin A Hobbie; Diana Rohlman; Brian W Smith; Richard P Scott; Laurel Kincl; Erin N Haynes; Kim A Anderson
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 8.071

5.  An approach for calculating a confidence interval from a single aquatic sample for monitoring hydrophobic organic contaminants.

Authors:  Melissa M Matzke; Sarah E Allan; Kim A Anderson; Katrina M Waters
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2012-10-20       Impact factor: 3.742

6.  Emissions of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons from Natural Gas Extraction into Air.

Authors:  L Blair Paulik; Carey E Donald; Brian W Smith; Lane G Tidwell; Kevin A Hobbie; Laurel Kincl; Erin N Haynes; Kim A Anderson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Transport stability of pesticides and PAHs sequestered in polyethylene passive sampling devices.

Authors:  Carey E Donald; Marc R Elie; Brian W Smith; Peter D Hoffman; Kim A Anderson
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Estimating risk at a Superfund site using passive sampling devices as biological surrogates in human health risk models.

Authors:  Sarah E Allan; Gregory J Sower; Kim A Anderson
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 7.086

9.  Assessing soil-air partitioning of PAHs and PCBs with a new fugacity passive sampler.

Authors:  Carey E Donald; Kim A Anderson
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 7.963

10.  Bridging environmental mixtures and toxic effects.

Authors:  Sarah E Allan; Brian W Smith; Robert L Tanguay; Kim A Anderson
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.