Literature DB >> 22997050

An approach for calculating a confidence interval from a single aquatic sample for monitoring hydrophobic organic contaminants.

Melissa M Matzke1, Sarah E Allan, Kim A Anderson, Katrina M Waters.   

Abstract

The use of passive sampling devices (PSDs) for monitoring hydrophobic organic contaminants in aquatic environments can entail logistical constraints that often limit a comprehensive statistical sampling plan, thus resulting in a restricted number of samples. The present study demonstrates an approach for using the results of a pilot study designed to estimate sampling variability, which in turn can be used as variance estimates for confidence intervals for future n = 1 PSD samples of the same aquatic system. Sets of three to five PSDs were deployed in the Portland Harbor Superfund site for three sampling periods over the course of two years. The PSD filters were extracted and, as a composite sample, analyzed for 33 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon compounds. The between-sample and within-sample variances were calculated to characterize sources of variability in the environment and sampling methodology. A method for calculating a statistically reliable and defensible confidence interval for the mean of a single aquatic passive sampler observation (i.e., n = 1) using an estimate of sample variance derived from a pilot study is presented. Coverage probabilities are explored over a range of variance values using a Monte Carlo simulation.
Copyright © 2012 SETAC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22997050      PMCID: PMC3581149          DOI: 10.1002/etc.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem        ISSN: 0730-7268            Impact factor:   3.742


  11 in total

Review 1.  Passive sampling in environmental analysis.

Authors:  Suresh Seethapathy; Tadeusz Górecki; Xiaojing Li
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 4.759

2.  Temporal bioavailability of organochlorine pesticides and PCBs.

Authors:  D Sethajintanin; K A Anderson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Spatial and temporal variation of freely dissolved polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in an urban river undergoing Superfund remediation.

Authors:  Gregory James Sower; Kim A Anderson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Application of semipermeable membrane device (SPMD) to assess air genotoxicity in an occupational environment.

Authors:  Sa Bonetta; E Carraro; Si Bonetta; C Pignata; I Pavan; C Romano; G Gilli
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 7.086

5.  Field performance of seven passive sampling devices for monitoring of hydrophobic substances.

Authors:  Ian J Allan; Kees Booij; Albrecht Paschke; Branislav Vrana; Graham A Mills; Richard Greenwood
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Polyethylene devices: passive samplers for measuring dissolved hydrophobic organic compounds in aquatic environments.

Authors:  Rachel G Adams; Rainer Lohmann; Loretta A Fernandez; John K MacFarlane; Philip M Gschwend
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Monitoring PAHs in the Brisbane River and Moreton Bay, Australia, using semipermeable membrane devices and EROD activity in yellowfin bream, Acanthopagrus australis.

Authors:  Melanie Shaw; Ian R Tibbetts; Jochen F Müller
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 7.086

8.  Semipermeable membrane devices link site-specific contaminants to effects: PART II - A comparison of lingering Exxon Valdez oil with other potential sources of CYP1A inducers in Prince William Sound, Alaska.

Authors:  Jeffrey W Short; Kathrine R Springman; Mandy R Lindeberg; Larry G Holland; Marie L Larsen; Catherine A Sloan; Colin Khan; Peter V Hodson; Stanley D Rice
Journal:  Mar Environ Res       Date:  2008-08-26       Impact factor: 3.130

9.  Field trial and modeling of uptake rates of in situ lipid-free polyethylene membrane passive sampler.

Authors:  K A Anderson; D Sethajintanin; G Sower; L Quarles
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-06-15       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Error bars in experimental biology.

Authors:  Geoff Cumming; Fiona Fidler; David L Vaux
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2007-04-09       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  5 in total

1.  PAH and OPAH Flux during the Deepwater Horizon Incident.

Authors:  Lane G Tidwell; Sarah E Allan; Steven G O'Connell; Kevin A Hobbie; Brian W Smith; Kim A Anderson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Air-water exchange of PAHs and OPAHs at a superfund mega-site.

Authors:  Lane G Tidwell; L Blair Paulik; Kim A Anderson
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) and oxygenated PAH (OPAH) air-water exchange during the deepwater horizon oil spill.

Authors:  Lane G Tidwell; Sarah E Allan; Steven G O'Connell; Kevin A Hobbie; Brian W Smith; Kim A Anderson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Wildfire Impact on Indoor and Outdoor PAH Air Quality.

Authors:  Christine C Ghetu; Diana Rohlman; Brian W Smith; Richard P Scott; Kaley A Adams; Peter D Hoffman; Kim A Anderson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 11.357

5.  Passive sampling devices enable capacity building and characterization of bioavailable pesticide along the Niger, Senegal and Bani Rivers of Africa.

Authors:  Kim A Anderson; Dogo Seck; Kevin A Hobbie; Anna Ndiaye Traore; Melissa A McCartney; Adama Ndaye; Norman D Forsberg; Theodore A Haigh; Gregory J Sower
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 6.237

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.