Literature DB >> 21741671

Estimating risk at a Superfund site using passive sampling devices as biological surrogates in human health risk models.

Sarah E Allan1, Gregory J Sower, Kim A Anderson.   

Abstract

Passive sampling devices (PSDs) sequester the freely dissolved fraction of lipophilic contaminants, mimicking passive chemical uptake and accumulation by biomembranes and lipid tissues. Public Health Assessments that inform the public about health risks from exposure to contaminants through consumption of resident fish are generally based on tissue data, which can be difficult to obtain and requires destructive sampling. The purpose of this study is to apply PSD data in a Public Health Assessment to demonstrate that PSDs can be used as a biological surrogate to evaluate potential human health risks and elucidate spatio-temporal variations in risk. PSDs were used to measure polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the Willamette River; upriver, downriver and within the Portland Harbor Superfund megasite for 3 years during wet and dry seasons. Based on an existing Public Health Assessment for this area, concentrations of PAHs in PSDs were substituted for fish tissue concentrations. PSD measured PAH concentrations captured the magnitude, range and variability of PAH concentrations reported for fish/shellfish from Portland Harbor. Using PSD results in place of fish data revealed an unacceptable risk level for cancer in all seasons but no unacceptable risk for non-cancer endpoints. Estimated cancer risk varied by several orders of magnitude based on season and location. Sites near coal tar contamination demonstrated the highest risk, particularly during the dry season and remediation activities. Incorporating PSD data into Public Health Assessments provides specific spatial and temporal contaminant exposure information that can assist public health professionals in evaluating human health risks. Copyright
© 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21741671      PMCID: PMC3671909          DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.06.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemosphere        ISSN: 0045-6535            Impact factor:   7.086


  15 in total

1.  Risk based management of contaminated sediments: consideration of spatial and temporal patterns in exposure modeling.

Authors:  Igor Linkov; Dmitriy Burmistrov; Jerome Cura; Todd S Bridges
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Comparison of mussels and semi-permeable membrane devices as intertidal monitors of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons at oil spill sites.

Authors:  Paul D Boehm; David S Page; John S Brown; Jerry M Neff; A Edward Bence
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2005-03-16       Impact factor: 5.553

3.  Sources of heavy metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in urban stormwater runoff.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Brown; Barrie M Peake
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2005-07-12       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Bioaccumulation of polycyclic aromatic compounds: 1. Bioconcentration in two marine species and in semipermeable membrane devices during chronic exposure to dispersed crude oil.

Authors:  T Baussant; S Sanni; G Jonsson; A Skadsheim; J F Børseth
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.742

5.  Spatial and temporal variation of freely dissolved polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in an urban river undergoing Superfund remediation.

Authors:  Gregory James Sower; Kim A Anderson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Applying research to public health questions: biologically relevant exposures.

Authors:  Linda S Birnbaum
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Seasonal and annual loads of hydrophobic organic contaminants from the Susquehanna River basin to the Chesapeake Bay.

Authors:  Fung-Chi Ko; Joel E Baker
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.553

8.  Assessment of bioavailable PAH, PCB and OCP concentrations in water, using semipermeable membrane devices (SPMDs), sediments and caged carp.

Authors:  Frank Verweij; Kees Booij; Karel Satumalay; Natascha van der Molen; Ron van der Oost
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.086

9.  Comparative evaluation of background anthropogenic hydrocarbons in surficial sediments from nine urban waterways.

Authors:  Scott A Stout; Allen D Uhler; Stephen D Emsbo-Mattingly
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Predicting bioavailability of PAHs in soils to wheat roots with triolein-embedded cellulose acetate membranes and comparison with chemical extraction.

Authors:  Yuqiang Tao; Shuzhen Zhang; Zijian Wang; Peter Christie
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 5.279

View more
  13 in total

1.  Significant spatial variability of bioavailable PAHs in water column and sediment porewater in the Gulf of Mexico 1 year after the Deepwater Horizon oil spill.

Authors:  Yongseok Hong; Dana Wetzel; Erin L Pulster; Pete Hull; Danny Reible; Hyun-Min Hwang; Pan Ji; Erik Rifkin; Edward Bouwer
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Air-water exchange of PAHs and OPAHs at a superfund mega-site.

Authors:  Lane G Tidwell; L Blair Paulik; Kim A Anderson
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Impact of the deepwater horizon oil spill on bioavailable polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in Gulf of Mexico coastal waters.

Authors:  Sarah E Allan; Brian W Smith; Kim A Anderson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Biosensor applications in contaminated estuaries: Implications for disaster research response.

Authors:  Krisa Camargo; Mary Ann Vogelbein; Jennifer A Horney; Timothy M Dellapenna; Anthony H Knap; Jose L Sericano; Terry L Wade; Thomas J McDonald; Weihsueh A Chiu; Michael A Unger
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 8.431

5.  Bridging environmental mixtures and toxic effects.

Authors:  Sarah E Allan; Brian W Smith; Robert L Tanguay; Kim A Anderson
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.742

6.  Passive samplers accurately predict PAH levels in resident crayfish.

Authors:  L Blair Paulik; Brian W Smith; Alan J Bergmann; Greg J Sower; Norman D Forsberg; Justin G Teeguarden; Kim A Anderson
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Systematic developmental neurotoxicity assessment of a representative PAH Superfund mixture using zebrafish.

Authors:  Mitra C Geier; D James Minick; Lisa Truong; Susan Tilton; Paritosh Pande; Kim A Anderson; Justin Teeguardan; Robert L Tanguay
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 4.219

8.  Exposure to an Environmental Mixture of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Induces Hepatic Cytochrome P450 Enzymes in Mice.

Authors:  Ethan G Stoddard; Subhasree Nag; Jude Martin; Kimberly J Tyrrell; Teresa Gibbins; Kim A Anderson; Anil K Shukla; Richard Corley; Aaron T Wright; Jordan N Smith
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 3.973

9.  Passive sampling devices enable capacity building and characterization of bioavailable pesticide along the Niger, Senegal and Bani Rivers of Africa.

Authors:  Kim A Anderson; Dogo Seck; Kevin A Hobbie; Anna Ndiaye Traore; Melissa A McCartney; Adama Ndaye; Norman D Forsberg; Theodore A Haigh; Gregory J Sower
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 10.  Passive sampling methods for contaminated sediments: risk assessment and management.

Authors:  Marc S Greenberg; Peter M Chapman; Ian J Allan; Kim A Anderson; Sabine E Apitz; Chris Beegan; Todd S Bridges; Steve S Brown; John G Cargill; Megan C McCulloch; Charles A Menzie; James P Shine; Thomas F Parkerton
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 2.992

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.