Literature DB >> 18605503

Social processing improves recall performance.

Matthew B Reysen1, Stephan A Adair.   

Abstract

One recent theory (Dunbar, 2003) has highlighted the importance that processing social information might have had on the evolution of human cognition. Based on an analysis of that theory, researchers predicted that processing information in a social manner would improve recall performance in comparison with nonsocial processing. In order to test this prediction, three experiments were conducted in which participants studied 30-item word lists that were composed of common character traits (Experiment 1) or common category exem-plars (Experiments 2 and 3). Next, participants reviewed 5 list items that were purportedly recalled by either a group member or the computer. Finally, after a brief distractor task, participants were asked to complete an individual recall test for all of the items on the original 30-item list. Of primary interest was recall performance for the list items that were purportedly recalled by either another participant or the computer. We observed that recall performance for list items purportedly recalled by another participant was superior to that for items that were recalled by the computer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18605503     DOI: 10.3758/pbr.15.1.197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  10 in total

1.  Social influences on reality-monitoring decisions.

Authors:  H G Hoffman; P A Granhag; S T Kwong See; E F Loftus
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-04

2.  Transmitting false memories in social groups.

Authors:  Barbara H Basden; Matthew B Reysen; David R Basden
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  2002

3.  Memory for animal tracks: a possible cognitive artifact of human evolution.

Authors:  Matthew J Sharps; Amy Boothby Villegas; Michael A Nunes; Terry L Barber
Journal:  J Psychol       Date:  2002-09

4.  Collaboration can improve individual recognition memory: evidence from immediate and delayed tests.

Authors:  Suparna Rajaram; Luciane P Pereira-Pasarin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-02

5.  Memory conformity: disentangling the steps toward influence during a discussion.

Authors:  Fiona Gabbert; Amina Memon; Daniel B Wright
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-06

6.  Adaptive memory: survival processing enhances retention.

Authors:  James S Nairne; Sarah R Thompson; Josefa N S Pandeirada
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Collaborative inhibition is due to the product, not the process, of recalling in groups.

Authors:  Daniel B Wright; Adriane Klumpp
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-12

8.  A bias for social information in human cultural transmission.

Authors:  Alex Mesoudi; Andrew Whiten; Robin Dunbar
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2006-08

9.  The effects of social pressure on false memories.

Authors:  Matthew B Reysen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-01

10.  Explorations in the social contagion of memory.

Authors:  Michelle L Meade; Henry L Roediger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-10
  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Memory for details about people: familiarity, relatedness, and gender congruency.

Authors:  James A Kole; Alice F Healy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-05

2.  No evidence that omission and confirmation biases affect the perception and recall of vaccine-related information.

Authors:  Ángel V Jiménez; Alex Mesoudi; Jamshid J Tehrani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  The Interprocessual-Self Theory in Support of Human Neuroscience Studies.

Authors:  Elkin O Luis; Kleio Akrivou; Elena Bermejo-Martins; Germán Scalzo; José Víctor Orón
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-01-28
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.