Literature DB >> 11407416

Social influences on reality-monitoring decisions.

H G Hoffman1, P A Granhag, S T Kwong See, E F Loftus.   

Abstract

A modified Asch (1951) conformity paradigm was used to study the impact of social influence on reality-monitoring decisions about new items. Subjects studied pictures of some objects and imagined others. In a later test phase, they judged whether items had been perceived in the study phase, had been imagined, or were new. Critically, for some items, the subjects were informed of a confederate's response before rendering a judgment. Although the confederate was always correct when they responded to old items, for new items, the confederate responded perceived, imagined, or new, or did not respond (baseline). In two experiments, we show that memory for new items was influenced by an erroneous response of the confederate. Social conformity was reduced by undermining the credibility of the confederate (Experiments 1A and 1B), and the confederate's influence was evident even after there was only a 20-min delay between study and test (Experiment 2), when the subjects were 87% accurate on new baseline items. These experiments reveal the power of social influence on reality-monitoring accuracy and confidence.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11407416     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  14 in total

1.  Virtual reality monitoring: phenomenal characteristics of real, virtual, and false memories.

Authors:  H G Hoffman; A Garcia-Palacios; A K Thomas; A Schmidt
Journal:  Cyberpsychol Behav       Date:  2001-10

2.  Perceptions of an old female eyewitness: is the older eyewitness believable?

Authors:  S T Kwong See; H G Hoffman; T L Wood
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2001-06

3.  A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgement.

Authors:  M DEUTSCH; H B GERARD
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1955-11

4.  Response conformity in recognition testing.

Authors:  D M Schneider; M J Watkins
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-12

5.  Role of memory strength in reality monitoring decisions: evidence from source attribution biases.

Authors:  H G Hoffman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Aging and qualitative characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined complex events.

Authors:  S Hashtroudi; M K Johnson; L D Chrosniak
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1990-03

7.  The eyewitness suggestibility effect and memory for source.

Authors:  D S Lindsay; M K Johnson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1989-05

8.  Phenomenal characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined autobiographical events.

Authors:  M K Johnson; M A Foley; A G Suengas; C L Raye
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1988-12

Review 9.  Source monitoring.

Authors:  M K Johnson; S Hashtroudi; D S Lindsay
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 17.737

10.  Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory.

Authors:  E F Loftus; D G Miller; H J Burns
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1978-01
View more
  10 in total

1.  The costs and benefits of memory conformity.

Authors:  Antonio Jaeger; Paula Lauris; Diana Selmeczy; Ian G Dobbins
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-01

2.  Speaking order predicts memory conformity after accounting for exposure to misinformation.

Authors:  Lauren Y Hewitt; Robert Kane; Maryanne Garry
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-06

3.  Reevaluating the potency of the memory conformity effect.

Authors:  Glen E Bodner; Elisabeth Musch; Tanjeem Azad
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-12

4.  Social processing improves recall performance.

Authors:  Matthew B Reysen; Stephan A Adair
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-02

5.  The effects of social pressure on false memories.

Authors:  Matthew B Reysen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-01

6.  Explorations in the social contagion of memory.

Authors:  Michelle L Meade; Henry L Roediger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-10

7.  Social influence in televised election debates: a potential distortion of democracy.

Authors:  Colin J Davis; Jeffrey S Bowers; Amina Memon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Law and (rec)order: Updating memory for criminal events with body-worn cameras.

Authors:  Delene Adams; Helen M Paterson; Hamish G MacDougall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The influences of partner accuracy and partner memory ability on social false memories.

Authors:  Katya T Numbers; Michelle L Meade; Vladimir A Perga
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-11

10.  Reducing the Misinformation Effect Through Initial Testing: Take Two Tests and Recall Me in the Morning?

Authors:  Mark J Huff; Camille C Weinsheimer; Glen E Bodner
Journal:  Appl Cogn Psychol       Date:  2015-09-15
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.