OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using novel autoantibody and cancer-related protein arrays to identify potential biomarkers for the early detection of esophageal adenocarcinoma in serum. METHODS: Sera from 18 patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma and 14 with gastroesophageal reflux disease were added to microarrays designed to detect circulating autoantibodies to 51 tumor-associated antigens. Sera from the same patients were also added to a 53-plex assay for various cancer-related proteins. Cutoff values at 3 standard deviations above the mean expression of gastroesophageal reflux disease were used as a boundary for positivity. RESULTS: Nine proteins and 11 autoantibodies were able to individually segregate at least 1 esophageal adenocarcinoma sample from gastroesophageal reflux disease by means of cutoff values. The most discriminative marker was Fas ligand in the protein array, which was associated with 83.3% sensitivity and 100% specificity. The best performing autoantibody, NY-ESO-1, detected 3 esophageal adenocarcinoma samples. When both of these markers were combined, a sensitivity of 88.9% and specificity of 100% were attained. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer-related protein and autoantibody arrays provide a technically simple and rapid method of identifying potential biomarkers for the detection of esophageal adenocarcinoma in serum. Furthermore, combining these platforms improves the diagnostic power of either platform alone. Integrating technologies that detect the expression of multiple proteins and autoantibodies in serum may provide a noninvasive and accurate method of detecting early esophageal adenocarcinoma.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using novel autoantibody and cancer-related protein arrays to identify potential biomarkers for the early detection of esophageal adenocarcinoma in serum. METHODS: Sera from 18 patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma and 14 with gastroesophageal reflux disease were added to microarrays designed to detect circulating autoantibodies to 51 tumor-associated antigens. Sera from the same patients were also added to a 53-plex assay for various cancer-related proteins. Cutoff values at 3 standard deviations above the mean expression of gastroesophageal reflux disease were used as a boundary for positivity. RESULTS: Nine proteins and 11 autoantibodies were able to individually segregate at least 1 esophageal adenocarcinoma sample from gastroesophageal reflux disease by means of cutoff values. The most discriminative marker was Fas ligand in the protein array, which was associated with 83.3% sensitivity and 100% specificity. The best performing autoantibody, NY-ESO-1, detected 3 esophageal adenocarcinoma samples. When both of these markers were combined, a sensitivity of 88.9% and specificity of 100% were attained. CONCLUSIONS:Cancer-related protein and autoantibody arrays provide a technically simple and rapid method of identifying potential biomarkers for the detection of esophageal adenocarcinoma in serum. Furthermore, combining these platforms improves the diagnostic power of either platform alone. Integrating technologies that detect the expression of multiple proteins and autoantibodies in serum may provide a noninvasive and accurate method of detecting early esophageal adenocarcinoma.
Authors: Alok K Shah; Gunter Hartel; Ian Brown; Clay Winterford; Renhua Na; Kim-Anh Lê Cao; Bradley A Spicer; Michelle A Dunstone; Wayne A Phillips; Reginald V Lord; Andrew P Barbour; David I Watson; Virendra Joshi; David C Whiteman; Michelle M Hill Journal: Mol Cell Proteomics Date: 2018-08-10 Impact factor: 5.911
Authors: Pavel Gromov; Irina Gromova; Jakob Bunkenborg; Teresa Cabezon; José M A Moreira; Vera Timmermans-Wielenga; Peter Roepstorff; Fritz Rank; Julio E Celis Journal: Mol Oncol Date: 2009-11-23 Impact factor: 6.603
Authors: Catrin H Middleton; William Irving; John F R Robertson; Andrea Murray; Celine B Parsy-Kowalska; Isabel K Macdonald; Jane McElveen; Jared Allen; Graham F Healey; Brian J Thomson; Stephen J Ryder; Stefan Holdenrieder; Caroline J Chapman Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-08-05 Impact factor: 3.240